Cargando…
Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.829842 |
_version_ | 1784683178900848640 |
---|---|
author | Cossu, Andrea Graffieti, Gabriele Pellegrini, Lorenzo Maltoni, Davide Bacciu, Davide Carta, Antonio Lomonaco, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Cossu, Andrea Graffieti, Gabriele Pellegrini, Lorenzo Maltoni, Davide Bacciu, Davide Carta, Antonio Lomonaco, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Cossu, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly on class-incremental scenarios, where classes present in one experience are never revisited. We posit that an excessive focus on this setting may be limiting for future research on continual learning, since class-incremental scenarios artificially exacerbate catastrophic forgetting, at the expense of other important objectives like forward transfer and computational efficiency. In many real-world environments, in fact, repetition of previously encountered concepts occurs naturally and contributes to softening the disruption of previous knowledge. We advocate for a more in-depth study of alternative continual learning scenarios, in which repetition is integrated by design in the stream of incoming information. Starting from already existing proposals, we describe the advantages such class-incremental with repetition scenarios could offer for a more comprehensive assessment of continual learning models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8989463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89894632022-04-08 Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? Cossu, Andrea Graffieti, Gabriele Pellegrini, Lorenzo Maltoni, Davide Bacciu, Davide Carta, Antonio Lomonaco, Vincenzo Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly on class-incremental scenarios, where classes present in one experience are never revisited. We posit that an excessive focus on this setting may be limiting for future research on continual learning, since class-incremental scenarios artificially exacerbate catastrophic forgetting, at the expense of other important objectives like forward transfer and computational efficiency. In many real-world environments, in fact, repetition of previously encountered concepts occurs naturally and contributes to softening the disruption of previous knowledge. We advocate for a more in-depth study of alternative continual learning scenarios, in which repetition is integrated by design in the stream of incoming information. Starting from already existing proposals, we describe the advantages such class-incremental with repetition scenarios could offer for a more comprehensive assessment of continual learning models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8989463/ /pubmed/35402898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.829842 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cossu, Graffieti, Pellegrini, Maltoni, Bacciu, Carta and Lomonaco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Cossu, Andrea Graffieti, Gabriele Pellegrini, Lorenzo Maltoni, Davide Bacciu, Davide Carta, Antonio Lomonaco, Vincenzo Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? |
title | Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? |
title_full | Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? |
title_fullStr | Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? |
title_short | Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? |
title_sort | is class-incremental enough for continual learning? |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.829842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cossuandrea isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning AT graffietigabriele isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning AT pellegrinilorenzo isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning AT maltonidavide isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning AT bacciudavide isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning AT cartaantonio isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning AT lomonacovincenzo isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning |