Cargando…
The Frontloading Fields Study: The Impact of False Positives and Seeding Point Errors on Visual Field Reliability When Using SITA-Faster
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of two conventional reliability criteria (false positives [FPs] and seeding point errors [SPEs]) and the concurrent effect of low sensitivity points (≤19 dB) on intrasession SITA-Faster visual field (VF) result correlations. METHODS: Ther...
Autores principales: | Phu, Jack, Kalloniatis, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.20 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gaze tracker parameters have little association with visual field metrics of intrasession frontloaded SITA‐Faster 24–2 visual field results
por: Phu, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Differences in visual field loss pattern when transitioning from SITA standard to SITA faster
por: Le, Christopher T., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Frontloading Fields Study (FFS): Detecting Changes in Mean Deviation in Glaucoma Using Multiple Visual Field Tests Per Clinical Visit
por: Phu, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Effect of Attentional Cueing and Spatial Uncertainty in Visual Field Testing
por: Phu, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Comparative quantification of focal and diffuse visual field loss by the SPARK Precision threshold algorithm and SITA
por: Foo, S. K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)