Cargando…

Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems

Purpose Return to work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) is a strong predictor of return to work (RTW) in employees with mental health problems (MHPs). However, little is known about the development of RTW-SE during the RTW process. In this study, we aimed to identify RTW-SE trajectories in the year following...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horn, Lena, Spronken, Maitta, Brouwers, Evelien P. M., de Reuver, Renée S. M., Joosen, Margot C. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09979-2
_version_ 1784654335606521856
author Horn, Lena
Spronken, Maitta
Brouwers, Evelien P. M.
de Reuver, Renée S. M.
Joosen, Margot C. W.
author_facet Horn, Lena
Spronken, Maitta
Brouwers, Evelien P. M.
de Reuver, Renée S. M.
Joosen, Margot C. W.
author_sort Horn, Lena
collection PubMed
description Purpose Return to work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) is a strong predictor of return to work (RTW) in employees with mental health problems (MHPs). However, little is known about the development of RTW-SE during the RTW process. In this study, we aimed to identify RTW-SE trajectories in the year following sick leave in employees with MHPs and provided a description of the trajectories in terms of personal and work characteristics, and RTW status. Methods This multi-wave study included 111 employees with MHPs. RTW-SE was measured at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up with the RTW-SE scale for employees with MHPs. Results Latent class growth analysis revealed six trajectories. In three trajectories employees had increasing RTW-SE scores, namely (class 1) low start, moderate increase, (class 3) moderate start, small increase and (class 5) moderate start, steep increase. The other trajectories were defined by (class 2) persistently high, (class 6) persistently low, and (class 4) decreasing RTW-SE scores over time. Employees across the various trajectories differed significantly with respect to RTW status, and personal and work characteristics measured at baseline, including age, gender, and type of MHP. Less favorable trajectories (class 4 and 6) were characterized by higher age, a higher prevalence of anxiety disorder and lower RTW rates. The most favorable trajectory (class 2) was characterized by a higher proportion of stress-related disorders and less major depression diagnoses. Conclusions Large heterogeneity exists in terms of RTW-SE trajectories in employees with MHPs and significant differences were found across the trajectories regarding personal and work characteristics, and RTW status. Insights into RTW-SE trajectories and their attributes are important to advance more effective and personalized RTW treatment for employees with MHPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8858915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88589152022-02-23 Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems Horn, Lena Spronken, Maitta Brouwers, Evelien P. M. de Reuver, Renée S. M. Joosen, Margot C. W. J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose Return to work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) is a strong predictor of return to work (RTW) in employees with mental health problems (MHPs). However, little is known about the development of RTW-SE during the RTW process. In this study, we aimed to identify RTW-SE trajectories in the year following sick leave in employees with MHPs and provided a description of the trajectories in terms of personal and work characteristics, and RTW status. Methods This multi-wave study included 111 employees with MHPs. RTW-SE was measured at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up with the RTW-SE scale for employees with MHPs. Results Latent class growth analysis revealed six trajectories. In three trajectories employees had increasing RTW-SE scores, namely (class 1) low start, moderate increase, (class 3) moderate start, small increase and (class 5) moderate start, steep increase. The other trajectories were defined by (class 2) persistently high, (class 6) persistently low, and (class 4) decreasing RTW-SE scores over time. Employees across the various trajectories differed significantly with respect to RTW status, and personal and work characteristics measured at baseline, including age, gender, and type of MHP. Less favorable trajectories (class 4 and 6) were characterized by higher age, a higher prevalence of anxiety disorder and lower RTW rates. The most favorable trajectory (class 2) was characterized by a higher proportion of stress-related disorders and less major depression diagnoses. Conclusions Large heterogeneity exists in terms of RTW-SE trajectories in employees with MHPs and significant differences were found across the trajectories regarding personal and work characteristics, and RTW status. Insights into RTW-SE trajectories and their attributes are important to advance more effective and personalized RTW treatment for employees with MHPs. Springer US 2021-05-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8858915/ /pubmed/33978874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09979-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Horn, Lena
Spronken, Maitta
Brouwers, Evelien P. M.
de Reuver, Renée S. M.
Joosen, Margot C. W.
Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems
title Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems
title_full Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems
title_fullStr Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems
title_short Identifying Return to Work Self-Efficacy Trajectories in Employees with Mental Health Problems
title_sort identifying return to work self-efficacy trajectories in employees with mental health problems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09979-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hornlena identifyingreturntoworkselfefficacytrajectoriesinemployeeswithmentalhealthproblems
AT spronkenmaitta identifyingreturntoworkselfefficacytrajectoriesinemployeeswithmentalhealthproblems
AT brouwersevelienpm identifyingreturntoworkselfefficacytrajectoriesinemployeeswithmentalhealthproblems
AT dereuverreneesm identifyingreturntoworkselfefficacytrajectoriesinemployeeswithmentalhealthproblems
AT joosenmargotcw identifyingreturntoworkselfefficacytrajectoriesinemployeeswithmentalhealthproblems