Cargando…

Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity

Enhanced rates and selectivity in enzymes are enabled in part by precisely tuned electric fields within active sites. Analogously, the use of charged groups to leverage electrostatics in molecular systems is a promising strategy to tune reactivity. However, separation of the through space and throug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelty, Margaret L., McNeece, Andrew J., Kurutz, Josh W., Filatov, Alexander S., Anderson, John S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9007067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc04277g
_version_ 1784686785661501440
author Kelty, Margaret L.
McNeece, Andrew J.
Kurutz, Josh W.
Filatov, Alexander S.
Anderson, John S.
author_facet Kelty, Margaret L.
McNeece, Andrew J.
Kurutz, Josh W.
Filatov, Alexander S.
Anderson, John S.
author_sort Kelty, Margaret L.
collection PubMed
description Enhanced rates and selectivity in enzymes are enabled in part by precisely tuned electric fields within active sites. Analogously, the use of charged groups to leverage electrostatics in molecular systems is a promising strategy to tune reactivity. However, separation of the through space and through bond effects of charged functional groups is a long standing challenge that limits the rational application of electric fields in molecular systems. To address this challenge we developed a method using the phosphorus selenium coupling value (J(P–Se)) of anionic phosphine selenides to quantify the electrostatic contribution of the borate moiety to donor strength. In this analysis we report the synthesis of a novel anionic phosphine, PPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)K, the corresponding tetraphenyl phosphonium and tetraethyl ammonium selenides [PPh(4)][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)] and [TEA][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)], and the Rh carbonyl complex [PPh(4)][Rh(acac)(CO)(PPh(2)(CH(2)BF(3)))]. Solvent-dependent changes in J(P–Se) were fit using Coulomb's law and support up to an 80% electrostatic contribution to the increase in donor strength of [PPh(4)][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)] relative to SePPh(2)Et, while controls with [TEA][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)] exclude convoluting ion pairing effects. Calculations using explicit solvation or point charges effectively replicate the experimental data. This J(P–Se) method was extended to [PPh(4)][SePPh(2)(2-BF(3)Ph)] and likewise estimates up to a 70% electrostatic contribution to the increase in donor strength relative to SePPh(3). The use of PPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)K also accelerates C–F oxidative addition reactivity with Ni(COD)(2) by an order of magnitude in comparison to the comparatively donating neutral phosphines PEt(3) and PCy(3). This enhanced reactivity prompted the investigation of catalytic fluoroarene C–F borylation, with improved yields observed for less fluorinated arenes. These results demonstrate that covalently bound charged functionalities can exert a significant electrostatic influence under common solution phase reaction conditions and experimentally validate theoretical predictions regarding electrostatic effects in reactivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9007067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90070672022-05-03 Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity Kelty, Margaret L. McNeece, Andrew J. Kurutz, Josh W. Filatov, Alexander S. Anderson, John S. Chem Sci Chemistry Enhanced rates and selectivity in enzymes are enabled in part by precisely tuned electric fields within active sites. Analogously, the use of charged groups to leverage electrostatics in molecular systems is a promising strategy to tune reactivity. However, separation of the through space and through bond effects of charged functional groups is a long standing challenge that limits the rational application of electric fields in molecular systems. To address this challenge we developed a method using the phosphorus selenium coupling value (J(P–Se)) of anionic phosphine selenides to quantify the electrostatic contribution of the borate moiety to donor strength. In this analysis we report the synthesis of a novel anionic phosphine, PPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)K, the corresponding tetraphenyl phosphonium and tetraethyl ammonium selenides [PPh(4)][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)] and [TEA][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)], and the Rh carbonyl complex [PPh(4)][Rh(acac)(CO)(PPh(2)(CH(2)BF(3)))]. Solvent-dependent changes in J(P–Se) were fit using Coulomb's law and support up to an 80% electrostatic contribution to the increase in donor strength of [PPh(4)][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)] relative to SePPh(2)Et, while controls with [TEA][SePPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)] exclude convoluting ion pairing effects. Calculations using explicit solvation or point charges effectively replicate the experimental data. This J(P–Se) method was extended to [PPh(4)][SePPh(2)(2-BF(3)Ph)] and likewise estimates up to a 70% electrostatic contribution to the increase in donor strength relative to SePPh(3). The use of PPh(2)CH(2)BF(3)K also accelerates C–F oxidative addition reactivity with Ni(COD)(2) by an order of magnitude in comparison to the comparatively donating neutral phosphines PEt(3) and PCy(3). This enhanced reactivity prompted the investigation of catalytic fluoroarene C–F borylation, with improved yields observed for less fluorinated arenes. These results demonstrate that covalently bound charged functionalities can exert a significant electrostatic influence under common solution phase reaction conditions and experimentally validate theoretical predictions regarding electrostatic effects in reactivity. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9007067/ /pubmed/35509471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc04277g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Kelty, Margaret L.
McNeece, Andrew J.
Kurutz, Josh W.
Filatov, Alexander S.
Anderson, John S.
Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
title Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
title_full Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
title_fullStr Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
title_full_unstemmed Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
title_short Electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
title_sort electrostatic vs. inductive effects in phosphine ligand donor properties and reactivity
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9007067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc04277g
work_keys_str_mv AT keltymargaretl electrostaticvsinductiveeffectsinphosphineliganddonorpropertiesandreactivity
AT mcneeceandrewj electrostaticvsinductiveeffectsinphosphineliganddonorpropertiesandreactivity
AT kurutzjoshw electrostaticvsinductiveeffectsinphosphineliganddonorpropertiesandreactivity
AT filatovalexanders electrostaticvsinductiveeffectsinphosphineliganddonorpropertiesandreactivity
AT andersonjohns electrostaticvsinductiveeffectsinphosphineliganddonorpropertiesandreactivity