Cargando…
Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training?
BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training at lower exercise intensities has a range of applications, allowing subjects to achieve strength and hypertrophy gains matching those training at high intensity. However, there is no clear consensus on the percentage of limb occlusion pressure [%LOP,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.838115 |
_version_ | 1784690521844744192 |
---|---|
author | Das, Arpan Paton, Bruce |
author_facet | Das, Arpan Paton, Bruce |
author_sort | Das, Arpan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training at lower exercise intensities has a range of applications, allowing subjects to achieve strength and hypertrophy gains matching those training at high intensity. However, there is no clear consensus on the percentage of limb occlusion pressure [%LOP, expressed as a % of the pressure required to occlude systolic blood pressure (SBP)] and percentage of one repetition max weight (%1RM) required to achieve these results. This review aims to explore what the optimal and minimal combination of LOP and 1RM is for significant results using BFR. METHOD: A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online, Springer Link, and relevant citations from review papers was performed, and articles assessed for suitability. Original studies using BFR with a resistance training exercise intervention, who chose a set %LOP and %1RM and compared to a non-BFR control were included in this review. RESULT: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. %LOP ranged from 40 to 150%. %1RM used ranged from 15 to 80%. Training at 1RM ≤20%, or ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength results compared to controls. Applying %LOP of ≤50% and ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength improvement compared to controls. This may be due to a mechanism mediated by lactate accumulation, which is facilitated by increased training volume and a moderate exercise intensity. CONCLUSION: Training at a minimum of 30 %1RM with BFR is required for strength gains matching non-BFR high intensity training. Moderate intensity training (40–60%1RM) with BFR may produce results exceeding non-BFR high intensity however the literature is sparse. A %LOP of 50–80% is optimal for BFR training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9024204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90242042022-04-23 Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? Das, Arpan Paton, Bruce Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training at lower exercise intensities has a range of applications, allowing subjects to achieve strength and hypertrophy gains matching those training at high intensity. However, there is no clear consensus on the percentage of limb occlusion pressure [%LOP, expressed as a % of the pressure required to occlude systolic blood pressure (SBP)] and percentage of one repetition max weight (%1RM) required to achieve these results. This review aims to explore what the optimal and minimal combination of LOP and 1RM is for significant results using BFR. METHOD: A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online, Springer Link, and relevant citations from review papers was performed, and articles assessed for suitability. Original studies using BFR with a resistance training exercise intervention, who chose a set %LOP and %1RM and compared to a non-BFR control were included in this review. RESULT: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. %LOP ranged from 40 to 150%. %1RM used ranged from 15 to 80%. Training at 1RM ≤20%, or ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength results compared to controls. Applying %LOP of ≤50% and ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength improvement compared to controls. This may be due to a mechanism mediated by lactate accumulation, which is facilitated by increased training volume and a moderate exercise intensity. CONCLUSION: Training at a minimum of 30 %1RM with BFR is required for strength gains matching non-BFR high intensity training. Moderate intensity training (40–60%1RM) with BFR may produce results exceeding non-BFR high intensity however the literature is sparse. A %LOP of 50–80% is optimal for BFR training. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9024204/ /pubmed/35464074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.838115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Das and Paton. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Das, Arpan Paton, Bruce Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? |
title | Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? |
title_full | Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? |
title_fullStr | Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? |
title_short | Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training? |
title_sort | is there a minimum effective dose for vascular occlusion during blood flow restriction training? |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.838115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasarpan isthereaminimumeffectivedoseforvascularocclusionduringbloodflowrestrictiontraining AT patonbruce isthereaminimumeffectivedoseforvascularocclusionduringbloodflowrestrictiontraining |