Cargando…
Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations
A central question in drug discovery is how to select drug candidates from a large number of available compounds. This analysis presents a model-based approach for comparing and ranking combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers. The approach is quantitative and based on the previously-derived T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34623558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7 |
_version_ | 1784672974527266816 |
---|---|
author | Cardilin, Tim Almquist, Joachim Jirstrand, Mats Zimmermann, Astrid Lignet, Floriane El Bawab, Samer Gabrielsson, Johan |
author_facet | Cardilin, Tim Almquist, Joachim Jirstrand, Mats Zimmermann, Astrid Lignet, Floriane El Bawab, Samer Gabrielsson, Johan |
author_sort | Cardilin, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | A central question in drug discovery is how to select drug candidates from a large number of available compounds. This analysis presents a model-based approach for comparing and ranking combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers. The approach is quantitative and based on the previously-derived Tumor Static Exposure (TSE) concept. Combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers are evaluated based on their ability to induce tumor regression relative to toxicity and other potential costs. The approach is presented in the form of a case study where the objective is to find the most promising candidate out of three radiosensitizing agents. Data from a xenograft study is described using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach and a previously-published tumor model for radiation and radiosensitizing agents. First, the most promising candidate is chosen under the assumption that all compounds are equally toxic. The impact of toxicity in compound selection is then illustrated by assuming that one compound is more toxic than the others, leading to a different choice of candidate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8940791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89407912022-04-07 Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations Cardilin, Tim Almquist, Joachim Jirstrand, Mats Zimmermann, Astrid Lignet, Floriane El Bawab, Samer Gabrielsson, Johan J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Original Paper A central question in drug discovery is how to select drug candidates from a large number of available compounds. This analysis presents a model-based approach for comparing and ranking combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers. The approach is quantitative and based on the previously-derived Tumor Static Exposure (TSE) concept. Combinations of radiation and radiosensitizers are evaluated based on their ability to induce tumor regression relative to toxicity and other potential costs. The approach is presented in the form of a case study where the objective is to find the most promising candidate out of three radiosensitizing agents. Data from a xenograft study is described using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach and a previously-published tumor model for radiation and radiosensitizing agents. First, the most promising candidate is chosen under the assumption that all compounds are equally toxic. The impact of toxicity in compound selection is then illustrated by assuming that one compound is more toxic than the others, leading to a different choice of candidate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7. Springer US 2021-10-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8940791/ /pubmed/34623558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cardilin, Tim Almquist, Joachim Jirstrand, Mats Zimmermann, Astrid Lignet, Floriane El Bawab, Samer Gabrielsson, Johan Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
title | Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
title_full | Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
title_fullStr | Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
title_full_unstemmed | Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
title_short | Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
title_sort | exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34623558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09784-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardilintim exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations AT almquistjoachim exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations AT jirstrandmats exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations AT zimmermannastrid exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations AT lignetfloriane exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations AT elbawabsamer exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations AT gabrielssonjohan exposureresponsemodelingimprovesselectionofradiationandradiosensitizercombinations |