Cargando…

A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide

Serum albumin binding moieties (ABMs) such as the Evans blue (EB) dye fragment and the 4-(p-iodophenyl)butyryl (IP) have been used to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of many radiopharmaceuticals. The goal of this work was to directly compare these two ABMs when conjugated to an integrin α(v)β(6)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Ryan A., Hausner, Sven H., Harris, Rebecca, Sutcliffe, Julie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14040745
_version_ 1784690903228612608
author Davis, Ryan A.
Hausner, Sven H.
Harris, Rebecca
Sutcliffe, Julie L.
author_facet Davis, Ryan A.
Hausner, Sven H.
Harris, Rebecca
Sutcliffe, Julie L.
author_sort Davis, Ryan A.
collection PubMed
description Serum albumin binding moieties (ABMs) such as the Evans blue (EB) dye fragment and the 4-(p-iodophenyl)butyryl (IP) have been used to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of many radiopharmaceuticals. The goal of this work was to directly compare these two ABMs when conjugated to an integrin α(v)β(6) binding peptide (α(v)β(6)-BP); a peptide that is currently being used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients with metastatic cancer. The ABM-modified α(v)β(6)-BP peptides were synthesized with a 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetracetic acid (DOTA) chelator for radiolabeling with copper-64 to yield [(64)Cu]Cu DOTA-EB-α(v)β(6)-BP ([(64)Cu]1) and [(64)Cu]Cu DOTA-IP-α(v)β(6)-BP ([(64)Cu]2). Both peptides were evaluated in vitro for serum albumin binding, serum stability, and cell binding and internalization in the paired engineered melanoma cells DX3puroβ6 (α(v)β(6) +) and DX3puro (α(v)β(6) −), and pancreatic BxPC-3 (α(v)β(6) +) cells and in vivo in a BxPC-3 xenograft mouse model. Serum albumin binding for [(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2 was 53–63% and 42–44%, respectively, with good human serum stability (24 h: [(64)Cu]1 76%, [(64)Cu]2 90%). Selective α(v)β(6) cell binding was observed for both [(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2 (α(v)β(6) (+) cells: 30.3–55.8% and 48.5–60.2%, respectively, vs. α(v)β(6) (−) cells <3.1% for both). In vivo BxPC-3 tumor uptake for both peptides at 4 h was 5.29 ± 0.59 and 7.60 ± 0.43% ID/g ([(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2, respectively), and remained at 3.32 ± 0.46 and 4.91 ± 1.19% ID/g, respectively, at 72 h, representing a >3-fold improvement over the non-ABM parent peptide and thereby providing improved PET images. Comparing [(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2, the IP-ABM-α(v)β(6)-BP [(64)Cu]2 displayed higher serum stability, higher tumor accumulation, and lower kidney and liver accumulation, resulting in better tumor-to-organ ratios for high contrast visualization of the α(v)β(6) (+) tumor by PET imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9025560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90255602022-04-23 A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide Davis, Ryan A. Hausner, Sven H. Harris, Rebecca Sutcliffe, Julie L. Pharmaceutics Article Serum albumin binding moieties (ABMs) such as the Evans blue (EB) dye fragment and the 4-(p-iodophenyl)butyryl (IP) have been used to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of many radiopharmaceuticals. The goal of this work was to directly compare these two ABMs when conjugated to an integrin α(v)β(6) binding peptide (α(v)β(6)-BP); a peptide that is currently being used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients with metastatic cancer. The ABM-modified α(v)β(6)-BP peptides were synthesized with a 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetracetic acid (DOTA) chelator for radiolabeling with copper-64 to yield [(64)Cu]Cu DOTA-EB-α(v)β(6)-BP ([(64)Cu]1) and [(64)Cu]Cu DOTA-IP-α(v)β(6)-BP ([(64)Cu]2). Both peptides were evaluated in vitro for serum albumin binding, serum stability, and cell binding and internalization in the paired engineered melanoma cells DX3puroβ6 (α(v)β(6) +) and DX3puro (α(v)β(6) −), and pancreatic BxPC-3 (α(v)β(6) +) cells and in vivo in a BxPC-3 xenograft mouse model. Serum albumin binding for [(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2 was 53–63% and 42–44%, respectively, with good human serum stability (24 h: [(64)Cu]1 76%, [(64)Cu]2 90%). Selective α(v)β(6) cell binding was observed for both [(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2 (α(v)β(6) (+) cells: 30.3–55.8% and 48.5–60.2%, respectively, vs. α(v)β(6) (−) cells <3.1% for both). In vivo BxPC-3 tumor uptake for both peptides at 4 h was 5.29 ± 0.59 and 7.60 ± 0.43% ID/g ([(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2, respectively), and remained at 3.32 ± 0.46 and 4.91 ± 1.19% ID/g, respectively, at 72 h, representing a >3-fold improvement over the non-ABM parent peptide and thereby providing improved PET images. Comparing [(64)Cu]1 and [(64)Cu]2, the IP-ABM-α(v)β(6)-BP [(64)Cu]2 displayed higher serum stability, higher tumor accumulation, and lower kidney and liver accumulation, resulting in better tumor-to-organ ratios for high contrast visualization of the α(v)β(6) (+) tumor by PET imaging. MDPI 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9025560/ /pubmed/35456579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14040745 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Davis, Ryan A.
Hausner, Sven H.
Harris, Rebecca
Sutcliffe, Julie L.
A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide
title A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide
title_full A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide
title_fullStr A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide
title_short A Comparison of Evans Blue and 4-(p-Iodophenyl)butyryl Albumin Binding Moieties on an Integrin α(v)β(6) Binding Peptide
title_sort comparison of evans blue and 4-(p-iodophenyl)butyryl albumin binding moieties on an integrin α(v)β(6) binding peptide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14040745
work_keys_str_mv AT davisryana acomparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT hausnersvenh acomparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT harrisrebecca acomparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT sutcliffejuliel acomparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT davisryana comparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT hausnersvenh comparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT harrisrebecca comparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide
AT sutcliffejuliel comparisonofevansblueand4piodophenylbutyrylalbuminbindingmoietiesonanintegrinavb6bindingpeptide