Cargando…

Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins

In this meta-analysis, we collected 58 publications spanning the last seven decades that reported static in vitro protein gastric digestion results. A number of descriptors of the pepsinolysis process were extracted, including protein type; pepsin activity and concentration; protein concentration; p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeda, Natsumi, Dulko, Dorota, Macierzanka, Adam, Jungnickel, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041260
_version_ 1784658563290890240
author Maeda, Natsumi
Dulko, Dorota
Macierzanka, Adam
Jungnickel, Christian
author_facet Maeda, Natsumi
Dulko, Dorota
Macierzanka, Adam
Jungnickel, Christian
author_sort Maeda, Natsumi
collection PubMed
description In this meta-analysis, we collected 58 publications spanning the last seven decades that reported static in vitro protein gastric digestion results. A number of descriptors of the pepsinolysis process were extracted, including protein type; pepsin activity and concentration; protein concentration; pH; additives; protein form (e.g., ‘native’, ‘emulsion’, ‘gel’, etc.); molecular weight of the protein; treatment; temperature; and half-times (HT) of protein digestion. After careful analysis and the application of statistical techniques and regression models, several general conclusions could be extracted from the data. The protein form to digest the fastest was ‘emulsion’. The rate of pepsinolysis in the emulsion was largely independent of the protein type, whereas the gastric digestion of the native protein in the solution was strongly dependent on the protein type. The pepsinolysis was shown to be strongly dependent on the structural components of the proteins digested—specifically, β-sheet-inhibited and amino acid, leucine, methionine, and proline-promoted digestion. Interestingly, we found that additives included in the digestion mix to alter protein hydrolysis had, in general, a negligible effect in comparison to the clear importance of the protein form or additional treatment. Overall, the findings allowed for the targeted creation of foods for fast or slow protein digestion, depending on the nutritional needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8878058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88780582022-02-26 Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins Maeda, Natsumi Dulko, Dorota Macierzanka, Adam Jungnickel, Christian Molecules Article In this meta-analysis, we collected 58 publications spanning the last seven decades that reported static in vitro protein gastric digestion results. A number of descriptors of the pepsinolysis process were extracted, including protein type; pepsin activity and concentration; protein concentration; pH; additives; protein form (e.g., ‘native’, ‘emulsion’, ‘gel’, etc.); molecular weight of the protein; treatment; temperature; and half-times (HT) of protein digestion. After careful analysis and the application of statistical techniques and regression models, several general conclusions could be extracted from the data. The protein form to digest the fastest was ‘emulsion’. The rate of pepsinolysis in the emulsion was largely independent of the protein type, whereas the gastric digestion of the native protein in the solution was strongly dependent on the protein type. The pepsinolysis was shown to be strongly dependent on the structural components of the proteins digested—specifically, β-sheet-inhibited and amino acid, leucine, methionine, and proline-promoted digestion. Interestingly, we found that additives included in the digestion mix to alter protein hydrolysis had, in general, a negligible effect in comparison to the clear importance of the protein form or additional treatment. Overall, the findings allowed for the targeted creation of foods for fast or slow protein digestion, depending on the nutritional needs. MDPI 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8878058/ /pubmed/35209049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041260 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Maeda, Natsumi
Dulko, Dorota
Macierzanka, Adam
Jungnickel, Christian
Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
title Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
title_full Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
title_fullStr Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
title_short Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
title_sort analysis of the factors affecting static in vitro pepsinolysis of food proteins
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041260
work_keys_str_mv AT maedanatsumi analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins
AT dulkodorota analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins
AT macierzankaadam analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins
AT jungnickelchristian analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins