Cargando…

Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions

INTRODUCTION: Self-management education and support (SMES) programs can prevent adverse chronic disease outcomes, but factors modifying their reception remain relatively unexplored. We examined how perceptions of an SMES program were influenced by the mode of delivery, and co-receipt of a paired fin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Sophia H N, Weaver, Robert G, Manns, Braden J, Saunders-Smith, Terry, Campbell, Tavis, Ivers, Noah, Hemmelgarn, Brenda R, Tonelli, Marcello, Pannu, Raj, Campbell, David J T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422615
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S351459
_version_ 1784686392061722624
author Tran, Sophia H N
Weaver, Robert G
Manns, Braden J
Saunders-Smith, Terry
Campbell, Tavis
Ivers, Noah
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
Tonelli, Marcello
Pannu, Raj
Campbell, David J T
author_facet Tran, Sophia H N
Weaver, Robert G
Manns, Braden J
Saunders-Smith, Terry
Campbell, Tavis
Ivers, Noah
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
Tonelli, Marcello
Pannu, Raj
Campbell, David J T
author_sort Tran, Sophia H N
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Self-management education and support (SMES) programs can prevent adverse chronic disease outcomes, but factors modifying their reception remain relatively unexplored. We examined how perceptions of an SMES program were influenced by the mode of delivery, and co-receipt of a paired financial benefit. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Using a cross-sectional survey, we evaluated the perceived helpfulness of a SMES program among 446 low-income seniors at high risk for cardiovascular events in Alberta, Canada. Secondary outcomes included frequency of use, changes in perspectives on health, satisfaction with the program, and comprehensibility of the material. Participants received surveys after engaging with the program for at least 6 months. We used modified Poisson regression to calculate relative risks. Open-ended questions were analyzed inductively. RESULTS: The majority of participants reported that the SMES program was helpful (>80%). Those who also received the financial benefit (elimination of medication copayments) were more likely to report that the SMES program was helpful (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11–1.39). Those who received the program electronically were more likely to use the program weekly (RR 1.51, 1.25–1.84). Both those who received the intervention electronically (RR 1.18, 1.06–1.33), and those who also received copayment elimination (RR 1.17, 1.05–1.31) were more likely to state that the program helped change their perspectives on health. CONCLUSION: When designing SMES programs, providing the option for electronic delivery appears to promote greater use for seniors. The inclusion of online-delivery and co-receipt of tangible benefits when designing an SMES program for seniors results in favorable reception and could facilitate sustained adherence to health behavior recommendations. Participants also specifically expressed that what they enjoyed most was that the SMES program was informative, helpful, engaging, and supportive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9005130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90051302022-04-13 Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions Tran, Sophia H N Weaver, Robert G Manns, Braden J Saunders-Smith, Terry Campbell, Tavis Ivers, Noah Hemmelgarn, Brenda R Tonelli, Marcello Pannu, Raj Campbell, David J T Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research INTRODUCTION: Self-management education and support (SMES) programs can prevent adverse chronic disease outcomes, but factors modifying their reception remain relatively unexplored. We examined how perceptions of an SMES program were influenced by the mode of delivery, and co-receipt of a paired financial benefit. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Using a cross-sectional survey, we evaluated the perceived helpfulness of a SMES program among 446 low-income seniors at high risk for cardiovascular events in Alberta, Canada. Secondary outcomes included frequency of use, changes in perspectives on health, satisfaction with the program, and comprehensibility of the material. Participants received surveys after engaging with the program for at least 6 months. We used modified Poisson regression to calculate relative risks. Open-ended questions were analyzed inductively. RESULTS: The majority of participants reported that the SMES program was helpful (>80%). Those who also received the financial benefit (elimination of medication copayments) were more likely to report that the SMES program was helpful (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11–1.39). Those who received the program electronically were more likely to use the program weekly (RR 1.51, 1.25–1.84). Both those who received the intervention electronically (RR 1.18, 1.06–1.33), and those who also received copayment elimination (RR 1.17, 1.05–1.31) were more likely to state that the program helped change their perspectives on health. CONCLUSION: When designing SMES programs, providing the option for electronic delivery appears to promote greater use for seniors. The inclusion of online-delivery and co-receipt of tangible benefits when designing an SMES program for seniors results in favorable reception and could facilitate sustained adherence to health behavior recommendations. Participants also specifically expressed that what they enjoyed most was that the SMES program was informative, helpful, engaging, and supportive. Dove 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9005130/ /pubmed/35422615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S351459 Text en © 2022 Tran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tran, Sophia H N
Weaver, Robert G
Manns, Braden J
Saunders-Smith, Terry
Campbell, Tavis
Ivers, Noah
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
Tonelli, Marcello
Pannu, Raj
Campbell, David J T
Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions
title Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions
title_full Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions
title_fullStr Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions
title_short Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions
title_sort factors affecting the reception of self-management health education: a cross-sectional survey assessing perspectives of lower-income seniors with cardiovascular conditions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422615
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S351459
work_keys_str_mv AT transophiahn factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT weaverrobertg factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT mannsbradenj factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT saunderssmithterry factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT campbelltavis factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT iversnoah factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT hemmelgarnbrendar factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT tonellimarcello factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT pannuraj factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions
AT campbelldavidjt factorsaffectingthereceptionofselfmanagementhealtheducationacrosssectionalsurveyassessingperspectivesoflowerincomeseniorswithcardiovascularconditions