Cargando…
Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials
BACKGROUND: For medical conditions with numerous interventions worthy of investigation, there are many advantages of a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) platform trial approach. However, there is currently limited knowledge on uptake of the MAMS design, especially in the late-phase setting. We sought to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055615 |
_version_ | 1784668006203260928 |
---|---|
author | Noor, Nurulamin M Love, Sharon B Isaacs, Talia Kaplan, Richard Parmar, Mahesh K B Sydes, Matthew R |
author_facet | Noor, Nurulamin M Love, Sharon B Isaacs, Talia Kaplan, Richard Parmar, Mahesh K B Sydes, Matthew R |
author_sort | Noor, Nurulamin M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For medical conditions with numerous interventions worthy of investigation, there are many advantages of a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) platform trial approach. However, there is currently limited knowledge on uptake of the MAMS design, especially in the late-phase setting. We sought to examine uptake and characteristics of late-phase MAMS platform trials, to enable better planning for teams considering future use of this approach. DESIGN: We examined uptake of registered, late-phase MAMS platforms in the EU clinical trials register, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform and databases: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Global Health Library and EMBASE. Searching was performed and review data frozen on 1 April 2021. MAMS platforms were defined as requiring two or more comparison arms, with two or more trial stages, with an interim analysis allowing for stopping of recruitment to arms and typically the ability to add new intervention arms. RESULTS: 62 late-phase clinical trials using an MAMS approach were included. Overall, the number of late-phase trials using the MAMS design has been increasing since 2001 and been accelerated by COVID-19. The majority of current MAMS platforms were either targeting infectious diseases (52%) or cancers (29%) and all identified trials were for treatment interventions. 89% (55/62) of MAMS platforms were evaluating medications, with 45% (28/62) of the MAMS platforms having at least one or more repurposed medication as a comparison arm. CONCLUSIONS: Historically, late-phase trials have adhered to long-established standard (two-arm) designs. However, the number of late-phase MAMS platform trials is increasing, across a range of different disease areas. This study highlights the potential scope of MAMS platform trials and may assist research teams considering use of this approach in the late-phase randomised clinical trial setting. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019153910. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89153712022-03-25 Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials Noor, Nurulamin M Love, Sharon B Isaacs, Talia Kaplan, Richard Parmar, Mahesh K B Sydes, Matthew R BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics BACKGROUND: For medical conditions with numerous interventions worthy of investigation, there are many advantages of a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) platform trial approach. However, there is currently limited knowledge on uptake of the MAMS design, especially in the late-phase setting. We sought to examine uptake and characteristics of late-phase MAMS platform trials, to enable better planning for teams considering future use of this approach. DESIGN: We examined uptake of registered, late-phase MAMS platforms in the EU clinical trials register, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform and databases: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Global Health Library and EMBASE. Searching was performed and review data frozen on 1 April 2021. MAMS platforms were defined as requiring two or more comparison arms, with two or more trial stages, with an interim analysis allowing for stopping of recruitment to arms and typically the ability to add new intervention arms. RESULTS: 62 late-phase clinical trials using an MAMS approach were included. Overall, the number of late-phase trials using the MAMS design has been increasing since 2001 and been accelerated by COVID-19. The majority of current MAMS platforms were either targeting infectious diseases (52%) or cancers (29%) and all identified trials were for treatment interventions. 89% (55/62) of MAMS platforms were evaluating medications, with 45% (28/62) of the MAMS platforms having at least one or more repurposed medication as a comparison arm. CONCLUSIONS: Historically, late-phase trials have adhered to long-established standard (two-arm) designs. However, the number of late-phase MAMS platform trials is increasing, across a range of different disease areas. This study highlights the potential scope of MAMS platform trials and may assist research teams considering use of this approach in the late-phase randomised clinical trial setting. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019153910. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8915371/ /pubmed/35273052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055615 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology and Therapeutics Noor, Nurulamin M Love, Sharon B Isaacs, Talia Kaplan, Richard Parmar, Mahesh K B Sydes, Matthew R Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
title | Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
title_full | Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
title_short | Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
title_sort | uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (mams) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials |
topic | Pharmacology and Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noornurulaminm uptakeofthemultiarmmultistagemamsadaptiveplatformapproachatrialregistryreviewoflatephaserandomisedclinicaltrials AT lovesharonb uptakeofthemultiarmmultistagemamsadaptiveplatformapproachatrialregistryreviewoflatephaserandomisedclinicaltrials AT isaacstalia uptakeofthemultiarmmultistagemamsadaptiveplatformapproachatrialregistryreviewoflatephaserandomisedclinicaltrials AT kaplanrichard uptakeofthemultiarmmultistagemamsadaptiveplatformapproachatrialregistryreviewoflatephaserandomisedclinicaltrials AT parmarmaheshkb uptakeofthemultiarmmultistagemamsadaptiveplatformapproachatrialregistryreviewoflatephaserandomisedclinicaltrials AT sydesmatthewr uptakeofthemultiarmmultistagemamsadaptiveplatformapproachatrialregistryreviewoflatephaserandomisedclinicaltrials |