Cargando…

No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 12 weeks load-matched block periodization (BP, n = 14), using weekly concentration of high- (HIT), moderate- (MIT), and low- (LIT) intensity training, with traditional periodization (TP, n = 16) using a weekly, cyclic progressive increase in tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almquist, Nicki Winfield, Eriksen, Hanne Berg, Wilhelmsen, Malene, Hamarsland, Håvard, Ing, Steven, Ellefsen, Stian, Sandbakk, Øyvind, Rønnestad, Bent R., Skovereng, Knut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35299664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.837634
_version_ 1784669366576480256
author Almquist, Nicki Winfield
Eriksen, Hanne Berg
Wilhelmsen, Malene
Hamarsland, Håvard
Ing, Steven
Ellefsen, Stian
Sandbakk, Øyvind
Rønnestad, Bent R.
Skovereng, Knut
author_facet Almquist, Nicki Winfield
Eriksen, Hanne Berg
Wilhelmsen, Malene
Hamarsland, Håvard
Ing, Steven
Ellefsen, Stian
Sandbakk, Øyvind
Rønnestad, Bent R.
Skovereng, Knut
author_sort Almquist, Nicki Winfield
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 12 weeks load-matched block periodization (BP, n = 14), using weekly concentration of high- (HIT), moderate- (MIT), and low- (LIT) intensity training, with traditional periodization (TP, n = 16) using a weekly, cyclic progressive increase in training load of HIT-, MIT-, and LIT-sessions in trained cyclists (peak oxygen uptake: 58 ± 8 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)). Red blood cell volume increased 10 ± 16% (p = 0.029) more in BP compared to TP, while capillaries around type I fibers increased 20 ± 12% (p = 0.002) more in TP compared to BP from Pre to Post12. No other group differences were found in time-trial (TT) performances or muscular-, or hematological adaptations. However, both groups improved 5 and 40-min TT power by 9 ± 9% (p < 0.001) and 8 ± 9% (p < 0.001), maximal aerobic power (W(max)) and power output (PO) at 4 mmol·L(−1) blood lactate (W(4mmol)), by 6 ± 7 (p = 0.001) and 10 ± 12% (p = 0.001), and gross efficiency (GE) in a semi-fatigued state by 0.5 ± 1.1%-points (p = 0.026). In contrast, GE in fresh state and VO(2peak) were unaltered in both groups. The muscle protein content of β-hydroxyacyl (HAD) increased by 55 ± 58% in TP only, while both TP and BP increased the content of cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV (COXIV) by 72 ± 34%. Muscle enzyme activities of citrate synthase (CS) and phosphofructokinase (PFK) were unaltered. TP increased capillary-to-fiber ratio and capillary around fiber (CAF) type I by 36 ± 15% (p < 0.001) and 17 ± 8% (p = 0.025), respectively, while BP increased capillary density (CD) by 28 ± 24% (p = 0.048) from Pre to Post12. The present study shows no difference in performance between BP and “best practice”-TP of endurance training intensities using a cyclic, progressively increasing training load in trained cyclists. However, hematological and muscle capillary adaptations may differ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89216592022-03-16 No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists Almquist, Nicki Winfield Eriksen, Hanne Berg Wilhelmsen, Malene Hamarsland, Håvard Ing, Steven Ellefsen, Stian Sandbakk, Øyvind Rønnestad, Bent R. Skovereng, Knut Front Physiol Physiology The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 12 weeks load-matched block periodization (BP, n = 14), using weekly concentration of high- (HIT), moderate- (MIT), and low- (LIT) intensity training, with traditional periodization (TP, n = 16) using a weekly, cyclic progressive increase in training load of HIT-, MIT-, and LIT-sessions in trained cyclists (peak oxygen uptake: 58 ± 8 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)). Red blood cell volume increased 10 ± 16% (p = 0.029) more in BP compared to TP, while capillaries around type I fibers increased 20 ± 12% (p = 0.002) more in TP compared to BP from Pre to Post12. No other group differences were found in time-trial (TT) performances or muscular-, or hematological adaptations. However, both groups improved 5 and 40-min TT power by 9 ± 9% (p < 0.001) and 8 ± 9% (p < 0.001), maximal aerobic power (W(max)) and power output (PO) at 4 mmol·L(−1) blood lactate (W(4mmol)), by 6 ± 7 (p = 0.001) and 10 ± 12% (p = 0.001), and gross efficiency (GE) in a semi-fatigued state by 0.5 ± 1.1%-points (p = 0.026). In contrast, GE in fresh state and VO(2peak) were unaltered in both groups. The muscle protein content of β-hydroxyacyl (HAD) increased by 55 ± 58% in TP only, while both TP and BP increased the content of cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV (COXIV) by 72 ± 34%. Muscle enzyme activities of citrate synthase (CS) and phosphofructokinase (PFK) were unaltered. TP increased capillary-to-fiber ratio and capillary around fiber (CAF) type I by 36 ± 15% (p < 0.001) and 17 ± 8% (p = 0.025), respectively, while BP increased capillary density (CD) by 28 ± 24% (p = 0.048) from Pre to Post12. The present study shows no difference in performance between BP and “best practice”-TP of endurance training intensities using a cyclic, progressively increasing training load in trained cyclists. However, hematological and muscle capillary adaptations may differ. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8921659/ /pubmed/35299664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.837634 Text en Copyright © 2022 Almquist, Eriksen, Wilhelmsen, Hamarsland, Ing, Ellefsen, Sandbakk, Rønnestad and Skovereng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Almquist, Nicki Winfield
Eriksen, Hanne Berg
Wilhelmsen, Malene
Hamarsland, Håvard
Ing, Steven
Ellefsen, Stian
Sandbakk, Øyvind
Rønnestad, Bent R.
Skovereng, Knut
No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists
title No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists
title_full No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists
title_fullStr No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists
title_full_unstemmed No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists
title_short No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists
title_sort no differences between 12 weeks of block- vs. traditional-periodized training in performance adaptations in trained cyclists
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35299664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.837634
work_keys_str_mv AT almquistnickiwinfield nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT eriksenhanneberg nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT wilhelmsenmalene nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT hamarslandhavard nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT ingsteven nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT ellefsenstian nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT sandbakkøyvind nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT rønnestadbentr nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists
AT skoverengknut nodifferencesbetween12weeksofblockvstraditionalperiodizedtraininginperformanceadaptationsintrainedcyclists