Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) method for detecting POLE mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and guiding its molecular classification. METHODS: We reviewed 240 EC specimens from our hospital database. A ddPCR assay was used to identify POLE mutations at 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Gilhyang, Lee, Song Kook, Suh, Dong Hoon, Kim, Kidong, No, Jae Hong, Kim, Yong Beom, Kim, Hyojin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15
_version_ 1784664004203905024
author Kim, Gilhyang
Lee, Song Kook
Suh, Dong Hoon
Kim, Kidong
No, Jae Hong
Kim, Yong Beom
Kim, Hyojin
author_facet Kim, Gilhyang
Lee, Song Kook
Suh, Dong Hoon
Kim, Kidong
No, Jae Hong
Kim, Yong Beom
Kim, Hyojin
author_sort Kim, Gilhyang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We evaluated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) method for detecting POLE mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and guiding its molecular classification. METHODS: We reviewed 240 EC specimens from our hospital database. A ddPCR assay was used to identify POLE mutations at 5 known hotspots (P286R, S297F, V411L, A456P, and S459F). Expressions of p53 and mismatch repair proteins were identified using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The ddPCR assay identified POLE mutations in 10.8% of patients. The most common mutation was V411L (61.54%), followed by P286R (23.07%), S459F (7.69%), S297F (3.85%), and A456P (3.85%). Eight/one cases had positive ddPCR but negative Sanger sequencing/next-generation sequencing, respectively. Molecular classification revealed p53-mutated subtype as significantly more common for tumors with a high International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, advanced stage, and high/advanced risk groups; the POLE mutated group was more frequent in the low stage and low/intermediate risk group. Survival analyses revealed the poorest outcomes for p53-mutated EC, while mismatch repair-deficient and no specific molecular profile ECs had similar progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes, and POLE-mutated ECs had the best PFS outcome (p<0.001). When only intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups were analyzed for subgroups, molecular classification still showed differences both in PFS (p=0.003) and overall survival (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Hotspot POLE mutations can be detected using the ddPCR assay. We suggest simultaneously evaluating POLE mutation status using ddPCR and p53/mismatch repair protein expressions using immunohistochemistry, which can rapidly and accurately determine the molecular subtype of EC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88998772022-03-11 Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer Kim, Gilhyang Lee, Song Kook Suh, Dong Hoon Kim, Kidong No, Jae Hong Kim, Yong Beom Kim, Hyojin J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: We evaluated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) method for detecting POLE mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and guiding its molecular classification. METHODS: We reviewed 240 EC specimens from our hospital database. A ddPCR assay was used to identify POLE mutations at 5 known hotspots (P286R, S297F, V411L, A456P, and S459F). Expressions of p53 and mismatch repair proteins were identified using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The ddPCR assay identified POLE mutations in 10.8% of patients. The most common mutation was V411L (61.54%), followed by P286R (23.07%), S459F (7.69%), S297F (3.85%), and A456P (3.85%). Eight/one cases had positive ddPCR but negative Sanger sequencing/next-generation sequencing, respectively. Molecular classification revealed p53-mutated subtype as significantly more common for tumors with a high International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, advanced stage, and high/advanced risk groups; the POLE mutated group was more frequent in the low stage and low/intermediate risk group. Survival analyses revealed the poorest outcomes for p53-mutated EC, while mismatch repair-deficient and no specific molecular profile ECs had similar progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes, and POLE-mutated ECs had the best PFS outcome (p<0.001). When only intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups were analyzed for subgroups, molecular classification still showed differences both in PFS (p=0.003) and overall survival (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Hotspot POLE mutations can be detected using the ddPCR assay. We suggest simultaneously evaluating POLE mutation status using ddPCR and p53/mismatch repair protein expressions using immunohistochemistry, which can rapidly and accurately determine the molecular subtype of EC. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8899877/ /pubmed/34910396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15 Text en Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Gilhyang
Lee, Song Kook
Suh, Dong Hoon
Kim, Kidong
No, Jae Hong
Kim, Yong Beom
Kim, Hyojin
Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
title Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
title_full Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
title_short Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting POLE mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
title_sort clinical evaluation of a droplet digital pcr assay for detecting pole mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgilhyang clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer
AT leesongkook clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer
AT suhdonghoon clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer
AT kimkidong clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer
AT nojaehong clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer
AT kimyongbeom clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer
AT kimhyojin clinicalevaluationofadropletdigitalpcrassayfordetectingpolemutationsandmolecularclassificationofendometrialcancer