Cargando…
The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: As part of the process of updating national dietary reference values (DRVs) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 project (NNR2022) will select a limited number of topics for systematic reviews (SRs). OBJECTIVE: To develop and transparently...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Academia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291553 http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v65.7828 |
_version_ | 1784663548197076992 |
---|---|
author | Høyer, Anne Christensen, Jacob Juel Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer Andersen, Rikke Eneroth, Hanna Erkkola, Maijaliisa Lemming, Eva Warensjö Meltzer, Helle Margrete Halldórsson, Þórhallur Ingi Þórsdóttir, Inga Schwab, Ursula Trolle, Ellen Blomhoff, Rune |
author_facet | Høyer, Anne Christensen, Jacob Juel Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer Andersen, Rikke Eneroth, Hanna Erkkola, Maijaliisa Lemming, Eva Warensjö Meltzer, Helle Margrete Halldórsson, Þórhallur Ingi Þórsdóttir, Inga Schwab, Ursula Trolle, Ellen Blomhoff, Rune |
author_sort | Høyer, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As part of the process of updating national dietary reference values (DRVs) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 project (NNR2022) will select a limited number of topics for systematic reviews (SRs). OBJECTIVE: To develop and transparently describe the results of a procedure for prioritisation of topics that may be submitted for SRs in the NNR2022 project. DESIGN: In an open call, scientists, health professionals, national food and health authorities, food manufacturers, other stakeholders and the general population in the Nordic and Baltic countries were invited to suggest SR topics. The NNR2022 Committee developed scoping reviews (ScRs) for 51 nutrients and food groups aimed at identifying potential SR topics. These ScRs included the relevant nominations from the open call. SR topics were categorised, ranked and prioritised by the NNR2022 Committee in a modified Delphi process. Existing qualified SRs were identified to omit duplication. RESULTS: A total of 45 nominations with suggestion for more than 200 exposure–outcome pairs were received in the public call. A number of additional topics were identified in ScRs. In order to omit duplication with recently qualified SRs, we defined criteria and identified 76 qualified SRs. The NNR2022 Committee subsequently shortlisted 52 PI/ECOTSS statements, none of which overlapped with the qualified SRs. The PI/ECOTSS statements were then graded ‘High’ (n = 21), ‘Medium’ (n = 9) or ‘Low’ (n = 22) importance, and the PI/ECOTSS statements with ‘High’ were ranked in a Delphi process. The nine top prioritised PI/ECOTSS included the following exposure–outcome pairs: 1) plant protein intake in children and body growth, 2) pulses/legumes intake, and cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, 3) plant protein intake in adults, and atherosclerotic/cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, 4) fat quality and mental health, 5) vitamin B(12) and vitamin B(12) status, 6) intake of white meat (no consumption vs. high consumption and white meat replaced with red meat), and all-cause mortality, type 2 diabetes and risk factors, 7) intake of n-3 LPUFAs from supplements during pregnancy, and asthma and allergies in the offspring, 8) nuts intake and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes in adults, 9) dietary fibre intake (high vs. low) in children and bowel function. DISCUSSION: The selection of topics for de novo SRs is central in the NNR2022 project, as the results of these SRs may cause adjustment of existing DRVs and FBDGs. That is why we have developed this extensive process for the prioritisation of SR topics. For transparency, the results of the process are reported in this publication. CONCLUSION: The principles and methodologies developed in the NNR2022 project may serve as a framework for national health authorities or organisations when developing national DRVs and FBDGs. This collaboration between the food and health authorities in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden represents an international effort for harmonisation and sharing of resources and competence when developing national DRVs and FBDGs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Open Academia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88979822022-03-14 The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews Høyer, Anne Christensen, Jacob Juel Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer Andersen, Rikke Eneroth, Hanna Erkkola, Maijaliisa Lemming, Eva Warensjö Meltzer, Helle Margrete Halldórsson, Þórhallur Ingi Þórsdóttir, Inga Schwab, Ursula Trolle, Ellen Blomhoff, Rune Food Nutr Res Review Article BACKGROUND: As part of the process of updating national dietary reference values (DRVs) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 project (NNR2022) will select a limited number of topics for systematic reviews (SRs). OBJECTIVE: To develop and transparently describe the results of a procedure for prioritisation of topics that may be submitted for SRs in the NNR2022 project. DESIGN: In an open call, scientists, health professionals, national food and health authorities, food manufacturers, other stakeholders and the general population in the Nordic and Baltic countries were invited to suggest SR