Cargando…

Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies

BACKGROUND: New therapeutic approaches in neurological disorders are progressing into clinical development. Past failures in translational research have underlined the critical importance of selecting appropriate inclusion criteria and primary outcomes. Narrow inclusion criteria provide sensitivity,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cathomen, Adrian, Sirucek, Laura, Killeen, Tim, Abel, Rainer, Maier, Doris, Weidner, Norbert, Rupp, Rüdiger, Hothorn, Torsten, Steeves, John D., Curt, Armin, Bolliger, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683221078302
_version_ 1784686182631735296
author Cathomen, Adrian
Sirucek, Laura
Killeen, Tim
Abel, Rainer
Maier, Doris
Weidner, Norbert
Rupp, Rüdiger
Hothorn, Torsten
Steeves, John D.
Curt, Armin
Bolliger, Marc
author_facet Cathomen, Adrian
Sirucek, Laura
Killeen, Tim
Abel, Rainer
Maier, Doris
Weidner, Norbert
Rupp, Rüdiger
Hothorn, Torsten
Steeves, John D.
Curt, Armin
Bolliger, Marc
author_sort Cathomen, Adrian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New therapeutic approaches in neurological disorders are progressing into clinical development. Past failures in translational research have underlined the critical importance of selecting appropriate inclusion criteria and primary outcomes. Narrow inclusion criteria provide sensitivity, but increase trial duration and cost to the point of infeasibility, while broader requirements amplify confounding, increasing the risk of trial failure. This dilemma is perhaps most pronounced in spinal cord injury (SCI), but applies to all neurological disorders with low frequency and/or heterogeneous clinical manifestations. OBJECTIVE: Stratification of homogeneous patient cohorts to enable the design of clinical trials with broad inclusion criteria. METHODS: Prospectively–gathered data from patients with acute cervical SCI were analysed using an unbiased recursive partitioning conditional inference tree (URP–CTREE) approach. Performance in the 6-minute walk test at 6 months after injury was classified based on standardized neurological assessments within the first 15 days of injury. Functional and neurological outcomes were tracked throughout rehabilitation up to 6 months after injury. RESULTS: URP–CTREE identified homogeneous outcome cohorts in a study group of 309 SCI patients. These cohorts were validated by an internal, yet independent, validation group of 172 patients. The study group cohorts identified demonstrated distinct recovery profiles throughout rehabilitation. The baseline characteristics of the analysed groups were compared to a reference group of 477 patients. CONCLUSION: URP–CTREE enables inclusive trial design by revealing the distribution of outcome cohorts, discerning distinct recovery profiles and projecting potential patient enrolment by providing estimates of the relative frequencies of cohorts to improve the design of clinical trials in SCI and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9003761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90037612022-04-13 Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies Cathomen, Adrian Sirucek, Laura Killeen, Tim Abel, Rainer Maier, Doris Weidner, Norbert Rupp, Rüdiger Hothorn, Torsten Steeves, John D. Curt, Armin Bolliger, Marc Neurorehabil Neural Repair Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: New therapeutic approaches in neurological disorders are progressing into clinical development. Past failures in translational research have underlined the critical importance of selecting appropriate inclusion criteria and primary outcomes. Narrow inclusion criteria provide sensitivity, but increase trial duration and cost to the point of infeasibility, while broader requirements amplify confounding, increasing the risk of trial failure. This dilemma is perhaps most pronounced in spinal cord injury (SCI), but applies to all neurological disorders with low frequency and/or heterogeneous clinical manifestations. OBJECTIVE: Stratification of homogeneous patient cohorts to enable the design of clinical trials with broad inclusion criteria. METHODS: Prospectively–gathered data from patients with acute cervical SCI were analysed using an unbiased recursive partitioning conditional inference tree (URP–CTREE) approach. Performance in the 6-minute walk test at 6 months after injury was classified based on standardized neurological assessments within the first 15 days of injury. Functional and neurological outcomes were tracked throughout rehabilitation up to 6 months after injury. RESULTS: URP–CTREE identified homogeneous outcome cohorts in a study group of 309 SCI patients. These cohorts were validated by an internal, yet independent, validation group of 172 patients. The study group cohorts identified demonstrated distinct recovery profiles throughout rehabilitation. The baseline characteristics of the analysed groups were compared to a reference group of 477 patients. CONCLUSION: URP–CTREE enables inclusive trial design by revealing the distribution of outcome cohorts, discerning distinct recovery profiles and projecting potential patient enrolment by providing estimates of the relative frequencies of cohorts to improve the design of clinical trials in SCI and beyond. SAGE Publications 2022-02-14 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9003761/ /pubmed/35164574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683221078302 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Cathomen, Adrian
Sirucek, Laura
Killeen, Tim
Abel, Rainer
Maier, Doris
Weidner, Norbert
Rupp, Rüdiger
Hothorn, Torsten
Steeves, John D.
Curt, Armin
Bolliger, Marc
Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies
title Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies
title_full Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies
title_fullStr Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies
title_short Inclusive Trial Designs in Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: Prediction–Based Stratification of Clinical Walking Outcome and Projected Enrolment Frequencies
title_sort inclusive trial designs in acute spinal cord injuries: prediction–based stratification of clinical walking outcome and projected enrolment frequencies
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683221078302
work_keys_str_mv AT cathomenadrian inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT siruceklaura inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT killeentim inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT abelrainer inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT maierdoris inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT weidnernorbert inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT rupprudiger inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT hothorntorsten inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT steevesjohnd inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT curtarmin inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies
AT bolligermarc inclusivetrialdesignsinacutespinalcordinjuriespredictionbasedstratificationofclinicalwalkingoutcomeandprojectedenrolmentfrequencies