Cargando…

Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple

Carotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coelho, Tiago Linus Silva, Silva, Darlisson Slag Neri, dos Santos Junior, Jedaias Marreiros, Dantas, Clecio, Nogueira, Ana Rita de Araujo, Lopes Júnior, Cícero Alves, Vieira, Edivan Carvalho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980
_version_ 1784669333326135296
author Coelho, Tiago Linus Silva
Silva, Darlisson Slag Neri
dos Santos Junior, Jedaias Marreiros
Dantas, Clecio
Nogueira, Ana Rita de Araujo
Lopes Júnior, Cícero Alves
Vieira, Edivan Carvalho
author_facet Coelho, Tiago Linus Silva
Silva, Darlisson Slag Neri
dos Santos Junior, Jedaias Marreiros
Dantas, Clecio
Nogueira, Ana Rita de Araujo
Lopes Júnior, Cícero Alves
Vieira, Edivan Carvalho
author_sort Coelho, Tiago Linus Silva
collection PubMed
description Carotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59–201 mg) and extraction time (6–34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89214892022-03-16 Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple Coelho, Tiago Linus Silva Silva, Darlisson Slag Neri dos Santos Junior, Jedaias Marreiros Dantas, Clecio Nogueira, Ana Rita de Araujo Lopes Júnior, Cícero Alves Vieira, Edivan Carvalho Ultrason Sonochem Short Communication Carotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59–201 mg) and extraction time (6–34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix. Elsevier 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8921489/ /pubmed/35288329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Coelho, Tiago Linus Silva
Silva, Darlisson Slag Neri
dos Santos Junior, Jedaias Marreiros
Dantas, Clecio
Nogueira, Ana Rita de Araujo
Lopes Júnior, Cícero Alves
Vieira, Edivan Carvalho
Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
title Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
title_full Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
title_fullStr Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
title_short Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
title_sort multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (ce) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (uae) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980
work_keys_str_mv AT coelhotiagolinussilva multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple
AT silvadarlissonslagneri multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple
AT dossantosjuniorjedaiasmarreiros multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple
AT dantasclecio multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple
AT nogueiraanaritadearaujo multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple
AT lopesjuniorciceroalves multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple
AT vieiraedivancarvalho multivariateoptimizationandcomparisonbetweenconventionalextractionceandultrasonicassistedextractionuaeofcarotenoidextractionfromcashewapple