Cargando…
The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures
BACKGROUND: Chemogenomic profiling is a powerful approach for understanding the genome-wide cellular response to small molecules. First developed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chemogenomic screens provide direct, unbiased identification of drug target candidates as well as genes required for drug res...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08395-x |
_version_ | 1784668034627010560 |
---|---|
author | Barazandeh, Marjan Kriti, Divya Nislow, Corey Giaever, Guri |
author_facet | Barazandeh, Marjan Kriti, Divya Nislow, Corey Giaever, Guri |
author_sort | Barazandeh, Marjan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chemogenomic profiling is a powerful approach for understanding the genome-wide cellular response to small molecules. First developed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chemogenomic screens provide direct, unbiased identification of drug target candidates as well as genes required for drug resistance. While many laboratories have performed chemogenomic fitness assays, few have been assessed for reproducibility and accuracy. Here we analyze the two largest independent yeast chemogenomic datasets comprising over 35 million gene-drug interactions and more than 6000 unique chemogenomic profiles; the first from our own academic laboratory (HIPLAB) and the second from the Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research (NIBR). RESULTS: Despite substantial differences in experimental and analytical pipelines, the combined datasets revealed robust chemogenomic response signatures, characterized by gene signatures, enrichment for biological processes and mechanisms of drug action. We previously reported that the cellular response to small molecules is limited and can be described by a network of 45 chemogenomic signatures. In the present study, we show that the majority of these signatures (66%) are also found in the companion dataset, providing further support for their biological relevance as conserved systems-level, small molecule response systems. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the robustness of chemogenomic fitness profiling in yeast, while offering guidelines for performing other high-dimensional comparisons including parallel CRISPR screens in mammalian cells. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08395-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89154882022-03-18 The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures Barazandeh, Marjan Kriti, Divya Nislow, Corey Giaever, Guri BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Chemogenomic profiling is a powerful approach for understanding the genome-wide cellular response to small molecules. First developed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chemogenomic screens provide direct, unbiased identification of drug target candidates as well as genes required for drug resistance. While many laboratories have performed chemogenomic fitness assays, few have been assessed for reproducibility and accuracy. Here we analyze the two largest independent yeast chemogenomic datasets comprising over 35 million gene-drug interactions and more than 6000 unique chemogenomic profiles; the first from our own academic laboratory (HIPLAB) and the second from the Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research (NIBR). RESULTS: Despite substantial differences in experimental and analytical pipelines, the combined datasets revealed robust chemogenomic response signatures, characterized by gene signatures, enrichment for biological processes and mechanisms of drug action. We previously reported that the cellular response to small molecules is limited and can be described by a network of 45 chemogenomic signatures. In the present study, we show that the majority of these signatures (66%) are also found in the companion dataset, providing further support for their biological relevance as conserved systems-level, small molecule response systems. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the robustness of chemogenomic fitness profiling in yeast, while offering guidelines for performing other high-dimensional comparisons including parallel CRISPR screens in mammalian cells. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08395-x. BioMed Central 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8915488/ /pubmed/35277135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08395-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Barazandeh, Marjan Kriti, Divya Nislow, Corey Giaever, Guri The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
title | The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
title_full | The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
title_fullStr | The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
title_full_unstemmed | The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
title_short | The cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
title_sort | cellular response to drug perturbation is limited: comparison of large-scale chemogenomic fitness signatures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08395-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barazandehmarjan thecellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT kritidivya thecellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT nislowcorey thecellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT giaeverguri thecellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT barazandehmarjan cellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT kritidivya cellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT nislowcorey cellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures AT giaeverguri cellularresponsetodrugperturbationislimitedcomparisonoflargescalechemogenomicfitnesssignatures |