Cargando…
The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
AuCu phase had a significant effect on the bonding strength of Au80Sn20 alloy and Cu substrate. The formation of the AuCu(200)/Cu(200) interface significantly improves the shear strength of solder joints. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the strengthening mechanism of the AuCu phas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041506 |
_version_ | 1784658620579840000 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zihao Feng, Junli Wu, Zhangxi Pang, Mingjun Liu, Dong Yang, Wenchao Zhan, Yongzhong |
author_facet | Li, Zihao Feng, Junli Wu, Zhangxi Pang, Mingjun Liu, Dong Yang, Wenchao Zhan, Yongzhong |
author_sort | Li, Zihao |
collection | PubMed |
description | AuCu phase had a significant effect on the bonding strength of Au80Sn20 alloy and Cu substrate. The formation of the AuCu(200)/Cu(200) interface significantly improves the shear strength of solder joints. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the strengthening mechanism of the AuCu phase in the Cu matrix. The atomic structure, interfacial stability, and interfacial bonding properties of the Cu(200)/AuCu(200) interface were investigated using first-principle calculation. The layer spacing convergence results show that seven layers of Cu(200) surface and seven layers of AuCu(200) surface are enough thick to be chosen for the interface model. The calculation shows that the surface energies are 1.463 J/m(2) and 1.081 J/m(2) for AuCu(200) surface and Cu(200) surface, respectively. Four interface combinations of Top sit, Long bridge, Short bridge, and Hollow were investigated by considering four stacking methods of AuCu(200). It is shown that the interfacial configuration of the Long bridge is the most stable and favorable structure, which has the largest adhesion work, the smallest interfacial energy, and the smallest interfacial spacing. The density of states and electron difference density were calculated for the four interfacial configurations, and the results showed that the main bonding mode of the Long bridge interface is composed of both Cu-Cu covalent bonds and Au-Cu covalent bonds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8878266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88782662022-02-26 The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation Li, Zihao Feng, Junli Wu, Zhangxi Pang, Mingjun Liu, Dong Yang, Wenchao Zhan, Yongzhong Materials (Basel) Article AuCu phase had a significant effect on the bonding strength of Au80Sn20 alloy and Cu substrate. The formation of the AuCu(200)/Cu(200) interface significantly improves the shear strength of solder joints. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the strengthening mechanism of the AuCu phase in the Cu matrix. The atomic structure, interfacial stability, and interfacial bonding properties of the Cu(200)/AuCu(200) interface were investigated using first-principle calculation. The layer spacing convergence results show that seven layers of Cu(200) surface and seven layers of AuCu(200) surface are enough thick to be chosen for the interface model. The calculation shows that the surface energies are 1.463 J/m(2) and 1.081 J/m(2) for AuCu(200) surface and Cu(200) surface, respectively. Four interface combinations of Top sit, Long bridge, Short bridge, and Hollow were investigated by considering four stacking methods of AuCu(200). It is shown that the interfacial configuration of the Long bridge is the most stable and favorable structure, which has the largest adhesion work, the smallest interfacial energy, and the smallest interfacial spacing. The density of states and electron difference density were calculated for the four interfacial configurations, and the results showed that the main bonding mode of the Long bridge interface is composed of both Cu-Cu covalent bonds and Au-Cu covalent bonds. MDPI 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8878266/ /pubmed/35208041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041506 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Zihao Feng, Junli Wu, Zhangxi Pang, Mingjun Liu, Dong Yang, Wenchao Zhan, Yongzhong The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation |
title | The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation |
title_full | The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation |
title_fullStr | The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation |
title_short | The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation |
title_sort | stability and electronic structure of cu(200)/aucu(200) interface: an insight from first-principle calculation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizihao thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT fengjunli thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT wuzhangxi thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT pangmingjun thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT liudong thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT yangwenchao thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT zhanyongzhong thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT lizihao stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT fengjunli stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT wuzhangxi stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT pangmingjun stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT liudong stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT yangwenchao stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation AT zhanyongzhong stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation |