Cargando…
Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
Novel gene-editing (GE) technologies provide promising opportunities to increase livestock productivity and to tackle several global livestock production sustainability and food security challenges. However, these technologies, as with previous genetic modification technologies in food production, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.856491 |
_version_ | 1784688739114549248 |
---|---|
author | Martin-Collado, Daniel Byrne, Tim J. Crowley, Jonh J. Kirk, Tom Ripoll, Guillermo Whitelaw, C. B. A. |
author_facet | Martin-Collado, Daniel Byrne, Tim J. Crowley, Jonh J. Kirk, Tom Ripoll, Guillermo Whitelaw, C. B. A. |
author_sort | Martin-Collado, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Novel gene-editing (GE) technologies provide promising opportunities to increase livestock productivity and to tackle several global livestock production sustainability and food security challenges. However, these technologies, as with previous genetic modification technologies in food production, are very likely to generate social controversy and opposition toward their use in the meat industry. Here, we explored public attitudes and consumption predisposition toward gene-edited meat products and their potential added benefits to livestock farming. Our results show that societal perception currently comes as a package, where the use of gene-editing technology acts as an extrinsic cue of meat products quality, and is used to make a range of inferences about all quality facets at once. Although consumers with anti-GE attitudinal positions generally were not sensitive to price discounts or added benefits, added benefits increased the consumption predisposition of most moderate and pro-GE consumers, where benefits related to animal welfare had larger effects than those relating to the environment or human health issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9017286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90172862022-04-20 Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior Martin-Collado, Daniel Byrne, Tim J. Crowley, Jonh J. Kirk, Tom Ripoll, Guillermo Whitelaw, C. B. A. Front Nutr Nutrition Novel gene-editing (GE) technologies provide promising opportunities to increase livestock productivity and to tackle several global livestock production sustainability and food security challenges. However, these technologies, as with previous genetic modification technologies in food production, are very likely to generate social controversy and opposition toward their use in the meat industry. Here, we explored public attitudes and consumption predisposition toward gene-edited meat products and their potential added benefits to livestock farming. Our results show that societal perception currently comes as a package, where the use of gene-editing technology acts as an extrinsic cue of meat products quality, and is used to make a range of inferences about all quality facets at once. Although consumers with anti-GE attitudinal positions generally were not sensitive to price discounts or added benefits, added benefits increased the consumption predisposition of most moderate and pro-GE consumers, where benefits related to animal welfare had larger effects than those relating to the environment or human health issues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9017286/ /pubmed/35449542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.856491 Text en Copyright © 2022 Martin-Collado, Byrne, Crowley, Kirk, Ripoll and Whitelaw. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Martin-Collado, Daniel Byrne, Tim J. Crowley, Jonh J. Kirk, Tom Ripoll, Guillermo Whitelaw, C. B. A. Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior |
title | Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior |
title_full | Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior |
title_fullStr | Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior |
title_short | Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior |
title_sort | gene-edited meat: disentangling consumers' attitudes and potential purchase behavior |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.856491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martincolladodaniel geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior AT byrnetimj geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior AT crowleyjonhj geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior AT kirktom geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior AT ripollguillermo geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior AT whitelawcba geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior |