Cargando…

Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?

INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the effect of age on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing major liver surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). METHODS: 77 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: the “< 70-year-olds” group (n = 54) and the “≥ 70-y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ripamonti, L., De Carlis, R., Lauterio, A., Mangoni, I., Frassoni, S., Bagnardi, V., Centonze, L., Poli, C., Buscemi, V., Ferla, F., De Carlis, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01111-6
_version_ 1784647580976676864
author Ripamonti, L.
De Carlis, R.
Lauterio, A.
Mangoni, I.
Frassoni, S.
Bagnardi, V.
Centonze, L.
Poli, C.
Buscemi, V.
Ferla, F.
De Carlis, L.
author_facet Ripamonti, L.
De Carlis, R.
Lauterio, A.
Mangoni, I.
Frassoni, S.
Bagnardi, V.
Centonze, L.
Poli, C.
Buscemi, V.
Ferla, F.
De Carlis, L.
author_sort Ripamonti, L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the effect of age on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing major liver surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). METHODS: 77 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: the “< 70-year-olds” group (n = 54) and the “≥ 70-year-olds” group (n = 23). RESULTS: Median LOS was 19 both for < 70-year-old group and ≥ 70-year-old group (P = 0.72). No differences in terms of severe complication were detected (44.4% Clavien–Dindo 3–4–5 in < 70-year-old group vs 47.8% in ≥ 70-year-old group, P = 0.60). Within 90 postoperative days, 11 patients died, 6 in < 70-year-old group (11.3%) and 5 in ≥ 70-year-old group (21.7%), P = 0.29. The median follow‐up was 20 months. The death rate was 72.2% and 78.3% among patients < 70 years old and ≥ 70 years old. The OS at 2 and 5 years was significantly higher among the < 70 years old (57.0% and 27.7%) compared to the ≥ 70 years old (27.1% and 13.6%), P = 0.043. Adjusting for hypertension and Charlson comorbidity index in a multivariate analysis, the HR for age was 1.93 (95% CI 0.84–4.44), P = 0.12. Relapse occurred in 43 (81.1%) patients in the < 70-year-old group and in 19 (82.6%) patients in the ≥ 70-year-old group. DFS at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 59.6, 34.2, and 23.2 for the < 70 -year-old group and 32.5, 20.3, and 13.5 for the ≥ 70-year-old group (P = 0.26). Adjusting for hypertension and Charlson comorbidity index in a Cox model, the HR for age was 1.52 (95% CI 0.67–3.46), with P = 0.32. CONCLUSIONS:  ≥ 70-year-old patients with PHCC can still be eligible for major liver resection with acceptable complication rates and should not be precluded a priori from a radical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88272092022-02-23 Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable? Ripamonti, L. De Carlis, R. Lauterio, A. Mangoni, I. Frassoni, S. Bagnardi, V. Centonze, L. Poli, C. Buscemi, V. Ferla, F. De Carlis, L. Updates Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the effect of age on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing major liver surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). METHODS: 77 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: the “< 70-year-olds” group (n = 54) and the “≥ 70-year-olds” group (n = 23). RESULTS: Median LOS was 19 both for < 70-year-old group and ≥ 70-year-old group (P = 0.72). No differences in terms of severe complication were detected (44.4% Clavien–Dindo 3–4–5 in < 70-year-old group vs 47.8% in ≥ 70-year-old group, P = 0.60). Within 90 postoperative days, 11 patients died, 6 in < 70-year-old group (11.3%) and 5 in ≥ 70-year-old group (21.7%), P = 0.29. The median follow‐up was 20 months. The death rate was 72.2% and 78.3% among patients < 70 years old and ≥ 70 years old. The OS at 2 and 5 years was significantly higher among the < 70 years old (57.0% and 27.7%) compared to the ≥ 70 years old (27.1% and 13.6%), P = 0.043. Adjusting for hypertension and Charlson comorbidity index in a multivariate analysis, the HR for age was 1.93 (95% CI 0.84–4.44), P = 0.12. Relapse occurred in 43 (81.1%) patients in the < 70-year-old group and in 19 (82.6%) patients in the ≥ 70-year-old group. DFS at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 59.6, 34.2, and 23.2 for the < 70 -year-old group and 32.5, 20.3, and 13.5 for the ≥ 70-year-old group (P = 0.26). Adjusting for hypertension and Charlson comorbidity index in a Cox model, the HR for age was 1.52 (95% CI 0.67–3.46), with P = 0.32. CONCLUSIONS:  ≥ 70-year-old patients with PHCC can still be eligible for major liver resection with acceptable complication rates and should not be precluded a priori from a radical treatment. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8827209/ /pubmed/34142314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01111-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ripamonti, L.
De Carlis, R.
Lauterio, A.
Mangoni, I.
Frassoni, S.
Bagnardi, V.
Centonze, L.
Poli, C.
Buscemi, V.
Ferla, F.
De Carlis, L.
Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
title Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
title_full Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
title_fullStr Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
title_full_unstemmed Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
title_short Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
title_sort major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01111-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ripamontil majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT decarlisr majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT lauterioa majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT mangonii majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT frassonis majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT bagnardiv majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT centonzel majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT polic majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT buscemiv majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT ferlaf majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT decarlisl majorhepatectomyforperihilarcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable