Cargando…

A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum

BACKGROUND: Previous research shows considerable variation in pre-registration paediatric podiatry curricula, and thus the clinical skills realised prior to graduation. Whilst pre-registration training is guided by regulatory bodies, these high level principles only refer briefly to standards in pae...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reay, Julie, Williams, Cylie, Nester, Chris, Morrison, Stewart C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03138-8
_version_ 1784655862719053824
author Reay, Julie
Williams, Cylie
Nester, Chris
Morrison, Stewart C.
author_facet Reay, Julie
Williams, Cylie
Nester, Chris
Morrison, Stewart C.
author_sort Reay, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous research shows considerable variation in pre-registration paediatric podiatry curricula, and thus the clinical skills realised prior to graduation. Whilst pre-registration training is guided by regulatory bodies, these high level principles only refer briefly to standards in paediatric practice. An estimated 9% of podiatry caseloads in the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia are dedicated to paediatric service provision. Therefore, it is imperative that curricula support the consistent development of paediatric practice enabling newly registered podiatrists to work safely and effectively with children. Given that the global healthcare work force provides unique opportunities to explicitly align international curricula, the aim of this study was to determine the priorities for a UK and Australian binational pre-registration paediatric podiatry curriculum. METHODS: A four round modified Delphi design was employed to ascertain consensus and agreement of a panel of experts with a special interest in paediatrics working in the UK and Australia. Round 1 contained open questions designed to promote diverse responses on the broad topics of lecturer experience and curriculum organisation and delivery. The answers from Round 1 were developed, through content analysis, into a series of statements presented to the panel for agreement in Rounds 2, 3 and 4. RESULTS: Of the 297 statements generated following Round 1, 183 were accepted and 114 rejected by the end of Round 4. 109 of the accepted statements related to curriculum content. Participants also agreed on areas relating to lecturer experience, clinical education, and assessment of paediatric skills. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to describe elements of a curriculum for pre-registration podiatry training. The recommendations highlight opportunities that education providers can work towards during curriculum design. They also emphasise the collaboration that is needed between professional bodies, clinicians and higher education institutions when defining guidelines and expectations for paediatric specific skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03138-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8866550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88665502022-02-24 A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum Reay, Julie Williams, Cylie Nester, Chris Morrison, Stewart C. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Previous research shows considerable variation in pre-registration paediatric podiatry curricula, and thus the clinical skills realised prior to graduation. Whilst pre-registration training is guided by regulatory bodies, these high level principles only refer briefly to standards in paediatric practice. An estimated 9% of podiatry caseloads in the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia are dedicated to paediatric service provision. Therefore, it is imperative that curricula support the consistent development of paediatric practice enabling newly registered podiatrists to work safely and effectively with children. Given that the global healthcare work force provides unique opportunities to explicitly align international curricula, the aim of this study was to determine the priorities for a UK and Australian binational pre-registration paediatric podiatry curriculum. METHODS: A four round modified Delphi design was employed to ascertain consensus and agreement of a panel of experts with a special interest in paediatrics working in the UK and Australia. Round 1 contained open questions designed to promote diverse responses on the broad topics of lecturer experience and curriculum organisation and delivery. The answers from Round 1 were developed, through content analysis, into a series of statements presented to the panel for agreement in Rounds 2, 3 and 4. RESULTS: Of the 297 statements generated following Round 1, 183 were accepted and 114 rejected by the end of Round 4. 109 of the accepted statements related to curriculum content. Participants also agreed on areas relating to lecturer experience, clinical education, and assessment of paediatric skills. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to describe elements of a curriculum for pre-registration podiatry training. The recommendations highlight opportunities that education providers can work towards during curriculum design. They also emphasise the collaboration that is needed between professional bodies, clinicians and higher education institutions when defining guidelines and expectations for paediatric specific skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03138-8. BioMed Central 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8866550/ /pubmed/35209896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03138-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Reay, Julie
Williams, Cylie
Nester, Chris
Morrison, Stewart C.
A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
title A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
title_full A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
title_fullStr A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
title_full_unstemmed A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
title_short A step in the right direction: Delphi consensus on a UK and Australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
title_sort step in the right direction: delphi consensus on a uk and australian paediatric podiatry curriculum
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03138-8
work_keys_str_mv AT reayjulie astepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT williamscylie astepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT nesterchris astepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT morrisonstewartc astepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT reayjulie stepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT williamscylie stepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT nesterchris stepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum
AT morrisonstewartc stepintherightdirectiondelphiconsensusonaukandaustralianpaediatricpodiatrycurriculum