Cargando…

Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high-income countries. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is an established modifiable risk factor for this condition and is estimated to confer a larger effect on endometrial cancer risk than any other cancer site. However, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazelwood, Emma, Sanderson, Eleanor, Tan, Vanessa Y., Ruth, Katherine S., Frayling, Timothy M., Dimou, Niki, Gunter, Marc J., Dossus, Laure, Newton, Claire, Ryan, Neil, Pournaras, Dimitri J., O’Mara, Tracy A., Davey Smith, George, Martin, Richard M., Yarmolinsky, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02322-3
_version_ 1784688679843790848
author Hazelwood, Emma
Sanderson, Eleanor
Tan, Vanessa Y.
Ruth, Katherine S.
Frayling, Timothy M.
Dimou, Niki
Gunter, Marc J.
Dossus, Laure
Newton, Claire
Ryan, Neil
Pournaras, Dimitri J.
O’Mara, Tracy A.
Davey Smith, George
Martin, Richard M.
Yarmolinsky, James
author_facet Hazelwood, Emma
Sanderson, Eleanor
Tan, Vanessa Y.
Ruth, Katherine S.
Frayling, Timothy M.
Dimou, Niki
Gunter, Marc J.
Dossus, Laure
Newton, Claire
Ryan, Neil
Pournaras, Dimitri J.
O’Mara, Tracy A.
Davey Smith, George
Martin, Richard M.
Yarmolinsky, James
author_sort Hazelwood, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high-income countries. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is an established modifiable risk factor for this condition and is estimated to confer a larger effect on endometrial cancer risk than any other cancer site. However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning this association remain unclear. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the causal role of 14 molecular risk factors (hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory markers) in endometrial cancer risk. We then evaluated and quantified the potential mediating role of these molecular traits in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer using multivariable MR. METHODS: Genetic instruments to proxy 14 molecular risk factors and BMI were constructed by identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reliably associated (P < 5.0 × 10(−8)) with each respective risk factor in previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Summary statistics for the association of these SNPs with overall and subtype-specific endometrial cancer risk (12,906 cases and 108,979 controls) were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis of the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC), Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2) and UK Biobank. SNPs were combined into multi-allelic models and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were generated using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. The mediating roles of the molecular risk factors in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer were then estimated using multivariable MR. RESULTS: In MR analyses, there was strong evidence that BMI (OR per standard deviation (SD) increase 1.88, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.09, P = 3.87 × 10(−31)), total testosterone (OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 1.64, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.88, P = 1.71 × 10(−12)), bioavailable testosterone (OR per natural log transformed nmol/L increase: 1.46, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.65, P = 3.48 × 10(−9)), fasting insulin (OR per natural log transformed pmol/L increase: 3.93, 95% CI 2.29 to 6.74, P = 7.18 × 10(−7)) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG, OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85, P = 2.07 × 10(−4)) had a causal effect on endometrial cancer risk. Additionally, there was suggestive evidence that total serum cholesterol (OR per mg/dL increase 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00, P = 4.01 × 10(−2)) had an effect on endometrial cancer risk. In mediation analysis, we found evidence for a mediating role of fasting insulin (19% total effect mediated, 95% CI 5 to 34%, P = 9.17 × 10(−3)), bioavailable testosterone (15% mediated, 95% CI 10 to 20%, P = 1.43 × 10(−8)) and SHBG (7% mediated, 95% CI 1 to 12%, P = 1.81 × 10(−2)) in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive MR analysis provides insight into potential causal mechanisms linking BMI with endometrial cancer risk and suggests targeting of insulinemic and hormonal traits as a potential strategy for the prevention of endometrial cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02322-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9017004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90170042022-04-20 Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis Hazelwood, Emma Sanderson, Eleanor Tan, Vanessa Y. Ruth, Katherine S. Frayling, Timothy M. Dimou, Niki Gunter, Marc J. Dossus, Laure Newton, Claire Ryan, Neil Pournaras, Dimitri J. O’Mara, Tracy A. Davey Smith, George Martin, Richard M. Yarmolinsky, James BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high-income countries. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is an established modifiable risk factor for this condition and is estimated to confer a larger effect on endometrial cancer risk than any other cancer site. However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning this association remain unclear. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the causal role of 14 molecular risk factors (hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory markers) in endometrial cancer risk. We then evaluated and quantified the potential mediating role of these molecular traits in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer using multivariable MR. METHODS: Genetic instruments to proxy 14 molecular risk factors and BMI were constructed by identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reliably associated (P < 5.0 × 10(−8)) with each respective risk factor in previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Summary statistics for the association of these SNPs with overall and subtype-specific endometrial cancer risk (12,906 cases and 108,979 controls) were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis of the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC), Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2) and UK Biobank. SNPs were combined into multi-allelic models and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were generated using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. The mediating roles of the molecular risk factors in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer were then estimated using multivariable MR. RESULTS: In MR analyses, there was strong evidence that BMI (OR per standard deviation (SD) increase 1.88, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.09, P = 3.87 × 10(−31)), total testosterone (OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 1.64, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.88, P = 1.71 × 10(−12)), bioavailable testosterone (OR per natural log transformed nmol/L increase: 1.46, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.65, P = 3.48 × 10(−9)), fasting insulin (OR per natural log transformed pmol/L increase: 3.93, 95% CI 2.29 to 6.74, P = 7.18 × 10(−7)) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG, OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85, P = 2.07 × 10(−4)) had a causal effect on endometrial cancer risk. Additionally, there was suggestive evidence that total serum cholesterol (OR per mg/dL increase 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00, P = 4.01 × 10(−2)) had an effect on endometrial cancer risk. In mediation analysis, we found evidence for a mediating role of fasting insulin (19% total effect mediated, 95% CI 5 to 34%, P = 9.17 × 10(−3)), bioavailable testosterone (15% mediated, 95% CI 10 to 20%, P = 1.43 × 10(−8)) and SHBG (7% mediated, 95% CI 1 to 12%, P = 1.81 × 10(−2)) in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive MR analysis provides insight into potential causal mechanisms linking BMI with endometrial cancer risk and suggests targeting of insulinemic and hormonal traits as a potential strategy for the prevention of endometrial cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02322-3. BioMed Central 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9017004/ /pubmed/35436960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02322-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hazelwood, Emma
Sanderson, Eleanor
Tan, Vanessa Y.
Ruth, Katherine S.
Frayling, Timothy M.
Dimou, Niki
Gunter, Marc J.
Dossus, Laure
Newton, Claire
Ryan, Neil
Pournaras, Dimitri J.
O’Mara, Tracy A.
Davey Smith, George
Martin, Richard M.
Yarmolinsky, James
Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
title Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
title_full Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
title_fullStr Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
title_short Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
title_sort identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a mendelian randomization analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02322-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hazelwoodemma identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT sandersoneleanor identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT tanvanessay identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT ruthkatherines identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT fraylingtimothym identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT dimouniki identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT guntermarcj identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT dossuslaure identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT newtonclaire identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT ryanneil identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT pournarasdimitrij identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT omaratracya identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT daveysmithgeorge identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT martinrichardm identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT yarmolinskyjames identifyingmolecularmediatorsoftherelationshipbetweenbodymassindexandendometrialcancerriskamendelianrandomizationanalysis