Cargando…

Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota

OVERVIEW: Processed foods make up about 70 percent of the North American diet. Sulfites and other food preservatives are added to these foods largely to limit bacterial contamination. The mouth microbiota and its associated enzymes are the first to encounter food and therefore likely to be the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irwin, Sally V., Deardorff, Luz Maria, Deng, Youping, Fisher, Peter, Gould, Michelle, June, Junnie, Kent, Rachael S., Qin, Yujia, Yadao, Fracesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265249
_version_ 1784683154019188736
author Irwin, Sally V.
Deardorff, Luz Maria
Deng, Youping
Fisher, Peter
Gould, Michelle
June, Junnie
Kent, Rachael S.
Qin, Yujia
Yadao, Fracesca
author_facet Irwin, Sally V.
Deardorff, Luz Maria
Deng, Youping
Fisher, Peter
Gould, Michelle
June, Junnie
Kent, Rachael S.
Qin, Yujia
Yadao, Fracesca
author_sort Irwin, Sally V.
collection PubMed
description OVERVIEW: Processed foods make up about 70 percent of the North American diet. Sulfites and other food preservatives are added to these foods largely to limit bacterial contamination. The mouth microbiota and its associated enzymes are the first to encounter food and therefore likely to be the most affected. METHODS: Eight saliva samples from ten individuals were exposed to two sulfite preservatives, sodium sulfite and sodium bisulfite. One sample set was evaluated for bacteria composition utilizing 16s rRNA sequencing, and the number of viable cells in all sample sets was determined utilizing ATP assays at 10 and 40-minute exposure times. All untreated samples were analyzed for baseline lysozyme activity, and possible correlations between the number of viable cells and lysozyme activity. RESULTS: Sequencing indicated significant increases in alpha diversity with sodium bisulfite exposure and changes in relative abundance of 3 amplicon sequence variants (ASV). Sodium sulfite treated samples showed a significant decrease in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, a marginally significant change in alpha diversity, and a significant change in the relative abundance for Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and for 6 ASVs. Beta diversity didn’t show separation between groups, however, all but one sample set was observed to be moving in the same direction under sodium sulfite treatment. ATP assays indicated a significant and consistent average decrease in activity ranging from 24–46% at both exposure times with both sulfites. Average initial rates of lysozyme activity between all individuals ranged from +/- 76% compared to individual variations of +/- 10–34%. No consistent, significant correlation was found between ATP and lysozyme activity in any sample sets. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfite preservatives, at concentrations regarded as safe by the FDA, alter the relative abundance and richness of the microbiota found in saliva, and decrease the number of viable cells, within 10 minutes of exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89893572022-04-08 Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota Irwin, Sally V. Deardorff, Luz Maria Deng, Youping Fisher, Peter Gould, Michelle June, Junnie Kent, Rachael S. Qin, Yujia Yadao, Fracesca PLoS One Research Article OVERVIEW: Processed foods make up about 70 percent of the North American diet. Sulfites and other food preservatives are added to these foods largely to limit bacterial contamination. The mouth microbiota and its associated enzymes are the first to encounter food and therefore likely to be the most affected. METHODS: Eight saliva samples from ten individuals were exposed to two sulfite preservatives, sodium sulfite and sodium bisulfite. One sample set was evaluated for bacteria composition utilizing 16s rRNA sequencing, and the number of viable cells in all sample sets was determined utilizing ATP assays at 10 and 40-minute exposure times. All untreated samples were analyzed for baseline lysozyme activity, and possible correlations between the number of viable cells and lysozyme activity. RESULTS: Sequencing indicated significant increases in alpha diversity with sodium bisulfite exposure and changes in relative abundance of 3 amplicon sequence variants (ASV). Sodium sulfite treated samples showed a significant decrease in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, a marginally significant change in alpha diversity, and a significant change in the relative abundance for Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and for 6 ASVs. Beta diversity didn’t show separation between groups, however, all but one sample set was observed to be moving in the same direction under sodium sulfite treatment. ATP assays indicated a significant and consistent average decrease in activity ranging from 24–46% at both exposure times with both sulfites. Average initial rates of lysozyme activity between all individuals ranged from +/- 76% compared to individual variations of +/- 10–34%. No consistent, significant correlation was found between ATP and lysozyme activity in any sample sets. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfite preservatives, at concentrations regarded as safe by the FDA, alter the relative abundance and richness of the microbiota found in saliva, and decrease the number of viable cells, within 10 minutes of exposure. Public Library of Science 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8989357/ /pubmed/35390016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265249 Text en © 2022 Irwin et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Irwin, Sally V.
Deardorff, Luz Maria
Deng, Youping
Fisher, Peter
Gould, Michelle
June, Junnie
Kent, Rachael S.
Qin, Yujia
Yadao, Fracesca
Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
title Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
title_full Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
title_fullStr Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
title_short Sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: Changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
title_sort sulfite preservatives effects on the mouth microbiome: changes in viability, diversity and composition of microbiota
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265249
work_keys_str_mv AT irwinsallyv sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT deardorffluzmaria sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT dengyouping sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT fisherpeter sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT gouldmichelle sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT junejunnie sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT kentrachaels sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT qinyujia sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota
AT yadaofracesca sulfitepreservativeseffectsonthemouthmicrobiomechangesinviabilitydiversityandcompositionofmicrobiota