Cargando…

Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The current study aimed to assess how sports bettors respond to advertised bets on social media and whether this differs dependent upon bet complexity and social media account type. METHODS: Employing a 3 × 2 repeated measures design, 145 regular football bettors were recruited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houghton, Scott, Moss, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akadémiai Kiadó 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32980826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00056
_version_ 1784684652857917440
author Houghton, Scott
Moss, Mark
author_facet Houghton, Scott
Moss, Mark
author_sort Houghton, Scott
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The current study aimed to assess how sports bettors respond to advertised bets on social media and whether this differs dependent upon bet complexity and social media account type. METHODS: Employing a 3 × 2 repeated measures design, 145 regular football bettors were recruited to take part in an online study requiring them to rate bets advertised upon social media, providing indications of their likelihood to bet, confidence in the bet and how much they would stake on the bet. Advertised bets differed in terms of complexity (low, medium and high) and each bet was presented separately on both an operator account and an affiliate account. RESULTS: Data analysis highlighted a significant interaction between bet complexity and account type, with bettors rating themselves as being more likely to bet and more confident in bets which were presented on an affiliate account for medium complexity bets but not for low or high complexity bets. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence that affiliate marketing of sports betting increases bettor's confidence in certain types of bets. This heightens previously addressed concerns around affiliate marketing, given that affiliates are financially incentivised to attract custom toward gambling operators. Future research should explore risk factors for increased uptake of affiliate marketing, and the impact on gambling behaviour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8997207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89972072022-04-22 Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study Houghton, Scott Moss, Mark J Behav Addict Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The current study aimed to assess how sports bettors respond to advertised bets on social media and whether this differs dependent upon bet complexity and social media account type. METHODS: Employing a 3 × 2 repeated measures design, 145 regular football bettors were recruited to take part in an online study requiring them to rate bets advertised upon social media, providing indications of their likelihood to bet, confidence in the bet and how much they would stake on the bet. Advertised bets differed in terms of complexity (low, medium and high) and each bet was presented separately on both an operator account and an affiliate account. RESULTS: Data analysis highlighted a significant interaction between bet complexity and account type, with bettors rating themselves as being more likely to bet and more confident in bets which were presented on an affiliate account for medium complexity bets but not for low or high complexity bets. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence that affiliate marketing of sports betting increases bettor's confidence in certain types of bets. This heightens previously addressed concerns around affiliate marketing, given that affiliates are financially incentivised to attract custom toward gambling operators. Future research should explore risk factors for increased uptake of affiliate marketing, and the impact on gambling behaviour. Akadémiai Kiadó 2020-09-26 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8997207/ /pubmed/32980826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00056 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated.
spellingShingle Article
Houghton, Scott
Moss, Mark
Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study
title Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study
title_full Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study
title_fullStr Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study
title_short Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – An experimental study
title_sort comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type – an experimental study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32980826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT houghtonscott comparingfootballbettorsresponsetosocialmediamarketingdifferinginbetcomplexityandaccounttypeanexperimentalstudy
AT mossmark comparingfootballbettorsresponsetosocialmediamarketingdifferinginbetcomplexityandaccounttypeanexperimentalstudy