Cargando…

Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study

Flavonoids are bioactive plant compounds that are widely present in the human diet. Estimating flavonoid intake with a high degree of certainty is challenging due to the inherent limitations of dietary questionnaires and food composition databases. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of reliabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanuza, Fabian, Bondonno, Nicola P., Zamora-Ros, Raul, Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn, Tjønneland, Anne, Landberg, Rikard, Halkjær, Jytte, Andres-Lacueva, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445059
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.873774
_version_ 1784688166483001344
author Lanuza, Fabian
Bondonno, Nicola P.
Zamora-Ros, Raul
Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn
Tjønneland, Anne
Landberg, Rikard
Halkjær, Jytte
Andres-Lacueva, Cristina
author_facet Lanuza, Fabian
Bondonno, Nicola P.
Zamora-Ros, Raul
Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn
Tjønneland, Anne
Landberg, Rikard
Halkjær, Jytte
Andres-Lacueva, Cristina
author_sort Lanuza, Fabian
collection PubMed
description Flavonoids are bioactive plant compounds that are widely present in the human diet. Estimating flavonoid intake with a high degree of certainty is challenging due to the inherent limitations of dietary questionnaires and food composition databases. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of reliability among flavonoid intakes estimated using four different approaches based on the two most comprehensive flavonoid databases, namely, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Phenol Explorer (PE). In 678 individuals from the MAX study, a subcohort of the Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations cohort, dietary data were collected using three 24-h diet recalls over 1 year. Estimates of flavonoid intake were compared using flavonoid food content from PE as (1) aglycones (chromatography with hydrolysis), (2) aglycones transformed (converted from glycosides by chromatography without hydrolysis), (3) as they are in nature (glycosides, aglycones, and esters), and 4) using flavonoid content from USDA as aglycones (converted). Spearman's intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient and weighted kappa (K) coefficient were calculated for the reliability analysis. When comparing PE total aglycones to USDA total aglycones, there was a moderate reliability when a continuous variable was used [ICC: 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70–0.76] and an excellent reliability when flavonoid intake was modeled as a categorical variable (K: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.88–0.90). The degree of reliability among all methods of estimated flavonoid intakes was very similar, especially between database pairs, for the flavanol subclass, while larger differences were observed for flavone, flavonol, and isoflavone subclasses. Our findings indicate that caution should be taken when comparing the results of the associations between flavonoid intakes and health outcomes from studies, when flavonoid intakes were estimated using different methods, particularly for some subclasses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9014246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90142462022-04-19 Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study Lanuza, Fabian Bondonno, Nicola P. Zamora-Ros, Raul Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn Tjønneland, Anne Landberg, Rikard Halkjær, Jytte Andres-Lacueva, Cristina Front Nutr Nutrition Flavonoids are bioactive plant compounds that are widely present in the human diet. Estimating flavonoid intake with a high degree of certainty is challenging due to the inherent limitations of dietary questionnaires and food composition databases. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of reliability among flavonoid intakes estimated using four different approaches based on the two most comprehensive flavonoid databases, namely, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Phenol Explorer (PE). In 678 individuals from the MAX study, a subcohort of the Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations cohort, dietary data were collected using three 24-h diet recalls over 1 year. Estimates of flavonoid intake were compared using flavonoid food content from PE as (1) aglycones (chromatography with hydrolysis), (2) aglycones transformed (converted from glycosides by chromatography without hydrolysis), (3) as they are in nature (glycosides, aglycones, and esters), and 4) using flavonoid content from USDA as aglycones (converted). Spearman's intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient and weighted kappa (K) coefficient were calculated for the reliability analysis. When comparing PE total aglycones to USDA total aglycones, there was a moderate reliability when a continuous variable was used [ICC: 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70–0.76] and an excellent reliability when flavonoid intake was modeled as a categorical variable (K: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.88–0.90). The degree of reliability among all methods of estimated flavonoid intakes was very similar, especially between database pairs, for the flavanol subclass, while larger differences were observed for flavone, flavonol, and isoflavone subclasses. Our findings indicate that caution should be taken when comparing the results of the associations between flavonoid intakes and health outcomes from studies, when flavonoid intakes were estimated using different methods, particularly for some subclasses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9014246/ /pubmed/35445059 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.873774 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lanuza, Bondonno, Zamora-Ros, Rostgaard-Hansen, Tjønneland, Landberg, Halkjær and Andres-Lacueva. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Lanuza, Fabian
Bondonno, Nicola P.
Zamora-Ros, Raul
Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn
Tjønneland, Anne
Landberg, Rikard
Halkjær, Jytte
Andres-Lacueva, Cristina
Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study
title Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study
title_full Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study
title_short Comparison of Flavonoid Intake Assessment Methods Using USDA and Phenol Explorer Databases: Subcohort Diet, Cancer and Health-Next Generations—MAX Study
title_sort comparison of flavonoid intake assessment methods using usda and phenol explorer databases: subcohort diet, cancer and health-next generations—max study
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445059
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.873774
work_keys_str_mv AT lanuzafabian comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT bondonnonicolap comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT zamorarosraul comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT rostgaardhansenagnethalinn comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT tjønnelandanne comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT landbergrikard comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT halkjærjytte comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy
AT andreslacuevacristina comparisonofflavonoidintakeassessmentmethodsusingusdaandphenolexplorerdatabasessubcohortdietcancerandhealthnextgenerationsmaxstudy