Cargando…
A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education
The General Medical Council’s publication ‘Outcomes for Graduates’ places emphasis on doctors being able to integrate biomedical science, research and scholarship with clinical practice. In response, a new paradigm of assessment was introduced for the intercalated Bachelor of Science program at Impe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8840837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173511 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S342789 |
_version_ | 1784650714187825152 |
---|---|
author | Goss, Charlotte Culley, Fiona J Parthasarathy, Prabha MacLeod, Ken McGregor, Alison H Sam, Amir H |
author_facet | Goss, Charlotte Culley, Fiona J Parthasarathy, Prabha MacLeod, Ken McGregor, Alison H Sam, Amir H |
author_sort | Goss, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | The General Medical Council’s publication ‘Outcomes for Graduates’ places emphasis on doctors being able to integrate biomedical science, research and scholarship with clinical practice. In response, a new paradigm of assessment was introduced for the intercalated Bachelor of Science program at Imperial College School of Medicine in 2019. This innovative approach involves authentic “active learning” assessments analogous to tasks encountered in a research environment and intends to test a wider range of applied scientific skills than traditional examinations. Written assessments include a “Letter to the Editor”, scientific abstract, and production of a lay summary. A clinical case study titled “Science in Context” presents a real or virtual patient, with evaluation of current and emerging evidence within that field. Another assessment emulates the academic publishing process: groups submit a literature review and engage in reciprocal peer review of another group’s work. A rebuttal letter accompanies the final submission, detailing how feedback was addressed. Scientific presentation skills are developed through tasks including a research proposal pitch, discussion of therapies or diagnostics, or review of a paper. A data management assignment develops skills in hypothesis generation, performing analysis, and drawing conclusions. Finally, students conduct an original research project which is assessed via a written report in the format of a research paper and an oral presentation involving critical analysis of their project. We aspire to train clinicians who apply scientific principles to critique the evidence base of medical practice and possess the skillset to conduct high-quality research underpinned by the principles of best clinical and academic practice. Assessment drives learning, and active learning has been demonstrated to enhance academic performance and reduce attainment gaps in science education. We therefore believe this strategy will help to successfully shape our students as future scientists and scholars as well as clinical practitioners and professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8840837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88408372022-02-15 A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education Goss, Charlotte Culley, Fiona J Parthasarathy, Prabha MacLeod, Ken McGregor, Alison H Sam, Amir H Adv Med Educ Pract Perspectives The General Medical Council’s publication ‘Outcomes for Graduates’ places emphasis on doctors being able to integrate biomedical science, research and scholarship with clinical practice. In response, a new paradigm of assessment was introduced for the intercalated Bachelor of Science program at Imperial College School of Medicine in 2019. This innovative approach involves authentic “active learning” assessments analogous to tasks encountered in a research environment and intends to test a wider range of applied scientific skills than traditional examinations. Written assessments include a “Letter to the Editor”, scientific abstract, and production of a lay summary. A clinical case study titled “Science in Context” presents a real or virtual patient, with evaluation of current and emerging evidence within that field. Another assessment emulates the academic publishing process: groups submit a literature review and engage in reciprocal peer review of another group’s work. A rebuttal letter accompanies the final submission, detailing how feedback was addressed. Scientific presentation skills are developed through tasks including a research proposal pitch, discussion of therapies or diagnostics, or review of a paper. A data management assignment develops skills in hypothesis generation, performing analysis, and drawing conclusions. Finally, students conduct an original research project which is assessed via a written report in the format of a research paper and an oral presentation involving critical analysis of their project. We aspire to train clinicians who apply scientific principles to critique the evidence base of medical practice and possess the skillset to conduct high-quality research underpinned by the principles of best clinical and academic practice. Assessment drives learning, and active learning has been demonstrated to enhance academic performance and reduce attainment gaps in science education. We therefore believe this strategy will help to successfully shape our students as future scientists and scholars as well as clinical practitioners and professionals. Dove 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8840837/ /pubmed/35173511 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S342789 Text en © 2022 Goss et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Perspectives Goss, Charlotte Culley, Fiona J Parthasarathy, Prabha MacLeod, Ken McGregor, Alison H Sam, Amir H A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education |
title | A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education |
title_full | A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education |
title_fullStr | A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education |
title_full_unstemmed | A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education |
title_short | A Paradigm Shift in Assessment of Scientific Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education |
title_sort | paradigm shift in assessment of scientific skills in undergraduate medical education |
topic | Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8840837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173511 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S342789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gosscharlotte aparadigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT culleyfionaj aparadigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT parthasarathyprabha aparadigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT macleodken aparadigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT mcgregoralisonh aparadigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT samamirh aparadigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT gosscharlotte paradigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT culleyfionaj paradigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT parthasarathyprabha paradigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT macleodken paradigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT mcgregoralisonh paradigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT samamirh paradigmshiftinassessmentofscientificskillsinundergraduatemedicaleducation |