Cargando…
Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins
In this meta-analysis, we collected 58 publications spanning the last seven decades that reported static in vitro protein gastric digestion results. A number of descriptors of the pepsinolysis process were extracted, including protein type; pepsin activity and concentration; protein concentration; p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041260 |
_version_ | 1784658563290890240 |
---|---|
author | Maeda, Natsumi Dulko, Dorota Macierzanka, Adam Jungnickel, Christian |
author_facet | Maeda, Natsumi Dulko, Dorota Macierzanka, Adam Jungnickel, Christian |
author_sort | Maeda, Natsumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this meta-analysis, we collected 58 publications spanning the last seven decades that reported static in vitro protein gastric digestion results. A number of descriptors of the pepsinolysis process were extracted, including protein type; pepsin activity and concentration; protein concentration; pH; additives; protein form (e.g., ‘native’, ‘emulsion’, ‘gel’, etc.); molecular weight of the protein; treatment; temperature; and half-times (HT) of protein digestion. After careful analysis and the application of statistical techniques and regression models, several general conclusions could be extracted from the data. The protein form to digest the fastest was ‘emulsion’. The rate of pepsinolysis in the emulsion was largely independent of the protein type, whereas the gastric digestion of the native protein in the solution was strongly dependent on the protein type. The pepsinolysis was shown to be strongly dependent on the structural components of the proteins digested—specifically, β-sheet-inhibited and amino acid, leucine, methionine, and proline-promoted digestion. Interestingly, we found that additives included in the digestion mix to alter protein hydrolysis had, in general, a negligible effect in comparison to the clear importance of the protein form or additional treatment. Overall, the findings allowed for the targeted creation of foods for fast or slow protein digestion, depending on the nutritional needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8878058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88780582022-02-26 Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins Maeda, Natsumi Dulko, Dorota Macierzanka, Adam Jungnickel, Christian Molecules Article In this meta-analysis, we collected 58 publications spanning the last seven decades that reported static in vitro protein gastric digestion results. A number of descriptors of the pepsinolysis process were extracted, including protein type; pepsin activity and concentration; protein concentration; pH; additives; protein form (e.g., ‘native’, ‘emulsion’, ‘gel’, etc.); molecular weight of the protein; treatment; temperature; and half-times (HT) of protein digestion. After careful analysis and the application of statistical techniques and regression models, several general conclusions could be extracted from the data. The protein form to digest the fastest was ‘emulsion’. The rate of pepsinolysis in the emulsion was largely independent of the protein type, whereas the gastric digestion of the native protein in the solution was strongly dependent on the protein type. The pepsinolysis was shown to be strongly dependent on the structural components of the proteins digested—specifically, β-sheet-inhibited and amino acid, leucine, methionine, and proline-promoted digestion. Interestingly, we found that additives included in the digestion mix to alter protein hydrolysis had, in general, a negligible effect in comparison to the clear importance of the protein form or additional treatment. Overall, the findings allowed for the targeted creation of foods for fast or slow protein digestion, depending on the nutritional needs. MDPI 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8878058/ /pubmed/35209049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041260 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Maeda, Natsumi Dulko, Dorota Macierzanka, Adam Jungnickel, Christian Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins |
title | Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins |
title_full | Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins |
title_short | Analysis of the Factors Affecting Static In Vitro Pepsinolysis of Food Proteins |
title_sort | analysis of the factors affecting static in vitro pepsinolysis of food proteins |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maedanatsumi analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins AT dulkodorota analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins AT macierzankaadam analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins AT jungnickelchristian analysisofthefactorsaffectingstaticinvitropepsinolysisoffoodproteins |