Cargando…

The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin

The most widely used formalin test to screen antinociceptive drug candidates is still apostrophized as targeting inflammatory pain, in spite of strong opposing evidence published. In our rat skin‐nerve preparation ex vivo, recording from all classes of sensory single‐fibers (n = 32), 30 units were t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Tal, Klemm, Florian, I Kichko, Tatjana, Sauer, Susanne K, Kistner, Katrin, Riedl, Bernhard, Raboisson, Patrick, Luo, Lei, Babes, Alexandru, Kocher, Laurence, Carli, Giancarlo, Fischer, Michael J. M., Reeh, Peter W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340127
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15194
_version_ 1784676781605781504
author Hoffmann, Tal
Klemm, Florian
I Kichko, Tatjana
Sauer, Susanne K
Kistner, Katrin
Riedl, Bernhard
Raboisson, Patrick
Luo, Lei
Babes, Alexandru
Kocher, Laurence
Carli, Giancarlo
Fischer, Michael J. M.
Reeh, Peter W.
author_facet Hoffmann, Tal
Klemm, Florian
I Kichko, Tatjana
Sauer, Susanne K
Kistner, Katrin
Riedl, Bernhard
Raboisson, Patrick
Luo, Lei
Babes, Alexandru
Kocher, Laurence
Carli, Giancarlo
Fischer, Michael J. M.
Reeh, Peter W.
author_sort Hoffmann, Tal
collection PubMed
description The most widely used formalin test to screen antinociceptive drug candidates is still apostrophized as targeting inflammatory pain, in spite of strong opposing evidence published. In our rat skin‐nerve preparation ex vivo, recording from all classes of sensory single‐fibers (n = 32), 30 units were transiently excited by formaldehyde concentrations 1–100 mM applied to receptive fields (RFs) for 3 min, C and Aδ‐fibers being more sensitive (1–30 mM) than Aβ−fibers. From 30 mM on, ~1% of the concentration usually injected in vivo, all RFs were defunctionalized and conduction in an isolated sciatic nerve preparation was irreversibly blocked. Thus, formaldehyde, generated a state of ‘anesthesia dolorosa’ in the RFs in so far as after a quiescent interphase all fibers with unmyelinated terminals developed a second phase of vigorous discharge activity which correlated well in time course and magnitude with published pain‐related behaviors. Sural nerve filament recordings in vivo confirmed that higher formalin concentrations (> 42 mM) have to be injected to the skin to induce this second phase of discharge. Patch‐clamp and calcium‐imaging confirmed TRPA1 as the primary transducer of formaldehyde (10 mM) effects on mouse sensory neurons. However, stimulated CGRP release from isolated skin of TRPA1(+/+) and TRPA1(–/–) mice showed a convergence of the saturating concentration‐response curves at 100 mM formaldehyde, which did not occur with nerve and trachea preparations. Finally, skin‐nerve recordings from C and Aδ‐fibers of TRPA1(–/–) mice revealed a massive reduction in formaldehyde (30 mM)‐evoked discharge. However, the remaining activity was still biphasic, thus confirming additional unspecific excitotoxic actions of the fixative that diffuses along still excitable axons as previously published. The multiplicity of formaldehyde's actions requires extensive discussion and literature review, leading to a fundamental reevaluation of the formalin test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8957662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89576622022-03-29 The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin Hoffmann, Tal Klemm, Florian I Kichko, Tatjana Sauer, Susanne K Kistner, Katrin Riedl, Bernhard Raboisson, Patrick Luo, Lei Babes, Alexandru Kocher, Laurence Carli, Giancarlo Fischer, Michael J. M. Reeh, Peter W. Physiol Rep Original Articles The most widely used formalin test to screen antinociceptive drug candidates is still apostrophized as targeting inflammatory pain, in spite of strong opposing evidence published. In our rat skin‐nerve preparation ex vivo, recording from all classes of sensory single‐fibers (n = 32), 30 units were transiently excited by formaldehyde concentrations 1–100 mM applied to receptive fields (RFs) for 3 min, C and Aδ‐fibers being more sensitive (1–30 mM) than Aβ−fibers. From 30 mM on, ~1% of the concentration usually injected in vivo, all RFs were defunctionalized and conduction in an isolated sciatic nerve preparation was irreversibly blocked. Thus, formaldehyde, generated a state of ‘anesthesia dolorosa’ in the RFs in so far as after a quiescent interphase all fibers with unmyelinated terminals developed a second phase of vigorous discharge activity which correlated well in time course and magnitude with published pain‐related behaviors. Sural nerve filament recordings in vivo confirmed that higher formalin concentrations (> 42 mM) have to be injected to the skin to induce this second phase of discharge. Patch‐clamp and calcium‐imaging confirmed TRPA1 as the primary transducer of formaldehyde (10 mM) effects on mouse sensory neurons. However, stimulated CGRP release from isolated skin of TRPA1(+/+) and TRPA1(–/–) mice showed a convergence of the saturating concentration‐response curves at 100 mM formaldehyde, which did not occur with nerve and trachea preparations. Finally, skin‐nerve recordings from C and Aδ‐fibers of TRPA1(–/–) mice revealed a massive reduction in formaldehyde (30 mM)‐evoked discharge. However, the remaining activity was still biphasic, thus confirming additional unspecific excitotoxic actions of the fixative that diffuses along still excitable axons as previously published. The multiplicity of formaldehyde's actions requires extensive discussion and literature review, leading to a fundamental reevaluation of the formalin test. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8957662/ /pubmed/35340127 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15194 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hoffmann, Tal
Klemm, Florian
I Kichko, Tatjana
Sauer, Susanne K
Kistner, Katrin
Riedl, Bernhard
Raboisson, Patrick
Luo, Lei
Babes, Alexandru
Kocher, Laurence
Carli, Giancarlo
Fischer, Michael J. M.
Reeh, Peter W.
The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
title The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
title_full The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
title_fullStr The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
title_full_unstemmed The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
title_short The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
title_sort formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340127
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15194
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmanntal theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT klemmflorian theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT ikichkotatjana theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT sauersusannek theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT kistnerkatrin theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT riedlbernhard theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT raboissonpatrick theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT luolei theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT babesalexandru theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT kocherlaurence theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT carligiancarlo theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT fischermichaeljm theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT reehpeterw theformalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT hoffmanntal formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT klemmflorian formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT ikichkotatjana formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT sauersusannek formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT kistnerkatrin formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT riedlbernhard formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT raboissonpatrick formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT luolei formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT babesalexandru formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT kocherlaurence formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT carligiancarlo formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT fischermichaeljm formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin
AT reehpeterw formalintestdoesnotprobeinflammatorypainbutexcitotoxicityinrodentskin