Cargando…
Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subj...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368339 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864 |
_version_ | 1784680044545703936 |
---|---|
author | Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge Nava-Muñoz, Sergio Lara-Alvarez, Carlos |
author_facet | Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge Nava-Muñoz, Sergio Lara-Alvarez, Carlos |
author_sort | Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subject variability of pupil responses. Eye-tracking data used in this study was collected while students solved different memorization tasks divided as low-, medium-, and high-level. Statistical analysis shows that values of pupillometric features (as peak dilation, pupil diameter change, and suchlike) differ significantly for different difficulty levels. We used a wrapper method to select the pupillometric features that work the best for the most common classifiers; Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF). Despite the statistical difference, experiments showed that a random forest classifier trained with five features obtained the best F1-score (82%). This result is essential because it describes a method to evaluate the cognitive load of a subject performing a task using only pupil size features. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8973468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89734682022-04-02 Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge Nava-Muñoz, Sergio Lara-Alvarez, Carlos PeerJ Neuroscience Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subject variability of pupil responses. Eye-tracking data used in this study was collected while students solved different memorization tasks divided as low-, medium-, and high-level. Statistical analysis shows that values of pupillometric features (as peak dilation, pupil diameter change, and suchlike) differ significantly for different difficulty levels. We used a wrapper method to select the pupillometric features that work the best for the most common classifiers; Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF). Despite the statistical difference, experiments showed that a random forest classifier trained with five features obtained the best F1-score (82%). This result is essential because it describes a method to evaluate the cognitive load of a subject performing a task using only pupil size features. PeerJ Inc. 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8973468/ /pubmed/35368339 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864 Text en ©2022 Mitre-Hernandez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge Nava-Muñoz, Sergio Lara-Alvarez, Carlos Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
title | Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
title_full | Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
title_fullStr | Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
title_full_unstemmed | Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
title_short | Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
title_sort | classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368339 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitrehernandezhugo classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse AT sanchezrodriguezjorge classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse AT navamunozsergio classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse AT laraalvarezcarlos classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse |