Cargando…

Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response

Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo, Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge, Nava-Muñoz, Sergio, Lara-Alvarez, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368339
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864
_version_ 1784680044545703936
author Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge
Nava-Muñoz, Sergio
Lara-Alvarez, Carlos
author_facet Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge
Nava-Muñoz, Sergio
Lara-Alvarez, Carlos
author_sort Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo
collection PubMed
description Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subject variability of pupil responses. Eye-tracking data used in this study was collected while students solved different memorization tasks divided as low-, medium-, and high-level. Statistical analysis shows that values of pupillometric features (as peak dilation, pupil diameter change, and suchlike) differ significantly for different difficulty levels. We used a wrapper method to select the pupillometric features that work the best for the most common classifiers; Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF). Despite the statistical difference, experiments showed that a random forest classifier trained with five features obtained the best F1-score (82%). This result is essential because it describes a method to evaluate the cognitive load of a subject performing a task using only pupil size features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8973468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89734682022-04-02 Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge Nava-Muñoz, Sergio Lara-Alvarez, Carlos PeerJ Neuroscience Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subject variability of pupil responses. Eye-tracking data used in this study was collected while students solved different memorization tasks divided as low-, medium-, and high-level. Statistical analysis shows that values of pupillometric features (as peak dilation, pupil diameter change, and suchlike) differ significantly for different difficulty levels. We used a wrapper method to select the pupillometric features that work the best for the most common classifiers; Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF). Despite the statistical difference, experiments showed that a random forest classifier trained with five features obtained the best F1-score (82%). This result is essential because it describes a method to evaluate the cognitive load of a subject performing a task using only pupil size features. PeerJ Inc. 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8973468/ /pubmed/35368339 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864 Text en ©2022 Mitre-Hernandez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Mitre-Hernandez, Hugo
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Jorge
Nava-Muñoz, Sergio
Lara-Alvarez, Carlos
Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
title Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
title_full Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
title_fullStr Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
title_full_unstemmed Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
title_short Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
title_sort classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368339
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864
work_keys_str_mv AT mitrehernandezhugo classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse
AT sanchezrodriguezjorge classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse
AT navamunozsergio classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse
AT laraalvarezcarlos classifyingthedifficultylevelsofworkingmemorytasksbyusingpupillaryresponse