Cargando…
The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course
Understanding factors that promote student engagement with online learning environments is important for benchmarking and improving the quality of teaching in a digital era. This study aimed to describe the online interactive content created for delivery of an undergraduate nutrition course and to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.811103 |
_version_ | 1784678338143453184 |
---|---|
author | Livingstone, Katherine M. Milte, Catherine M. Macfarlane, Susie Woods, Julie Booth, Alison |
author_facet | Livingstone, Katherine M. Milte, Catherine M. Macfarlane, Susie Woods, Julie Booth, Alison |
author_sort | Livingstone, Katherine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding factors that promote student engagement with online learning environments is important for benchmarking and improving the quality of teaching in a digital era. This study aimed to describe the online interactive content created for delivery of an undergraduate nutrition course and to evaluate student engagement with the online interactive content. We collected online questionnaire data in 2018 and 2019 from two cohorts of students enrolled in a Deakin University undergraduate nutrition unit. Two-sample unpaired t-tests were used to examine differences in participant engagement with online topic guides between static text-based and interactive content. A total of 89 participants (19–56 years) were included. Sixty four of students reported always/usually reading static text-based topic guides most weeks and 64% perceived them as moderately/highly effective. While 60% of participants reported reading the online interactive topic guides most weeks and 93% perceived them as moderate/highly effective. Most participants indicated the interactive topic guides were more effective than static text-based topic guides they experienced in other courses (76%). Hours dedicated to the online interactive topic guide were higher (6.4 SD 2.9 vs. 1.7 SD 1.7 h; P < 0.001) as was the rating of how engaging the topic guides were (7.2 SD 1.6 vs. 6.7 SD 2.5; P = 0.008). These findings suggest that interactive content is more engaging. However, this content may not be accessible to all students, and so familiarization and training prior to engaging in an interactive online unit may be needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8965005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89650052022-03-31 The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course Livingstone, Katherine M. Milte, Catherine M. Macfarlane, Susie Woods, Julie Booth, Alison Front Nutr Nutrition Understanding factors that promote student engagement with online learning environments is important for benchmarking and improving the quality of teaching in a digital era. This study aimed to describe the online interactive content created for delivery of an undergraduate nutrition course and to evaluate student engagement with the online interactive content. We collected online questionnaire data in 2018 and 2019 from two cohorts of students enrolled in a Deakin University undergraduate nutrition unit. Two-sample unpaired t-tests were used to examine differences in participant engagement with online topic guides between static text-based and interactive content. A total of 89 participants (19–56 years) were included. Sixty four of students reported always/usually reading static text-based topic guides most weeks and 64% perceived them as moderately/highly effective. While 60% of participants reported reading the online interactive topic guides most weeks and 93% perceived them as moderate/highly effective. Most participants indicated the interactive topic guides were more effective than static text-based topic guides they experienced in other courses (76%). Hours dedicated to the online interactive topic guide were higher (6.4 SD 2.9 vs. 1.7 SD 1.7 h; P < 0.001) as was the rating of how engaging the topic guides were (7.2 SD 1.6 vs. 6.7 SD 2.5; P = 0.008). These findings suggest that interactive content is more engaging. However, this content may not be accessible to all students, and so familiarization and training prior to engaging in an interactive online unit may be needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8965005/ /pubmed/35369053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.811103 Text en Copyright © 2022 Livingstone, Milte, Macfarlane, Woods and Booth. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Livingstone, Katherine M. Milte, Catherine M. Macfarlane, Susie Woods, Julie Booth, Alison The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course |
title | The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course |
title_full | The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course |
title_fullStr | The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course |
title_full_unstemmed | The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course |
title_short | The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course |
title_sort | design and evaluation of online interactive learning in an undergraduate nutrition course |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.811103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT livingstonekatherinem thedesignandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT miltecatherinem thedesignandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT macfarlanesusie thedesignandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT woodsjulie thedesignandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT boothalison thedesignandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT livingstonekatherinem designandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT miltecatherinem designandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT macfarlanesusie designandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT woodsjulie designandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse AT boothalison designandevaluationofonlineinteractivelearninginanundergraduatenutritioncourse |