Cargando…

The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation

AuCu phase had a significant effect on the bonding strength of Au80Sn20 alloy and Cu substrate. The formation of the AuCu(200)/Cu(200) interface significantly improves the shear strength of solder joints. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the strengthening mechanism of the AuCu phas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zihao, Feng, Junli, Wu, Zhangxi, Pang, Mingjun, Liu, Dong, Yang, Wenchao, Zhan, Yongzhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208041
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041506
_version_ 1784658620579840000
author Li, Zihao
Feng, Junli
Wu, Zhangxi
Pang, Mingjun
Liu, Dong
Yang, Wenchao
Zhan, Yongzhong
author_facet Li, Zihao
Feng, Junli
Wu, Zhangxi
Pang, Mingjun
Liu, Dong
Yang, Wenchao
Zhan, Yongzhong
author_sort Li, Zihao
collection PubMed
description AuCu phase had a significant effect on the bonding strength of Au80Sn20 alloy and Cu substrate. The formation of the AuCu(200)/Cu(200) interface significantly improves the shear strength of solder joints. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the strengthening mechanism of the AuCu phase in the Cu matrix. The atomic structure, interfacial stability, and interfacial bonding properties of the Cu(200)/AuCu(200) interface were investigated using first-principle calculation. The layer spacing convergence results show that seven layers of Cu(200) surface and seven layers of AuCu(200) surface are enough thick to be chosen for the interface model. The calculation shows that the surface energies are 1.463 J/m(2) and 1.081 J/m(2) for AuCu(200) surface and Cu(200) surface, respectively. Four interface combinations of Top sit, Long bridge, Short bridge, and Hollow were investigated by considering four stacking methods of AuCu(200). It is shown that the interfacial configuration of the Long bridge is the most stable and favorable structure, which has the largest adhesion work, the smallest interfacial energy, and the smallest interfacial spacing. The density of states and electron difference density were calculated for the four interfacial configurations, and the results showed that the main bonding mode of the Long bridge interface is composed of both Cu-Cu covalent bonds and Au-Cu covalent bonds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8878266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88782662022-02-26 The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation Li, Zihao Feng, Junli Wu, Zhangxi Pang, Mingjun Liu, Dong Yang, Wenchao Zhan, Yongzhong Materials (Basel) Article AuCu phase had a significant effect on the bonding strength of Au80Sn20 alloy and Cu substrate. The formation of the AuCu(200)/Cu(200) interface significantly improves the shear strength of solder joints. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the strengthening mechanism of the AuCu phase in the Cu matrix. The atomic structure, interfacial stability, and interfacial bonding properties of the Cu(200)/AuCu(200) interface were investigated using first-principle calculation. The layer spacing convergence results show that seven layers of Cu(200) surface and seven layers of AuCu(200) surface are enough thick to be chosen for the interface model. The calculation shows that the surface energies are 1.463 J/m(2) and 1.081 J/m(2) for AuCu(200) surface and Cu(200) surface, respectively. Four interface combinations of Top sit, Long bridge, Short bridge, and Hollow were investigated by considering four stacking methods of AuCu(200). It is shown that the interfacial configuration of the Long bridge is the most stable and favorable structure, which has the largest adhesion work, the smallest interfacial energy, and the smallest interfacial spacing. The density of states and electron difference density were calculated for the four interfacial configurations, and the results showed that the main bonding mode of the Long bridge interface is composed of both Cu-Cu covalent bonds and Au-Cu covalent bonds. MDPI 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8878266/ /pubmed/35208041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041506 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Zihao
Feng, Junli
Wu, Zhangxi
Pang, Mingjun
Liu, Dong
Yang, Wenchao
Zhan, Yongzhong
The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
title The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
title_full The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
title_fullStr The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
title_full_unstemmed The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
title_short The Stability and Electronic Structure of Cu(200)/AuCu(200) Interface: An Insight from First-Principle Calculation
title_sort stability and electronic structure of cu(200)/aucu(200) interface: an insight from first-principle calculation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8878266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35208041
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041506
work_keys_str_mv AT lizihao thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT fengjunli thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT wuzhangxi thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT pangmingjun thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT liudong thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT yangwenchao thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT zhanyongzhong thestabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT lizihao stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT fengjunli stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT wuzhangxi stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT pangmingjun stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT liudong stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT yangwenchao stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation
AT zhanyongzhong stabilityandelectronicstructureofcu200aucu200interfaceaninsightfromfirstprinciplecalculation