Cargando…

Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior

Novel gene-editing (GE) technologies provide promising opportunities to increase livestock productivity and to tackle several global livestock production sustainability and food security challenges. However, these technologies, as with previous genetic modification technologies in food production, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Collado, Daniel, Byrne, Tim J., Crowley, Jonh J., Kirk, Tom, Ripoll, Guillermo, Whitelaw, C. B. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.856491
_version_ 1784688739114549248
author Martin-Collado, Daniel
Byrne, Tim J.
Crowley, Jonh J.
Kirk, Tom
Ripoll, Guillermo
Whitelaw, C. B. A.
author_facet Martin-Collado, Daniel
Byrne, Tim J.
Crowley, Jonh J.
Kirk, Tom
Ripoll, Guillermo
Whitelaw, C. B. A.
author_sort Martin-Collado, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Novel gene-editing (GE) technologies provide promising opportunities to increase livestock productivity and to tackle several global livestock production sustainability and food security challenges. However, these technologies, as with previous genetic modification technologies in food production, are very likely to generate social controversy and opposition toward their use in the meat industry. Here, we explored public attitudes and consumption predisposition toward gene-edited meat products and their potential added benefits to livestock farming. Our results show that societal perception currently comes as a package, where the use of gene-editing technology acts as an extrinsic cue of meat products quality, and is used to make a range of inferences about all quality facets at once. Although consumers with anti-GE attitudinal positions generally were not sensitive to price discounts or added benefits, added benefits increased the consumption predisposition of most moderate and pro-GE consumers, where benefits related to animal welfare had larger effects than those relating to the environment or human health issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9017286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90172862022-04-20 Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior Martin-Collado, Daniel Byrne, Tim J. Crowley, Jonh J. Kirk, Tom Ripoll, Guillermo Whitelaw, C. B. A. Front Nutr Nutrition Novel gene-editing (GE) technologies provide promising opportunities to increase livestock productivity and to tackle several global livestock production sustainability and food security challenges. However, these technologies, as with previous genetic modification technologies in food production, are very likely to generate social controversy and opposition toward their use in the meat industry. Here, we explored public attitudes and consumption predisposition toward gene-edited meat products and their potential added benefits to livestock farming. Our results show that societal perception currently comes as a package, where the use of gene-editing technology acts as an extrinsic cue of meat products quality, and is used to make a range of inferences about all quality facets at once. Although consumers with anti-GE attitudinal positions generally were not sensitive to price discounts or added benefits, added benefits increased the consumption predisposition of most moderate and pro-GE consumers, where benefits related to animal welfare had larger effects than those relating to the environment or human health issues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9017286/ /pubmed/35449542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.856491 Text en Copyright © 2022 Martin-Collado, Byrne, Crowley, Kirk, Ripoll and Whitelaw. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Martin-Collado, Daniel
Byrne, Tim J.
Crowley, Jonh J.
Kirk, Tom
Ripoll, Guillermo
Whitelaw, C. B. A.
Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
title Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
title_full Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
title_fullStr Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
title_full_unstemmed Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
title_short Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
title_sort gene-edited meat: disentangling consumers' attitudes and potential purchase behavior
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.856491
work_keys_str_mv AT martincolladodaniel geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior
AT byrnetimj geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior
AT crowleyjonhj geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior
AT kirktom geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior
AT ripollguillermo geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior
AT whitelawcba geneeditedmeatdisentanglingconsumersattitudesandpotentialpurchasebehavior