Cargando…

Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching

BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) facilitates medical education and has reduced in practice, often due to patient-related concerns. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire exploring patients attitudes towards BST. METHODS: International guidelines for questionnaire development were followed. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carey, MO, O’Riordan, N, Carty, M, Ivers, M, Taylor, LK, Higgins, MF
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03192-2
_version_ 1784664039653113856
author Carey, MO
O’Riordan, N
Carty, M
Ivers, M
Taylor, LK
Higgins, MF
author_facet Carey, MO
O’Riordan, N
Carty, M
Ivers, M
Taylor, LK
Higgins, MF
author_sort Carey, MO
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) facilitates medical education and has reduced in practice, often due to patient-related concerns. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire exploring patients attitudes towards BST. METHODS: International guidelines for questionnaire development were followed. Seven steps were included: literature review, patient interviews, development of clear and understandable items, expert validation, cognitive interviewing and pilot testing. Statistical analyses included exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, investigation of demographic influences and discriminant validity across subscales. RESULTS: Following the literature review, 32 interviews were conducted. Potential items were developed, reviewed and adapted. Experts in medical education and statistics reviewed the draft questionnaire. Fifteen patients consented to cognitive testing and 401 consenting patients completed the final version. The median age of participants was 35 years of age (range: 18 to 70 years). Participants included women attending for antenatal (40%), postnatal (32%) and gynaecology issues (28%). Just under one third (29%) had taken part in medical student teaching previously. Statistical analyses found a two-factor solution, consisting of Educate medical professionals and Conditions for participation subscales with good internal consistency; responses did not vary by age or education. Participants who had opted-in for teaching in the ward and bedside endorsed higher levels of Educate medical professionals, suggesting discriminant validity. A majority of patients (> 92%) reported that they were happy to be involved in BST. Patients believed that they should not be asked to participate in BST should they feel stressed or unwell (68.2%). CONCLUSION: This study shows extensive patient support for BST, independent of age or education. The desire to educate is a strong motivating factor. This strong support by patients for BST is an area that medical schools and universities can potentially develop. Future versions of this questionnaire may include virtual bedside teaching, in the context of social distancing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89001002022-03-07 Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching Carey, MO O’Riordan, N Carty, M Ivers, M Taylor, LK Higgins, MF BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) facilitates medical education and has reduced in practice, often due to patient-related concerns. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire exploring patients attitudes towards BST. METHODS: International guidelines for questionnaire development were followed. Seven steps were included: literature review, patient interviews, development of clear and understandable items, expert validation, cognitive interviewing and pilot testing. Statistical analyses included exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, investigation of demographic influences and discriminant validity across subscales. RESULTS: Following the literature review, 32 interviews were conducted. Potential items were developed, reviewed and adapted. Experts in medical education and statistics reviewed the draft questionnaire. Fifteen patients consented to cognitive testing and 401 consenting patients completed the final version. The median age of participants was 35 years of age (range: 18 to 70 years). Participants included women attending for antenatal (40%), postnatal (32%) and gynaecology issues (28%). Just under one third (29%) had taken part in medical student teaching previously. Statistical analyses found a two-factor solution, consisting of Educate medical professionals and Conditions for participation subscales with good internal consistency; responses did not vary by age or education. Participants who had opted-in for teaching in the ward and bedside endorsed higher levels of Educate medical professionals, suggesting discriminant validity. A majority of patients (> 92%) reported that they were happy to be involved in BST. Patients believed that they should not be asked to participate in BST should they feel stressed or unwell (68.2%). CONCLUSION: This study shows extensive patient support for BST, independent of age or education. The desire to educate is a strong motivating factor. This strong support by patients for BST is an area that medical schools and universities can potentially develop. Future versions of this questionnaire may include virtual bedside teaching, in the context of social distancing. BioMed Central 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8900100/ /pubmed/35255874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03192-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Carey, MO
O’Riordan, N
Carty, M
Ivers, M
Taylor, LK
Higgins, MF
Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
title Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
title_full Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
title_fullStr Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
title_short Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
title_sort validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03192-2
work_keys_str_mv AT careymo validationofaquestionnaireexploringpatientattitudestowardsbedsideteaching
AT oriordann validationofaquestionnaireexploringpatientattitudestowardsbedsideteaching
AT cartym validationofaquestionnaireexploringpatientattitudestowardsbedsideteaching
AT iversm validationofaquestionnaireexploringpatientattitudestowardsbedsideteaching
AT taylorlk validationofaquestionnaireexploringpatientattitudestowardsbedsideteaching
AT higginsmf validationofaquestionnaireexploringpatientattitudestowardsbedsideteaching