Cargando…

Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland

Millennials are considered the key generation with regard to the consumption of plant-based meat alternatives via flexitarianism. This study sought to characterize millennials’ consumer segments based on their consumption of and attitudes toward meat and meat alternatives. We conducted an online sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knaapila, Antti, Michel, Fabienne, Jouppila, Kirsi, Sontag-Strohm, Tuula, Piironen, Vieno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11030456
_version_ 1784649219160670208
author Knaapila, Antti
Michel, Fabienne
Jouppila, Kirsi
Sontag-Strohm, Tuula
Piironen, Vieno
author_facet Knaapila, Antti
Michel, Fabienne
Jouppila, Kirsi
Sontag-Strohm, Tuula
Piironen, Vieno
author_sort Knaapila, Antti
collection PubMed
description Millennials are considered the key generation with regard to the consumption of plant-based meat alternatives via flexitarianism. This study sought to characterize millennials’ consumer segments based on their consumption of and attitudes toward meat and meat alternatives. We conducted an online survey on the hedonic tones of the associations evoked by meat and meat alternatives, consumption of such foods, and diet-related attitudes among a representative sample of Finnish millennials (N = 546, 59% women, age 20–39 years). Some 41% of respondents regularly ate plant-based meat alternatives, while 43% had tried such foods. We divided the respondents into six segments based on the hedonic tones of their meat vs. meat alternatives associations. The segments differed in terms of their consumption of meat alternatives and the underlying reasons why, importance of meat in meals, and Meat Commitment Scale scores. The segment that reported much more positive associations with meat than meat alternatives (~14% of the respondents) may prove resistant to interventions intended to reduce meat intake, whereas the segment that displayed the most positive attitudes toward meat alternatives (~18%) did not eat much meat. Thus, the four middle segments (totaling ~68%), whose associations’ hedonic tones were close to each other, may be the best targets for future interventions designed to reduce meat consumption through the use of meat alternatives. To conclude, introducing a simple segmentation allowed us to identify consumer segments with large potential to reduce meat consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8834568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88345682022-02-12 Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland Knaapila, Antti Michel, Fabienne Jouppila, Kirsi Sontag-Strohm, Tuula Piironen, Vieno Foods Article Millennials are considered the key generation with regard to the consumption of plant-based meat alternatives via flexitarianism. This study sought to characterize millennials’ consumer segments based on their consumption of and attitudes toward meat and meat alternatives. We conducted an online survey on the hedonic tones of the associations evoked by meat and meat alternatives, consumption of such foods, and diet-related attitudes among a representative sample of Finnish millennials (N = 546, 59% women, age 20–39 years). Some 41% of respondents regularly ate plant-based meat alternatives, while 43% had tried such foods. We divided the respondents into six segments based on the hedonic tones of their meat vs. meat alternatives associations. The segments differed in terms of their consumption of meat alternatives and the underlying reasons why, importance of meat in meals, and Meat Commitment Scale scores. The segment that reported much more positive associations with meat than meat alternatives (~14% of the respondents) may prove resistant to interventions intended to reduce meat intake, whereas the segment that displayed the most positive attitudes toward meat alternatives (~18%) did not eat much meat. Thus, the four middle segments (totaling ~68%), whose associations’ hedonic tones were close to each other, may be the best targets for future interventions designed to reduce meat consumption through the use of meat alternatives. To conclude, introducing a simple segmentation allowed us to identify consumer segments with large potential to reduce meat consumption. MDPI 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8834568/ /pubmed/35159606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11030456 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Knaapila, Antti
Michel, Fabienne
Jouppila, Kirsi
Sontag-Strohm, Tuula
Piironen, Vieno
Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland
title Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland
title_full Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland
title_fullStr Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland
title_short Millennials’ Consumption of and Attitudes toward Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives by Consumer Segment in Finland
title_sort millennials’ consumption of and attitudes toward meat and plant-based meat alternatives by consumer segment in finland
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11030456
work_keys_str_mv AT knaapilaantti millennialsconsumptionofandattitudestowardmeatandplantbasedmeatalternativesbyconsumersegmentinfinland
AT michelfabienne millennialsconsumptionofandattitudestowardmeatandplantbasedmeatalternativesbyconsumersegmentinfinland
AT jouppilakirsi millennialsconsumptionofandattitudestowardmeatandplantbasedmeatalternativesbyconsumersegmentinfinland
AT sontagstrohmtuula millennialsconsumptionofandattitudestowardmeatandplantbasedmeatalternativesbyconsumersegmentinfinland
AT piironenvieno millennialsconsumptionofandattitudestowardmeatandplantbasedmeatalternativesbyconsumersegmentinfinland