Cargando…
Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The “Stop the Bleed” (STB) campaign has achieved remarkable results since it was launched in 2016, but there is no report on the teaching of an STB course combined with a trauma patient simulator. This study proposes the “problem-, team-, and evidence-based learning” (PTEBL) teaching met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03360-4 |
_version_ | 1784687186267865088 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Shuangyi Li, Jinfei DiNenna, Michael A. Gao, Chen Chen, Shijie Wu, Song Tang, Xiaohong He, Jinshen |
author_facet | Chen, Shuangyi Li, Jinfei DiNenna, Michael A. Gao, Chen Chen, Shijie Wu, Song Tang, Xiaohong He, Jinshen |
author_sort | Chen, Shuangyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The “Stop the Bleed” (STB) campaign has achieved remarkable results since it was launched in 2016, but there is no report on the teaching of an STB course combined with a trauma patient simulator. This study proposes the “problem-, team-, and evidence-based learning” (PTEBL) teaching method combined with Caesar (a trauma patient simulator) based on the STB course and compares its effect to that of the traditional teaching method among outstanding doctoral candidates training in haemostasis skills. METHOD: Seventy-eight outstanding doctoral candidate program students in five and eight-year programs were selected as the research subjects and were randomly divided into a control group (traditional teaching method, n = 34) and an experimental group (PTEBL teaching method combined with Caesar, n = 44). Their confidence in their haemostasis skills and willingness to rescue injured victims were investigated before and after the course in both groups. RESULT: Students’ self-confidence in their STB skills and the willingness to rescue improved after the class in both groups. Compared with the control group, students in the experimental group were more confident in compressing with bandages and compressing with a tourniquet after a class (compressing with bandages: control group 3.9 ± 0.8 vs. experimental group 4.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.014; compressing with a tourniquet: control group 3.9 ± 0.4 vs. experimental group 4.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.001) More students in the experimental group than the control group thought that the use of Caesar for scenario simulation could improve learning (control group 55.9% vs. experimental group 81.8%, P = 0.024), and using this mannequin led to higher teacher-student interaction (control group 85.3% vs. experimental group 97.7%, P = 0.042). The overall effectiveness of the teaching was better in the experimental group than in the control group (control group 85.3% vs. experimental group 97.7%, P = 0.042). There was a significant positive correlation between teacher-student interactions and the overall effectiveness of teaching (R = 1.000; 95% CI, 1.000–1.000; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PTEBL teaching method combined with Caesar can effectively improve student mastery of STB skills and overcome the shortcomings of traditional teaching methods, which has some promotional value in the training of outstanding doctoral candidates in STB skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03360-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9009024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90090242022-04-15 Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial Chen, Shuangyi Li, Jinfei DiNenna, Michael A. Gao, Chen Chen, Shijie Wu, Song Tang, Xiaohong He, Jinshen BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The “Stop the Bleed” (STB) campaign has achieved remarkable results since it was launched in 2016, but there is no report on the teaching of an STB course combined with a trauma patient simulator. This study proposes the “problem-, team-, and evidence-based learning” (PTEBL) teaching method combined with Caesar (a trauma patient simulator) based on the STB course and compares its effect to that of the traditional teaching method among outstanding doctoral candidates training in haemostasis skills. METHOD: Seventy-eight outstanding doctoral candidate program students in five and eight-year programs were selected as the research subjects and were randomly divided into a control group (traditional teaching method, n = 34) and an experimental group (PTEBL teaching method combined with Caesar, n = 44). Their confidence in their haemostasis skills and willingness to rescue injured victims were investigated before and after the course in both groups. RESULT: Students’ self-confidence in their STB skills and the willingness to rescue improved after the class in both groups. Compared with the control group, students in the experimental group were more confident in compressing with bandages and compressing with a tourniquet after a class (compressing with bandages: control group 3.9 ± 0.8 vs. experimental group 4.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.014; compressing with a tourniquet: control group 3.9 ± 0.4 vs. experimental group 4.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.001) More students in the experimental group than the control group thought that the use of Caesar for scenario simulation could improve learning (control group 55.9% vs. experimental group 81.8%, P = 0.024), and using this mannequin led to higher teacher-student interaction (control group 85.3% vs. experimental group 97.7%, P = 0.042). The overall effectiveness of the teaching was better in the experimental group than in the control group (control group 85.3% vs. experimental group 97.7%, P = 0.042). There was a significant positive correlation between teacher-student interactions and the overall effectiveness of teaching (R = 1.000; 95% CI, 1.000–1.000; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PTEBL teaching method combined with Caesar can effectively improve student mastery of STB skills and overcome the shortcomings of traditional teaching methods, which has some promotional value in the training of outstanding doctoral candidates in STB skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03360-4. BioMed Central 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9009024/ /pubmed/35421954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03360-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Shuangyi Li, Jinfei DiNenna, Michael A. Gao, Chen Chen, Shijie Wu, Song Tang, Xiaohong He, Jinshen Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03360-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenshuangyi comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lijinfei comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dinennamichaela comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gaochen comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenshijie comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wusong comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tangxiaohong comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hejinshen comparisonoftwoteachingmethodsforstoppingthebleedarandomizedcontrolledtrial |