Cargando…

Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study

Background The effective and efficient delivery of healthcare services that the National Medical Commission (NMC), India desires from Indian Medical Graduate (IMG) can only be fulfilled if the learner’s participation is extensive. Flipped classroom (FC) may promote enhanced as well as meaningful lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhavsar, Milav H, Javia, Hardik N, Mehta, Sanjay J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9060739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510025
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23657
_version_ 1784698570183540736
author Bhavsar, Milav H
Javia, Hardik N
Mehta, Sanjay J
author_facet Bhavsar, Milav H
Javia, Hardik N
Mehta, Sanjay J
author_sort Bhavsar, Milav H
collection PubMed
description Background The effective and efficient delivery of healthcare services that the National Medical Commission (NMC), India desires from Indian Medical Graduate (IMG) can only be fulfilled if the learner’s participation is extensive. Flipped classroom (FC) may promote enhanced as well as meaningful learning and critical thinking in students. By implementing this method trend can be changed from a teacher-centered approach to a student-centered approach, thus teaching-learning becomes more effective and interesting. It promotes learning and thinking helping the students in diagnosis and formulating appropriate management of patients during the clinical years of medical teaching of MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) and thereafter. Aim To compare FC and traditional didactic classroom (TDC) teaching for first-year MBBS students. Objectives -To evaluate FC method teaching for first-year MBBS students. -To compare effectiveness of FC and TDC teaching for first-year MBBS students. -To evaluate perception of students toward FC teaching method. Methodology The study was conducted after getting approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Total of 100 students volunteered to participate in the study after providing informed consent. Two groups based on pseudo randomization were created and subjected to the FC method and TDC method in module A and crossover of groups was done in module B. Both groups were subjected to post-test after intervention in modules. Feedback was obtained from students on their perception toward the FC method. Results There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in post-test scores of both FC groups in both modules (FC Method: 14.77 ± 2.16 and 11.26 ± 1.76 vs TDC Method: 12.16 ± 2.05 and 10.03 ± 2.57). Overall positive feedback was received for FC method of teaching compared to TDC method. Conclusions Considering responses and results of the assessment, it can be concluded that the FC approach is beneficial for students. It enhances the learning of students. Perception of students toward medical teaching can be greatly improved. It helps students achieve better results in their learning. With larger sample size studies, this result of FC method being a better learning tool will gather more strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9060739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90607392022-05-03 Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study Bhavsar, Milav H Javia, Hardik N Mehta, Sanjay J Cureus Medical Education Background The effective and efficient delivery of healthcare services that the National Medical Commission (NMC), India desires from Indian Medical Graduate (IMG) can only be fulfilled if the learner’s participation is extensive. Flipped classroom (FC) may promote enhanced as well as meaningful learning and critical thinking in students. By implementing this method trend can be changed from a teacher-centered approach to a student-centered approach, thus teaching-learning becomes more effective and interesting. It promotes learning and thinking helping the students in diagnosis and formulating appropriate management of patients during the clinical years of medical teaching of MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) and thereafter. Aim To compare FC and traditional didactic classroom (TDC) teaching for first-year MBBS students. Objectives -To evaluate FC method teaching for first-year MBBS students. -To compare effectiveness of FC and TDC teaching for first-year MBBS students. -To evaluate perception of students toward FC teaching method. Methodology The study was conducted after getting approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Total of 100 students volunteered to participate in the study after providing informed consent. Two groups based on pseudo randomization were created and subjected to the FC method and TDC method in module A and crossover of groups was done in module B. Both groups were subjected to post-test after intervention in modules. Feedback was obtained from students on their perception toward the FC method. Results There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in post-test scores of both FC groups in both modules (FC Method: 14.77 ± 2.16 and 11.26 ± 1.76 vs TDC Method: 12.16 ± 2.05 and 10.03 ± 2.57). Overall positive feedback was received for FC method of teaching compared to TDC method. Conclusions Considering responses and results of the assessment, it can be concluded that the FC approach is beneficial for students. It enhances the learning of students. Perception of students toward medical teaching can be greatly improved. It helps students achieve better results in their learning. With larger sample size studies, this result of FC method being a better learning tool will gather more strength. Cureus 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9060739/ /pubmed/35510025 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23657 Text en Copyright © 2022, Bhavsar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Bhavsar, Milav H
Javia, Hardik N
Mehta, Sanjay J
Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study
title Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study
title_full Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study
title_short Flipped Classroom versus Traditional Didactic Classroom in Medical Teaching: A Comparative Study
title_sort flipped classroom versus traditional didactic classroom in medical teaching: a comparative study
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9060739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510025
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23657
work_keys_str_mv AT bhavsarmilavh flippedclassroomversustraditionaldidacticclassroominmedicalteachingacomparativestudy
AT javiahardikn flippedclassroomversustraditionaldidacticclassroominmedicalteachingacomparativestudy
AT mehtasanjayj flippedclassroomversustraditionaldidacticclassroominmedicalteachingacomparativestudy