Cargando…

Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status

The prototypical stimuli for umami taste is monosodium glutamate (MSG), which is the sodium salt form of glutamic acid. A proportion of the population has a reduced or complete inability to taste l-glutamate independent to the sodium ion. To determine individuals’ umami discrimination status, many s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartley, Isabella, Orellana, Liliana, Liem, Djin Gie, Keast, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjac003
_version_ 1784664234137747456
author Hartley, Isabella
Orellana, Liliana
Liem, Djin Gie
Keast, Russell
author_facet Hartley, Isabella
Orellana, Liliana
Liem, Djin Gie
Keast, Russell
author_sort Hartley, Isabella
collection PubMed
description The prototypical stimuli for umami taste is monosodium glutamate (MSG), which is the sodium salt form of glutamic acid. A proportion of the population has a reduced or complete inability to taste l-glutamate independent to the sodium ion. To determine individuals’ umami discrimination status, many studies use a series of triangle tests containing isomolar (29 mM) sodium chloride (NaCl) and MSG, requiring participants to correctly identify the odd sample. Across studies, inconsistent categorization criteria have been applied. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal classification criterion based on the number of tests assessed to ascertain an individual’s ability to discriminate between MSG and NaCl. Thirty-eight participants attended 3 taste assessment sessions, each involving 24 triangle tests (2 blocks of 12 tests) containing 29 mM NaCl and 29 mM MSG, detection and recognition threshold were measured for MSG, monopotassium glutamate (MPG), and sweet (sucrose) tastes. There was no learning, or fatigue trend over n = 24 (P = 0.228), and n = 12 (P = 0.940) triangle tests across each testing session. Twenty-four triangle tests produced the most consistent categorization of tasters across sessions (68.4%). The test–retest correlation across each testing session was highest for n = 24 triangle tests (ICC = 0.50), in comparison to 12 (ICC = 0.37). Overall, conducting n = 24 compared with n = 12 triangle tests provided the optimal classification to determine an individual’s ability to discriminate l-glutamate from NaCl and thus their umami discrimination status, based on the number of tests assessed in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89009252022-03-08 Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status Hartley, Isabella Orellana, Liliana Liem, Djin Gie Keast, Russell Chem Senses Original Article The prototypical stimuli for umami taste is monosodium glutamate (MSG), which is the sodium salt form of glutamic acid. A proportion of the population has a reduced or complete inability to taste l-glutamate independent to the sodium ion. To determine individuals’ umami discrimination status, many studies use a series of triangle tests containing isomolar (29 mM) sodium chloride (NaCl) and MSG, requiring participants to correctly identify the odd sample. Across studies, inconsistent categorization criteria have been applied. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal classification criterion based on the number of tests assessed to ascertain an individual’s ability to discriminate between MSG and NaCl. Thirty-eight participants attended 3 taste assessment sessions, each involving 24 triangle tests (2 blocks of 12 tests) containing 29 mM NaCl and 29 mM MSG, detection and recognition threshold were measured for MSG, monopotassium glutamate (MPG), and sweet (sucrose) tastes. There was no learning, or fatigue trend over n = 24 (P = 0.228), and n = 12 (P = 0.940) triangle tests across each testing session. Twenty-four triangle tests produced the most consistent categorization of tasters across sessions (68.4%). The test–retest correlation across each testing session was highest for n = 24 triangle tests (ICC = 0.50), in comparison to 12 (ICC = 0.37). Overall, conducting n = 24 compared with n = 12 triangle tests provided the optimal classification to determine an individual’s ability to discriminate l-glutamate from NaCl and thus their umami discrimination status, based on the number of tests assessed in this study. Oxford University Press 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8900925/ /pubmed/35255134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjac003 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Hartley, Isabella
Orellana, Liliana
Liem, Djin Gie
Keast, Russell
Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
title Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
title_full Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
title_fullStr Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
title_short Assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
title_sort assessment of the triangle test methodology for determining umami discrimination status
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjac003
work_keys_str_mv AT hartleyisabella assessmentofthetriangletestmethodologyfordeterminingumamidiscriminationstatus
AT orellanaliliana assessmentofthetriangletestmethodologyfordeterminingumamidiscriminationstatus
AT liemdjingie assessmentofthetriangletestmethodologyfordeterminingumamidiscriminationstatus
AT keastrussell assessmentofthetriangletestmethodologyfordeterminingumamidiscriminationstatus