Cargando…

Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol

INTRODUCTION: UK higher education (HE) student numbers are increasing and students report higher levels of mental health and well-being issues. Social prescribing links individuals to community-based, non-medical support. It is widely implemented throughout the UK, and is supported by the Welsh Gove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Sarah, Wallace, Carolyn, Elliott, Megan, Davies, Mark, Pontin, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052860
_version_ 1784668001456357376
author Wallace, Sarah
Wallace, Carolyn
Elliott, Megan
Davies, Mark
Pontin, David
author_facet Wallace, Sarah
Wallace, Carolyn
Elliott, Megan
Davies, Mark
Pontin, David
author_sort Wallace, Sarah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: UK higher education (HE) student numbers are increasing and students report higher levels of mental health and well-being issues. Social prescribing links individuals to community-based, non-medical support. It is widely implemented throughout the UK, and is supported by the Welsh Government. This protocol presents an evaluation of a new social prescribing service to enhance student well-being, a first for UK HE students. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A realist evaluation to articulate why, how and to what extent and circumstances social prescribing works for students, using a mixed-methods sequential design of four cycles. Cycle 1 informs the model and programme theory development of how the model works; activities include a Realist Review, Group Concept Mapping and producing bilingual short films about the evaluation and model. Cycle 2 involves secondary analysis of routine service data, and outcome measurements from students receiving a social prescription. Cycle 3 uses reflective diaries and qualitative realist interviews with stakeholders to understand the process and outcome of the model. Cycle 4 concludes with a world café workshop with stakeholders to agree and finalise the framework specification of ‘how, why, when and to what extent’ the model works. A meta-matrix construction will determine convergence, complementarity or discrepancy across the cycles. An advisory group of key stakeholders informs each cycle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: University of South Wales Life Sciences and Education Ethics Committee and Wrexham Glyndwr University (WGU) Research Ethics Sub-Committee approved secondary data analysis of participant demographics (200 805LRL:USW, id441:WGU), outcome measurement tools (200 902LR:USW, id441:WGU) and qualitative data collection (200 804LR:USW, id449:WGU). The authors will publish findings in peer-reviewed journals, produce an evaluation report to the funder and a short film for dissemination via stakeholders, university networks, United Nations Regional Centre of Expertise in Wales, PRIME Centre Wales, Wales School for Social Prescribing Research, conferences and social media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89153492022-03-25 Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol Wallace, Sarah Wallace, Carolyn Elliott, Megan Davies, Mark Pontin, David BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: UK higher education (HE) student numbers are increasing and students report higher levels of mental health and well-being issues. Social prescribing links individuals to community-based, non-medical support. It is widely implemented throughout the UK, and is supported by the Welsh Government. This protocol presents an evaluation of a new social prescribing service to enhance student well-being, a first for UK HE students. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A realist evaluation to articulate why, how and to what extent and circumstances social prescribing works for students, using a mixed-methods sequential design of four cycles. Cycle 1 informs the model and programme theory development of how the model works; activities include a Realist Review, Group Concept Mapping and producing bilingual short films about the evaluation and model. Cycle 2 involves secondary analysis of routine service data, and outcome measurements from students receiving a social prescription. Cycle 3 uses reflective diaries and qualitative realist interviews with stakeholders to understand the process and outcome of the model. Cycle 4 concludes with a world café workshop with stakeholders to agree and finalise the framework specification of ‘how, why, when and to what extent’ the model works. A meta-matrix construction will determine convergence, complementarity or discrepancy across the cycles. An advisory group of key stakeholders informs each cycle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: University of South Wales Life Sciences and Education Ethics Committee and Wrexham Glyndwr University (WGU) Research Ethics Sub-Committee approved secondary data analysis of participant demographics (200 805LRL:USW, id441:WGU), outcome measurement tools (200 902LR:USW, id441:WGU) and qualitative data collection (200 804LR:USW, id449:WGU). The authors will publish findings in peer-reviewed journals, produce an evaluation report to the funder and a short film for dissemination via stakeholders, university networks, United Nations Regional Centre of Expertise in Wales, PRIME Centre Wales, Wales School for Social Prescribing Research, conferences and social media. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8915349/ /pubmed/35273044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052860 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Wallace, Sarah
Wallace, Carolyn
Elliott, Megan
Davies, Mark
Pontin, David
Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
title Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
title_full Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
title_fullStr Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
title_short Enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
title_sort enhancing higher education student well-being through social prescribing: a realist evaluation protocol
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052860
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacesarah enhancinghighereducationstudentwellbeingthroughsocialprescribingarealistevaluationprotocol
AT wallacecarolyn enhancinghighereducationstudentwellbeingthroughsocialprescribingarealistevaluationprotocol
AT elliottmegan enhancinghighereducationstudentwellbeingthroughsocialprescribingarealistevaluationprotocol
AT daviesmark enhancinghighereducationstudentwellbeingthroughsocialprescribingarealistevaluationprotocol
AT pontindavid enhancinghighereducationstudentwellbeingthroughsocialprescribingarealistevaluationprotocol