Cargando…
A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit
BACKGROUND: The clinical teaching unit is a widespread clinical training model that requires reform to prepare physicians for practice in the 21st century. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify evidence-based practices in internal medicine clinical teaching units that contribute to improve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202400 |
_version_ | 1784664206697562112 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Brandon Sandarage, Ryan Chai, Jocelyn Dawson, Kristin Anne Dutkiewicz, Katrina Rose Saad, Stephan Kitchin, Vanessa Hatala, Rose McCormick, Iain Kassen, Barry |
author_facet | Tang, Brandon Sandarage, Ryan Chai, Jocelyn Dawson, Kristin Anne Dutkiewicz, Katrina Rose Saad, Stephan Kitchin, Vanessa Hatala, Rose McCormick, Iain Kassen, Barry |
author_sort | Tang, Brandon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical teaching unit is a widespread clinical training model that requires reform to prepare physicians for practice in the 21st century. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify evidence-based practices in internal medicine clinical teaching units that contribute to improved clinical education and health care delivery. METHODS: We searched several databases from 1993 until Apr. 5, 2021, to identify published studies in inpatient clinical teaching units that involved medical trainees and reported outcomes related to trainee education or health care delivery. We identified emergent themes using a narrative approach and determined confidence in review findings using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) methodology. RESULTS: We included 107 studies of internal medicine clinical teaching units, of which 93 (87%) were conducted in North America. Surveys (n = 31, 29%), trials (n = 17, 16%) and narrative studies (n = 15, 14%) were the most prevalent study designs. Practices identified as contributing to improved clinical education or health care delivery included purposeful rounding (high confidence), bedside rounding (moderate confidence), resource stewardship interventions (high confidence), interprofessional rounds (moderate confidence), geographic wards (moderate confidence), allocating more trainee time to patient care or educational activities (moderate confidence), “drip” continuous models of admission (moderate confidence), limiting duty hours (moderate confidence) and limiting clinical workload (moderate confidence). INTERPRETATION: In this review, we identified several evidence-based practices that may contribute to improved educational and health care outcomes in clinical teaching unit settings. These findings may offer guidance for policies, resource allocation and staffing of teaching hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8900805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89008052022-03-11 A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit Tang, Brandon Sandarage, Ryan Chai, Jocelyn Dawson, Kristin Anne Dutkiewicz, Katrina Rose Saad, Stephan Kitchin, Vanessa Hatala, Rose McCormick, Iain Kassen, Barry CMAJ Research BACKGROUND: The clinical teaching unit is a widespread clinical training model that requires reform to prepare physicians for practice in the 21st century. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify evidence-based practices in internal medicine clinical teaching units that contribute to improved clinical education and health care delivery. METHODS: We searched several databases from 1993 until Apr. 5, 2021, to identify published studies in inpatient clinical teaching units that involved medical trainees and reported outcomes related to trainee education or health care delivery. We identified emergent themes using a narrative approach and determined confidence in review findings using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) methodology. RESULTS: We included 107 studies of internal medicine clinical teaching units, of which 93 (87%) were conducted in North America. Surveys (n = 31, 29%), trials (n = 17, 16%) and narrative studies (n = 15, 14%) were the most prevalent study designs. Practices identified as contributing to improved clinical education or health care delivery included purposeful rounding (high confidence), bedside rounding (moderate confidence), resource stewardship interventions (high confidence), interprofessional rounds (moderate confidence), geographic wards (moderate confidence), allocating more trainee time to patient care or educational activities (moderate confidence), “drip” continuous models of admission (moderate confidence), limiting duty hours (moderate confidence) and limiting clinical workload (moderate confidence). INTERPRETATION: In this review, we identified several evidence-based practices that may contribute to improved educational and health care outcomes in clinical teaching unit settings. These findings may offer guidance for policies, resource allocation and staffing of teaching hospitals. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-02-14 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8900805/ /pubmed/35165130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202400 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Tang, Brandon Sandarage, Ryan Chai, Jocelyn Dawson, Kristin Anne Dutkiewicz, Katrina Rose Saad, Stephan Kitchin, Vanessa Hatala, Rose McCormick, Iain Kassen, Barry A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
title | A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
title_full | A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
title_short | A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
title_sort | systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangbrandon asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT sandarageryan asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT chaijocelyn asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT dawsonkristinanne asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT dutkiewiczkatrinarose asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT saadstephan asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT kitchinvanessa asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT hatalarose asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT mccormickiain asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT kassenbarry asystematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT tangbrandon systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT sandarageryan systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT chaijocelyn systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT dawsonkristinanne systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT dutkiewiczkatrinarose systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT saadstephan systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT kitchinvanessa systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT hatalarose systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT mccormickiain systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit AT kassenbarry systematicreviewofevidencebasedpracticesforclinicaleducationandhealthcaredeliveryintheclinicalteachingunit |