topics. The NNR2022 Committee developed scoping reviews (ScRs) for 51 nutrients and food groups aimed at identifying potential SR topics. These ScRs included the relevant nominations from the open call. SR topics were categorised, ranked and prioritised by the NNR2022 Committee in a modified Delphi process. Existing qualified SRs were identified to omit duplication. RESULTS: A total of 45 nominations with suggestion for more than 200 exposure–outcome pairs were received in the public call. A number of additional topics were identified in ScRs. In order to omit duplication with recently qualified SRs, we defined criteria and identified 76 qualified SRs. The NNR2022 Committee subsequently shortlisted 52 PI/ECOTSS statements, none of which overlapped with the qualified SRs. The PI/ECOTSS statements were then graded ‘High’ (n = 21), ‘Medium’ (n = 9) or ‘Low’ (n = 22) importance, and the PI/ECOTSS statements with ‘High’ were ranked in a Delphi process. The nine top prioritised PI/ECOTSS included the following exposure–outcome pairs: 1) plant protein intake in children and body growth, 2) pulses/legumes intake, and cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, 3) plant protein intake in adults, and atherosclerotic/cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, 4) fat quality and mental health, 5) vitamin B(12) and vitamin B(12) status, 6) intake of white meat (no consumption vs. high consumption and white meat replaced with red meat), and all-cause mortality, type 2 diabetes and risk factors, 7) intake of n-3 LPUFAs from supplements during pregnancy, and asthma and allergies in the offspring, 8) nuts intake and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes in adults, 9) dietary fibre intake (high vs. low) in children and bowel function. DISCUSSION: The selection of topics for de novo SRs is central in the NNR2022 project, as the results of these SRs may cause adjustment of existing DRVs and FBDGs. That is why we have developed this extensive process for the prioritisation of SR topics. For transparency, the results of the process are reported in this publication. CONCLUSION: The principles and methodologies developed in the NNR2022 project may serve as a framework for national health authorities or organisations when developing national DRVs and FBDGs. This collaboration between the food and health authorities in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden represents an international effort for harmonisation and sharing of resources and competence when developing national DRVs and FBDGs. Open Academia 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8897982/ /pubmed/35291553 http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v65.7828 Text en © 2021 Anne Høyer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Høyer, Anne Christensen, Jacob Juel Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer Andersen, Rikke Eneroth, Hanna Erkkola, Maijaliisa Lemming, Eva Warensjö Meltzer, Helle Margrete Halldórsson, Þórhallur Ingi Þórsdóttir, Inga Schwab, Ursula Trolle, Ellen Blomhoff, Rune The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
title | The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
title_full | The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
title_short | The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
title_sort | nordic nutrition recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291553 http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v65.7828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT høyeranne thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT christensenjacobjuel thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT arnesenerikkristoffer thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT andersenrikke thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT enerothhanna thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT erkkolamaijaliisa thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT lemmingevawarensjo thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT meltzerhellemargrete thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT halldorssonþorhalluringi thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT þorsdottiringa thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT schwabursula thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT trolleellen thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT blomhoffrune thenordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT høyeranne nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT christensenjacobjuel nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT arnesenerikkristoffer nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT andersenrikke nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT enerothhanna nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT erkkolamaijaliisa nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT lemmingevawarensjo nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT meltzerhellemargrete nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT halldorssonþorhalluringi nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT þorsdottiringa nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT schwabursula nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT trolleellen nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews AT blomhoffrune nordicnutritionrecommendations2022prioritisationoftopicsfordenovosystematicreviews |