Cargando…
Mitigating Disputes Originated by Multiple Discordant Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: A Survey of Methodologists and Clinicians
BACKGROUND: Overlapping systematic reviews (SRs) are increasingly frequent in the medical literature. They can easily generate discordant evidence, as estimates of effect sizes and their interpretation might differ from one source to another. OBJECTIVE: To analyze how methodologists and clinicians m...
Autores principales: | Puljak, Livia, Parmelli, Elena, Capobussi, Matteo, Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Marien, Squizzato, Alessandro, Moja, Lorenzo, Riva, Nicoletta |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.849019 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mitigating Biases in CORD-19 for Analyzing COVID-19 Literature
por: Kanakia, Anshul, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Connecting Scientometrics: Dimensions as a Route to Broadening Context for Analyses
por: Porter, Simon J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Single-case design meta-analyses in education and psychology: a systematic review of methodology
por: Moeyaert, Mariola, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
3D printing technology and internet of things prototyping in family practice: building pulse oximeters during COVID-19 pandemic
por: Capobussi, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
An open-access and inexpensive 3D printed otoscope for low-resource settings and health crises
por: Capobussi, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)