Cargando…

Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?

The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cossu, Andrea, Graffieti, Gabriele, Pellegrini, Lorenzo, Maltoni, Davide, Bacciu, Davide, Carta, Antonio, Lomonaco, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.829842
_version_ 1784683178900848640
author Cossu, Andrea
Graffieti, Gabriele
Pellegrini, Lorenzo
Maltoni, Davide
Bacciu, Davide
Carta, Antonio
Lomonaco, Vincenzo
author_facet Cossu, Andrea
Graffieti, Gabriele
Pellegrini, Lorenzo
Maltoni, Davide
Bacciu, Davide
Carta, Antonio
Lomonaco, Vincenzo
author_sort Cossu, Andrea
collection PubMed
description The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly on class-incremental scenarios, where classes present in one experience are never revisited. We posit that an excessive focus on this setting may be limiting for future research on continual learning, since class-incremental scenarios artificially exacerbate catastrophic forgetting, at the expense of other important objectives like forward transfer and computational efficiency. In many real-world environments, in fact, repetition of previously encountered concepts occurs naturally and contributes to softening the disruption of previous knowledge. We advocate for a more in-depth study of alternative continual learning scenarios, in which repetition is integrated by design in the stream of incoming information. Starting from already existing proposals, we describe the advantages such class-incremental with repetition scenarios could offer for a more comprehensive assessment of continual learning models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89894632022-04-08 Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning? Cossu, Andrea Graffieti, Gabriele Pellegrini, Lorenzo Maltoni, Davide Bacciu, Davide Carta, Antonio Lomonaco, Vincenzo Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly on class-incremental scenarios, where classes present in one experience are never revisited. We posit that an excessive focus on this setting may be limiting for future research on continual learning, since class-incremental scenarios artificially exacerbate catastrophic forgetting, at the expense of other important objectives like forward transfer and computational efficiency. In many real-world environments, in fact, repetition of previously encountered concepts occurs naturally and contributes to softening the disruption of previous knowledge. We advocate for a more in-depth study of alternative continual learning scenarios, in which repetition is integrated by design in the stream of incoming information. Starting from already existing proposals, we describe the advantages such class-incremental with repetition scenarios could offer for a more comprehensive assessment of continual learning models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8989463/ /pubmed/35402898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.829842 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cossu, Graffieti, Pellegrini, Maltoni, Bacciu, Carta and Lomonaco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Cossu, Andrea
Graffieti, Gabriele
Pellegrini, Lorenzo
Maltoni, Davide
Bacciu, Davide
Carta, Antonio
Lomonaco, Vincenzo
Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
title Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
title_full Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
title_fullStr Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
title_full_unstemmed Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
title_short Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?
title_sort is class-incremental enough for continual learning?
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.829842
work_keys_str_mv AT cossuandrea isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning
AT graffietigabriele isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning
AT pellegrinilorenzo isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning
AT maltonidavide isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning
AT bacciudavide isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning
AT cartaantonio isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning
AT lomonacovincenzo isclassincrementalenoughforcontinuallearning