Cargando…

Effect of ethylenediamine on CMP performance of ruthenium in H(2)O(2)-based slurries

With the aggressive scaling of integrated circuits, ruthenium has been proposed as the next generation barrier material to replace the conventional bilayer of tantalum and tantalum nitride due to its properties such as allowing direct copper electrodeposition. In this work, the effect of ethylenedia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yi, Ma, Tengda, Liu, Yuling, Tan, Baimei, Zhang, Shihao, Wang, Yazhen, Song, Guoqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra08243d
Descripción
Sumario:With the aggressive scaling of integrated circuits, ruthenium has been proposed as the next generation barrier material to replace the conventional bilayer of tantalum and tantalum nitride due to its properties such as allowing direct copper electrodeposition. In this work, the effect of ethylenediamine (EDA) on the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) properties of ruthenium in H(2)O(2)-based slurries was investigated. The results show that EDA or H(2)O(2) alone has little effect, but the combined use of EDA and H(2)O(2) significantly enhances the removal rate of ruthenium. Subsequently, the mechanism of action of ruthenium removal promoted by EDA was studied by combining CMP experiments, electrochemical experiments and surface chemical characterization methods. It is indicated that EDA molecules react with ruthenium oxide (not ruthenium metal) to generate a large number of complexes, which promotes the dissolution of ruthenium oxides and the corrosion of ruthenium. More importantly, the oxide layers on the ruthenium surface become rough and porous, and can be easily removed by mechanical action during the ruthenium CMP process. Meanwhile, the use of EDA can reduce the electrostatic repulsive force between the SiO(2) particles and ruthenium surface in the CMP process, thus further accelerating the ruthenium removal. In order to obtain an adequate removal rate selectivity of ruthenium versus copper, the corrosion inhibitors for copper were added. As a consequence, the removal rate selectivity of 1.13 : 1 was obtained, while also reducing the corrosion potential difference between ruthenium and copper to 17 mV.