Cargando…
Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies
Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners’ epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w |
_version_ | 1784653221355061248 |
---|---|
author | Schiefer, Julia Edelsbrunner, Peter A. Bernholt, Andrea Kampa, Nele Nehring, Andreas |
author_facet | Schiefer, Julia Edelsbrunner, Peter A. Bernholt, Andrea Kampa, Nele Nehring, Andreas |
author_sort | Schiefer, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners’ epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic beliefs and their relations with external variables across studies. We examined this comparability by integrating data on epistemic beliefs about the source, certainty, development, and justification of knowledge in science from six studies comprising N = 10,932 German students from elementary to upper secondary school. Applying latent profile analyses to these data, we found that profiles of epistemic beliefs that were previously conceptualized were robust across multiple samples. We found indications that profiles of epistemic beliefs homogenize over the course of students’ education, are related to school tracking, and demonstrate robust relations with students’ personal characteristics and socioeconomic background. We discuss implications for the theory, assessment, and education of epistemic beliefs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8853396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88533962022-02-18 Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies Schiefer, Julia Edelsbrunner, Peter A. Bernholt, Andrea Kampa, Nele Nehring, Andreas Educ Psychol Rev Meta-Analysis Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners’ epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic beliefs and their relations with external variables across studies. We examined this comparability by integrating data on epistemic beliefs about the source, certainty, development, and justification of knowledge in science from six studies comprising N = 10,932 German students from elementary to upper secondary school. Applying latent profile analyses to these data, we found that profiles of epistemic beliefs that were previously conceptualized were robust across multiple samples. We found indications that profiles of epistemic beliefs homogenize over the course of students’ education, are related to school tracking, and demonstrate robust relations with students’ personal characteristics and socioeconomic background. We discuss implications for the theory, assessment, and education of epistemic beliefs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w. Springer US 2022-02-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8853396/ /pubmed/35194354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Schiefer, Julia Edelsbrunner, Peter A. Bernholt, Andrea Kampa, Nele Nehring, Andreas Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies |
title | Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies |
title_full | Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies |
title_fullStr | Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies |
title_short | Epistemic Beliefs in Science—A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies |
title_sort | epistemic beliefs in science—a systematic integration of evidence from multiple studies |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schieferjulia epistemicbeliefsinscienceasystematicintegrationofevidencefrommultiplestudies AT edelsbrunnerpetera epistemicbeliefsinscienceasystematicintegrationofevidencefrommultiplestudies AT bernholtandrea epistemicbeliefsinscienceasystematicintegrationofevidencefrommultiplestudies AT kampanele epistemicbeliefsinscienceasystematicintegrationofevidencefrommultiplestudies AT nehringandreas epistemicbeliefsinscienceasystematicintegrationofevidencefrommultiplestudies |