Cargando…

Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations

A central question in drug discovery is how to select drug candidates from a large number of available compounds. This analysis presents a model-based approach for comparing and ranking combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers. The approach is quantitative and based on the previously-derived T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardilin, Tim, Almquist, Joachim, Jirstrand, Mats, Zimmermann, Astrid, Lignet, Floriane, El Bawab, Samer, Gabrielsson, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34623558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7
_version_ 1784672974527266816
author Cardilin, Tim
Almquist, Joachim
Jirstrand, Mats
Zimmermann, Astrid
Lignet, Floriane
El Bawab, Samer
Gabrielsson, Johan
author_facet Cardilin, Tim
Almquist, Joachim
Jirstrand, Mats
Zimmermann, Astrid
Lignet, Floriane
El Bawab, Samer
Gabrielsson, Johan
author_sort Cardilin, Tim
collection PubMed
description A central question in drug discovery is how to select drug candidates from a large number of available compounds. This analysis presents a model-based approach for comparing and ranking combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers. The approach is quantitative and based on the previously-derived Tumor Static Exposure (TSE) concept. Combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers are evaluated based on their ability to induce tumor regression relative to toxicity and other potential costs. The approach is presented in the form of a case study where the objective is to find the most promising candidate out of three radiosensitizing agents. Data from a xenograft study is described using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach and a previously-published tumor model for radiation and radiosensitizing agents. First, the most promising candidate is chosen under the assumption that all compounds are equally toxic. The impact of toxicity in compound selection is then illustrated by assuming that one compound is more toxic than the others, leading to a different choice of candidate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8940791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89407912022-04-07 Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations Cardilin, Tim Almquist, Joachim Jirstrand, Mats Zimmermann, Astrid Lignet, Floriane El Bawab, Samer Gabrielsson, Johan J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Original Paper A central question in drug discovery is how to select drug candidates from a large number of available compounds. This analysis presents a model-based approach for comparing and ranking combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers. The approach is quantitative and based on the previously-derived Tumor Static Exposure (TSE) concept. Combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers are evaluated based on their ability to induce tumor regression relative to toxicity and other potential costs. The approach is presented in the form of a case study where the objective is to find the most promising candidate out of three radiosensitizing agents. Data from a xenograft study is described using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach and a previously-published tumor model for radiation and radiosensitizing agents. First, the most promising candidate is chosen under the assumption that all compounds are equally toxic. The impact of toxicity in compound selection is then illustrated by assuming that one compound is more toxic than the others, leading to a different choice of candidate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7. Springer US 2021-10-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8940791/ /pubmed/34623558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cardilin, Tim
Almquist, Joachim
Jirstrand, Mats
Zimmermann, Astrid
Lignet, Floriane
El Bawab, Samer
Gabrielsson, Johan
Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
title Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
title_full Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
title_fullStr Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
title_full_unstemmed Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
title_short Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
title_sort exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34623558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cardilintim exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations
AT almquistjoachim exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations
AT jirstrandmats exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations
AT zimmermannastrid exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations
AT lignetfloriane exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations
AT elbawabsamer exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations
AT gabrielssonjohan exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations