Cargando…

Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) rejection surveillance in heart transplant (HT) recipients. This study is the first in Canada to assess the role for noninvasive rejection surveillance in personalizing titration of immunosuppression and patient sati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amadio, Jennifer M., Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard, Superina, Stefan, Kozuszko, Stella, Tsang, Katherine, Simard, Anne, Aleksova, Natasha, Kobulnik, Jeremy, Fan, Chun-Po Steve, Wijeysundera, Harindra C., Ross, Heather J., McDonald, Michael A., Duero Posada, Juan G., Moayedi, Yasbanoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.002
_version_ 1784650985230041088
author Amadio, Jennifer M.
Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard
Superina, Stefan
Kozuszko, Stella
Tsang, Katherine
Simard, Anne
Aleksova, Natasha
Kobulnik, Jeremy
Fan, Chun-Po Steve
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Ross, Heather J.
McDonald, Michael A.
Duero Posada, Juan G.
Moayedi, Yasbanoo
author_facet Amadio, Jennifer M.
Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard
Superina, Stefan
Kozuszko, Stella
Tsang, Katherine
Simard, Anne
Aleksova, Natasha
Kobulnik, Jeremy
Fan, Chun-Po Steve
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Ross, Heather J.
McDonald, Michael A.
Duero Posada, Juan G.
Moayedi, Yasbanoo
author_sort Amadio, Jennifer M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) rejection surveillance in heart transplant (HT) recipients. This study is the first in Canada to assess the role for noninvasive rejection surveillance in personalizing titration of immunosuppression and patient satisfaction post-HT. METHODS: In this mixed-methods prospective cohort study, adult HT recipients more than 6 months from HT had their routine EMBs replaced by noninvasive rejection surveillance with gene expression profiling (GEP) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing. Demographics, outcomes of noninvasive surveillance score, hospital admissions, patient satisfaction, and health status on the medical outcomes study 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) were collected and analyzed, using t tests and χ(2) tests. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed for open-ended responses. RESULTS: Among 90 patients, 31 (33%) were enrolled. A total of 36 combined GEP/dd-cfDNA tests were performed; 22 (61%) had negative results for both, 10 (27%) had positive GEP/negative dd-cfDNA results, 4 (11%) had negative GEP/positive dd-cfDNA results, and 0 were positive on both. All patients with a positive dd-cfDNA result (range: 0.19%-0.81%) underwent EMB with no significant cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. A total of 15 cases (42%) had immunosuppression reduction, and this increased to 55% in patients with negative concordant testing. Overall, patients’ reported satisfaction was 90%, and on thematic analysis they were more satisfied, with less anxiety, during the noninvasive testing experience. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive rejection surveillance was associated with the ability to lower immunosuppression, increase satisfaction, and reduce anxiety in HT recipients, minimizing exposure for patients and providers during a global pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88420902022-02-14 Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19 Amadio, Jennifer M. Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard Superina, Stefan Kozuszko, Stella Tsang, Katherine Simard, Anne Aleksova, Natasha Kobulnik, Jeremy Fan, Chun-Po Steve Wijeysundera, Harindra C. Ross, Heather J. McDonald, Michael A. Duero Posada, Juan G. Moayedi, Yasbanoo CJC Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) rejection surveillance in heart transplant (HT) recipients. This study is the first in Canada to assess the role for noninvasive rejection surveillance in personalizing titration of immunosuppression and patient satisfaction post-HT. METHODS: In this mixed-methods prospective cohort study, adult HT recipients more than 6 months from HT had their routine EMBs replaced by noninvasive rejection surveillance with gene expression profiling (GEP) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing. Demographics, outcomes of noninvasive surveillance score, hospital admissions, patient satisfaction, and health status on the medical outcomes study 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) were collected and analyzed, using t tests and χ(2) tests. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed for open-ended responses. RESULTS: Among 90 patients, 31 (33%) were enrolled. A total of 36 combined GEP/dd-cfDNA tests were performed; 22 (61%) had negative results for both, 10 (27%) had positive GEP/negative dd-cfDNA results, 4 (11%) had negative GEP/positive dd-cfDNA results, and 0 were positive on both. All patients with a positive dd-cfDNA result (range: 0.19%-0.81%) underwent EMB with no significant cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. A total of 15 cases (42%) had immunosuppression reduction, and this increased to 55% in patients with negative concordant testing. Overall, patients’ reported satisfaction was 90%, and on thematic analysis they were more satisfied, with less anxiety, during the noninvasive testing experience. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive rejection surveillance was associated with the ability to lower immunosuppression, increase satisfaction, and reduce anxiety in HT recipients, minimizing exposure for patients and providers during a global pandemic. Elsevier 2022-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8842090/ /pubmed/35187463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.002 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Amadio, Jennifer M.
Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard
Superina, Stefan
Kozuszko, Stella
Tsang, Katherine
Simard, Anne
Aleksova, Natasha
Kobulnik, Jeremy
Fan, Chun-Po Steve
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Ross, Heather J.
McDonald, Michael A.
Duero Posada, Juan G.
Moayedi, Yasbanoo
Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19
title Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19
title_full Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19
title_fullStr Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19
title_short Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19
title_sort sparing the prod: providing an alternative to endomyocardial biopsies with noninvasive surveillance after heart transplantation during covid-19
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT amadiojenniferm sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT rodenasalesinaeduard sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT superinastefan sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT kozuszkostella sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT tsangkatherine sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT simardanne sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT aleksovanatasha sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT kobulnikjeremy sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT fanchunposteve sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT wijeysunderaharindrac sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT rossheatherj sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT mcdonaldmichaela sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT dueroposadajuang sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19
AT moayediyasbanoo sparingtheprodprovidinganalternativetoendomyocardialbiopsieswithnoninvasivesurveillanceafterhearttransplantationduringcovid19