Mitigating Disputes Originated by Multiple Discordant Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: A Survey of Methodologists and Clinicians

BACKGROUND: Overlapping systematic reviews (SRs) are increasingly frequent in the medical literature. They can easily generate discordant evidence, as estimates of effect sizes and their interpretation might differ from one source to another. OBJECTIVE: To analyze how methodologists and clinicians m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puljak, Livia, Parmelli, Elena, Capobussi, Matteo, Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Marien, Squizzato, Alessandro, Moja, Lorenzo, Riva, Nicoletta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Research Metrics and Analytics
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.849019

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.849019

Ejemplares similares