Cargando…

Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence

Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garone, Anja, Bruggeman, Bram, Philipsen, Brent, Pynoo, Bram, Tondeur, Jo, Struyven, Katrien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6
_version_ 1784653126949666816
author Garone, Anja
Bruggeman, Bram
Philipsen, Brent
Pynoo, Bram
Tondeur, Jo
Struyven, Katrien
author_facet Garone, Anja
Bruggeman, Bram
Philipsen, Brent
Pynoo, Bram
Tondeur, Jo
Struyven, Katrien
author_sort Garone, Anja
collection PubMed
description Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. This is especially needed since the Covid-19 pandemic has seen a dramatic shift towards using, and training for integration of digital teaching tools in higher education. The purpose of this qualitative research is to synthesize how professional development initiatives for blended learning in higher education institutions can be evaluated. Following a systematic review of the literature, fourteen empirical research articles were withheld and analyzed qualitatively using an inductive coding framework inspired by the 5 levels of evaluation by ( Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.). The results show that evaluation can be organized into five categories which correspond to the five evaluative levels for professional development by Guskey. The study concludes with recommendations and approaches for each evaluation category with a particular focus on higher education contextual challenges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8852907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88529072022-02-18 Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence Garone, Anja Bruggeman, Bram Philipsen, Brent Pynoo, Bram Tondeur, Jo Struyven, Katrien Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) Article Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. This is especially needed since the Covid-19 pandemic has seen a dramatic shift towards using, and training for integration of digital teaching tools in higher education. The purpose of this qualitative research is to synthesize how professional development initiatives for blended learning in higher education institutions can be evaluated. Following a systematic review of the literature, fourteen empirical research articles were withheld and analyzed qualitatively using an inductive coding framework inspired by the 5 levels of evaluation by ( Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.). The results show that evaluation can be organized into five categories which correspond to the five evaluative levels for professional development by Guskey. The study concludes with recommendations and approaches for each evaluation category with a particular focus on higher education contextual challenges. Springer US 2022-02-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8852907/ /pubmed/35194376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Garone, Anja
Bruggeman, Bram
Philipsen, Brent
Pynoo, Bram
Tondeur, Jo
Struyven, Katrien
Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
title Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
title_full Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
title_fullStr Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
title_short Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
title_sort evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6
work_keys_str_mv AT garoneanja evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence
AT bruggemanbram evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence
AT philipsenbrent evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence
AT pynoobram evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence
AT tondeurjo evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence
AT struyvenkatrien evaluatingprofessionaldevelopmentforblendedlearninginhighereducationasynthesisofqualitativeevidence