Cargando…

Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy

Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) enhance the delivery of therapeutic enzymes for replacement therapy of lysosomal storage disorders. Previous studies examined NPs encapsulating or coated with enzymes, but these formulations have never been compared. We examined this using hyalur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muntimadugu, Eameema, Silva-Abreu, Marcelle, Vives, Guillem, Loeck, Maximilian, Pham, Vy, del Moral, Maria, Solomon, Melani, Muro, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074034
_version_ 1784685171022233600
author Muntimadugu, Eameema
Silva-Abreu, Marcelle
Vives, Guillem
Loeck, Maximilian
Pham, Vy
del Moral, Maria
Solomon, Melani
Muro, Silvia
author_facet Muntimadugu, Eameema
Silva-Abreu, Marcelle
Vives, Guillem
Loeck, Maximilian
Pham, Vy
del Moral, Maria
Solomon, Melani
Muro, Silvia
author_sort Muntimadugu, Eameema
collection PubMed
description Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) enhance the delivery of therapeutic enzymes for replacement therapy of lysosomal storage disorders. Previous studies examined NPs encapsulating or coated with enzymes, but these formulations have never been compared. We examined this using hyaluronidase (HAse), deficient in mucopolysaccharidosis IX, and acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), deficient in types A–B Niemann–Pick disease. Initial screening of size, PDI, ζ potential, and loading resulted in the selection of the Lactel II co-polymer vs. Lactel I or Resomer, and Pluronic F68 surfactant vs. PVA or DMAB. Enzyme input and addition of carrier protein were evaluated, rendering NPs having, e.g., 181 nm diameter, 0.15 PDI, −36 mV ζ potential, and 538 HAse molecules encapsulated per NP. Similar NPs were coated with enzyme, which reduced loading (e.g., 292 HAse molecules/NP). NPs were coated with targeting antibodies (> 122 molecules/NP), lyophilized for storage without alterations, and acceptably stable at physiological conditions. NPs were internalized, trafficked to lysosomes, released active enzyme at lysosomal conditions, and targeted both peripheral organs and the brain after i.v. administration in mice. While both formulations enhanced enzyme delivery compared to free enzyme, encapsulating NPs surpassed coated counterparts (18.4- vs. 4.3-fold enhancement in cells and 6.2- vs. 3-fold enhancement in brains), providing guidance for future applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8999373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89993732022-04-12 Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy Muntimadugu, Eameema Silva-Abreu, Marcelle Vives, Guillem Loeck, Maximilian Pham, Vy del Moral, Maria Solomon, Melani Muro, Silvia Int J Mol Sci Article Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) enhance the delivery of therapeutic enzymes for replacement therapy of lysosomal storage disorders. Previous studies examined NPs encapsulating or coated with enzymes, but these formulations have never been compared. We examined this using hyaluronidase (HAse), deficient in mucopolysaccharidosis IX, and acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), deficient in types A–B Niemann–Pick disease. Initial screening of size, PDI, ζ potential, and loading resulted in the selection of the Lactel II co-polymer vs. Lactel I or Resomer, and Pluronic F68 surfactant vs. PVA or DMAB. Enzyme input and addition of carrier protein were evaluated, rendering NPs having, e.g., 181 nm diameter, 0.15 PDI, −36 mV ζ potential, and 538 HAse molecules encapsulated per NP. Similar NPs were coated with enzyme, which reduced loading (e.g., 292 HAse molecules/NP). NPs were coated with targeting antibodies (> 122 molecules/NP), lyophilized for storage without alterations, and acceptably stable at physiological conditions. NPs were internalized, trafficked to lysosomes, released active enzyme at lysosomal conditions, and targeted both peripheral organs and the brain after i.v. administration in mice. While both formulations enhanced enzyme delivery compared to free enzyme, encapsulating NPs surpassed coated counterparts (18.4- vs. 4.3-fold enhancement in cells and 6.2- vs. 3-fold enhancement in brains), providing guidance for future applications. MDPI 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8999373/ /pubmed/35409394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Muntimadugu, Eameema
Silva-Abreu, Marcelle
Vives, Guillem
Loeck, Maximilian
Pham, Vy
del Moral, Maria
Solomon, Melani
Muro, Silvia
Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy
title Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy
title_full Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy
title_fullStr Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy
title_short Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy
title_sort comparison between nanoparticle encapsulation and surface loading for lysosomal enzyme replacement therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074034
work_keys_str_mv AT muntimadugueameema comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT silvaabreumarcelle comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT vivesguillem comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT loeckmaximilian comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT phamvy comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT delmoralmaria comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT solomonmelani comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy
AT murosilvia comparisonbetweennanoparticleencapsulationandsurfaceloadingforlysosomalenzymereplacementtherapy