Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) method for detecting POLE mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and guiding its molecular classification. METHODS: We reviewed 240 EC specimens from our hospital database. A ddPCR assay was used to identify POLE mutations at 5...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: We evaluated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) method for detecting POLE mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and guiding its molecular classification. METHODS: We reviewed 240 EC specimens from our hospital database. A ddPCR assay was used to identify POLE mutations at 5 known hotspots (P286R, S297F, V411L, A456P, and S459F). Expressions of p53 and mismatch repair proteins were identified using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The ddPCR assay identified POLE mutations in 10.8% of patients. The most common mutation was V411L (61.54%), followed by P286R (23.07%), S459F (7.69%), S297F (3.85%), and A456P (3.85%). Eight/one cases had positive ddPCR but negative Sanger sequencing/next-generation sequencing, respectively. Molecular classification revealed p53-mutated subtype as significantly more common for tumors with a high International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, advanced stage, and high/advanced risk groups; the POLE mutated group was more frequent in the low stage and low/intermediate risk group. Survival analyses revealed the poorest outcomes for p53-mutated EC, while mismatch repair-deficient and no specific molecular profile ECs had similar progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes, and POLE-mutated ECs had the best PFS outcome (p<0.001). When only intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups were analyzed for subgroups, molecular classification still showed differences both in PFS (p=0.003) and overall survival (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Hotspot POLE mutations can be detected using the ddPCR assay. We suggest simultaneously evaluating POLE mutation status using ddPCR and p53/mismatch repair protein expressions using immunohistochemistry, which can rapidly and accurately determine the molecular subtype of EC. |
---|