Cargando…

Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams

BACKGROUND: Debriefing is an essential skill for simulation educators and feedback for debriefers is recognised as important in progression to mastery. Existing assessment tools, such as the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), may assist in rating performance but their utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coggins, Andrew, Hong, Sun Song, Baliga, Kaushik, Halamek, Louis P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6
_version_ 1784663915927437312
author Coggins, Andrew
Hong, Sun Song
Baliga, Kaushik
Halamek, Louis P.
author_facet Coggins, Andrew
Hong, Sun Song
Baliga, Kaushik
Halamek, Louis P.
author_sort Coggins, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Debriefing is an essential skill for simulation educators and feedback for debriefers is recognised as important in progression to mastery. Existing assessment tools, such as the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), may assist in rating performance but their utility is limited by subjectivity and complexity. Use of quantitative data measurements for feedback has been shown to improve performance of clinicians but has not been studied as a focus for debriefer feedback. METHODS: A multi-centre sample of interdisciplinary debriefings was observed. Total debriefing time, length of individual contributions and demographics were recorded. DASH scores from simulation participants, debriefers and supervising faculty were collected after each event. Conversational diagrams were drawn in real-time by supervising faculty using an approach described by Dieckmann. For each debriefing, the data points listed above were compiled on a single page and then used as a focus for feedback to the debriefer. RESULTS: Twelve debriefings were included (µ = 6.5 simulation participants per event). Debriefers receiving feedback from supervising faculty were physicians or nurses with a range of experience (n = 7). In 9/12 cases the ratio of debriefer to simulation participant contribution length was ≧ 1:1. The diagrams for these debriefings typically resembled a fan-shape. Debriefings (n = 3) with a ratio < 1:1 received higher DASH ratings compared with the ≧ 1:1 group (p = 0.038). These debriefings generated star-shaped diagrams. Debriefer self-rated DASH scores (µ = 5.08/7.0) were lower than simulation participant scores (µ = 6.50/7.0). The differences reached statistical significance for all 6 DASH elements. Debriefers evaluated the ‘usefulness’ of feedback and rated it ‘highly’ (µ= 4.6/5). CONCLUSION: Basic quantitative data measures collected during debriefings may represent a useful focus for immediate debriefer feedback in a healthcare simulation setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88994512022-03-07 Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams Coggins, Andrew Hong, Sun Song Baliga, Kaushik Halamek, Louis P. Adv Simul (Lond) Innovation BACKGROUND: Debriefing is an essential skill for simulation educators and feedback for debriefers is recognised as important in progression to mastery. Existing assessment tools, such as the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), may assist in rating performance but their utility is limited by subjectivity and complexity. Use of quantitative data measurements for feedback has been shown to improve performance of clinicians but has not been studied as a focus for debriefer feedback. METHODS: A multi-centre sample of interdisciplinary debriefings was observed. Total debriefing time, length of individual contributions and demographics were recorded. DASH scores from simulation participants, debriefers and supervising faculty were collected after each event. Conversational diagrams were drawn in real-time by supervising faculty using an approach described by Dieckmann. For each debriefing, the data points listed above were compiled on a single page and then used as a focus for feedback to the debriefer. RESULTS: Twelve debriefings were included (µ = 6.5 simulation participants per event). Debriefers receiving feedback from supervising faculty were physicians or nurses with a range of experience (n = 7). In 9/12 cases the ratio of debriefer to simulation participant contribution length was ≧ 1:1. The diagrams for these debriefings typically resembled a fan-shape. Debriefings (n = 3) with a ratio < 1:1 received higher DASH ratings compared with the ≧ 1:1 group (p = 0.038). These debriefings generated star-shaped diagrams. Debriefer self-rated DASH scores (µ = 5.08/7.0) were lower than simulation participant scores (µ = 6.50/7.0). The differences reached statistical significance for all 6 DASH elements. Debriefers evaluated the ‘usefulness’ of feedback and rated it ‘highly’ (µ= 4.6/5). CONCLUSION: Basic quantitative data measures collected during debriefings may represent a useful focus for immediate debriefer feedback in a healthcare simulation setting. BioMed Central 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8899451/ /pubmed/35256014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Innovation
Coggins, Andrew
Hong, Sun Song
Baliga, Kaushik
Halamek, Louis P.
Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
title Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
title_full Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
title_fullStr Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
title_full_unstemmed Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
title_short Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
title_sort immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams
topic Innovation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cogginsandrew immediatefacultyfeedbackusingdebriefingtimingdataandconversationaldiagrams
AT hongsunsong immediatefacultyfeedbackusingdebriefingtimingdataandconversationaldiagrams
AT baligakaushik immediatefacultyfeedbackusingdebriefingtimingdataandconversationaldiagrams
AT halameklouisp immediatefacultyfeedbackusingdebriefingtimingdataandconversationaldiagrams