Cargando…
Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6 |
_version_ | 1784653126949666816 |
---|---|
author | Garone, Anja Bruggeman, Bram Philipsen, Brent Pynoo, Bram Tondeur, Jo Struyven, Katrien |
author_facet | Garone, Anja Bruggeman, Bram Philipsen, Brent Pynoo, Bram Tondeur, Jo Struyven, Katrien |
author_sort | Garone, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. This is especially needed since the Covid-19 pandemic has seen a dramatic shift towards using, and training for integration of digital teaching tools in higher education. The purpose of this qualitative research is to synthesize how professional development initiatives for blended learning in higher education institutions can be evaluated. Following a systematic review of the literature, fourteen empirical research articles were withheld and analyzed qualitatively using an inductive coding framework inspired by the 5 levels of evaluation by ( Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.). The results show that evaluation can be organized into five categories which correspond to the five evaluative levels for professional development by Guskey. The study concludes with recommendations and approaches for each evaluation category with a particular focus on higher education contextual challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8852907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88529072022-02-18 Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence Garone, Anja Bruggeman, Bram Philipsen, Brent Pynoo, Bram Tondeur, Jo Struyven, Katrien Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) Article Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. This is especially needed since the Covid-19 pandemic has seen a dramatic shift towards using, and training for integration of digital teaching tools in higher education. The purpose of this qualitative research is to synthesize how professional development initiatives for blended learning in higher education institutions can be evaluated. Following a systematic review of the literature, fourteen empirical research articles were withheld and analyzed qualitatively using an inductive coding framework inspired by the 5 levels of evaluation by ( Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.). The results show that evaluation can be organized into five categories which correspond to the five evaluative levels for professional development by Guskey. The study concludes with recommendations and approaches for each evaluation category with a particular focus on higher education contextual challenges. Springer US 2022-02-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8852907/ /pubmed/35194376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Garone, Anja Bruggeman, Bram Philipsen, Brent Pynoo, Bram Tondeur, Jo Struyven, Katrien Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
title | Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
title_full | Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
title_fullStr | Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
title_short | Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
title_sort | evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garoneanja evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence AT bruggemanbram evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence AT philipsenbrent evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence AT pynoobram evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence AT tondeurjo evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence AT struyvenkatrien evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence |