Cargando…
Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification
BACKGROUND: cfMeDIP-seq is a low-cost method for determining the DNA methylation status of cell-free DNA and it has been successfully combined with statistical methods for accurate cancer diagnostics. We investigate the diagnostic classification aspect by applying statistical tests and dimension red...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04651-9 |
_version_ | 1784680959112642560 |
---|---|
author | Halla-aho, Viivi Lähdesmäki, Harri |
author_facet | Halla-aho, Viivi Lähdesmäki, Harri |
author_sort | Halla-aho, Viivi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: cfMeDIP-seq is a low-cost method for determining the DNA methylation status of cell-free DNA and it has been successfully combined with statistical methods for accurate cancer diagnostics. We investigate the diagnostic classification aspect by applying statistical tests and dimension reduction techniques for feature selection and probabilistic modeling for the cancer type classification, and we also study the effect of sequencing depth. METHODS: We experiment with a variety of statistical methods that use different feature selection and feature extraction methods as well as probabilistic classifiers for diagnostic decision making. We test the (moderated) t-tests and the Fisher’s exact test for feature selection, principal component analysis (PCA) as well as iterative supervised PCA (ISPCA) for feature generation, and GLMnet and logistic regression methods with sparsity promoting priors for classification. Probabilistic programming language Stan is used to implement Bayesian inference for the probabilistic models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We compare overlaps of differentially methylated genomic regions as chosen by different feature selection methods, and evaluate probabilistic classifiers by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic scores on discovery and validation cohorts. While we observe that many methods perform equally well as, and occasionally considerably better than, GLMnet that was originally proposed for cfMeDIP-seq based cancer classification, we also observed that performance of different methods vary across sequencing depths, cancer types and study cohorts. Overall, methods that seem robust and promising include Fisher’s exact test and ISPCA for feature selection as well as a simple logistic regression model with the number of hyper and hypo-methylated regions as features. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-022-04651-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8978416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89784162022-04-05 Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification Halla-aho, Viivi Lähdesmäki, Harri BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: cfMeDIP-seq is a low-cost method for determining the DNA methylation status of cell-free DNA and it has been successfully combined with statistical methods for accurate cancer diagnostics. We investigate the diagnostic classification aspect by applying statistical tests and dimension reduction techniques for feature selection and probabilistic modeling for the cancer type classification, and we also study the effect of sequencing depth. METHODS: We experiment with a variety of statistical methods that use different feature selection and feature extraction methods as well as probabilistic classifiers for diagnostic decision making. We test the (moderated) t-tests and the Fisher’s exact test for feature selection, principal component analysis (PCA) as well as iterative supervised PCA (ISPCA) for feature generation, and GLMnet and logistic regression methods with sparsity promoting priors for classification. Probabilistic programming language Stan is used to implement Bayesian inference for the probabilistic models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We compare overlaps of differentially methylated genomic regions as chosen by different feature selection methods, and evaluate probabilistic classifiers by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic scores on discovery and validation cohorts. While we observe that many methods perform equally well as, and occasionally considerably better than, GLMnet that was originally proposed for cfMeDIP-seq based cancer classification, we also observed that performance of different methods vary across sequencing depths, cancer types and study cohorts. Overall, methods that seem robust and promising include Fisher’s exact test and ISPCA for feature selection as well as a simple logistic regression model with the number of hyper and hypo-methylated regions as features. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-022-04651-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8978416/ /pubmed/35379172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04651-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Halla-aho, Viivi Lähdesmäki, Harri Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification |
title | Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification |
title_full | Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification |
title_fullStr | Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification |
title_short | Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification |
title_sort | probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free dna methylation based cancer classification |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04651-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallaahoviivi probabilisticmodelingmethodsforcellfreednamethylationbasedcancerclassification AT lahdesmakiharri probabilisticmodelingmethodsforcellfreednamethylationbasedcancerclassification |