Cargando…
Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens
OBJECTIVES: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the standard material for diagnostic pathology but poses relevant hurdles to accurate protein extraction due to cross-linking and chemical alterations. While numerous extraction protocols and chemicals have been described, systematic comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09346-0 |
_version_ | 1784699099873804288 |
---|---|
author | Dressler, Franz F. Schoenfeld, Jana Revyakina, Olga Vogele, Daniel Kiefer, Selina Kirfel, Jutta Gemoll, Timo Perner, Sven |
author_facet | Dressler, Franz F. Schoenfeld, Jana Revyakina, Olga Vogele, Daniel Kiefer, Selina Kirfel, Jutta Gemoll, Timo Perner, Sven |
author_sort | Dressler, Franz F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the standard material for diagnostic pathology but poses relevant hurdles to accurate protein extraction due to cross-linking and chemical alterations. While numerous extraction protocols and chemicals have been described, systematic comparative analyses are limited. Various parameters were thus investigated in their qualitative and quantitative effects on protein extraction (PE) efficacy. Special emphasis was put on preservation of membrane proteins (MP) as key subgroup of functionally relevant proteins. METHODS: Using the example of urothelial carcinoma, FFPE tissue sections were subjected to various deparaffinization, protein extraction and antigen retrieval protocols and buffers as well as different extraction techniques. Performance was measured by protein concentration and western blot analysis of cellular compartment markers as well as liquid chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry (LC–MS). RESULTS: Commercially available extraction buffers showed reduced extraction of MPs and came at considerably increased costs. On-slide extraction did not improve PE whereas several other preanalytical steps could be simplified. Systematic variation of temperature and exposure duration demonstrated a quantitatively relevant corridor of optimal antigen retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Preanalytical protein extraction can be optimized at various levels to improve unbiased protein extraction and to reduce time and costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12014-022-09346-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9063121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90631212022-05-04 Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens Dressler, Franz F. Schoenfeld, Jana Revyakina, Olga Vogele, Daniel Kiefer, Selina Kirfel, Jutta Gemoll, Timo Perner, Sven Clin Proteomics Research OBJECTIVES: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the standard material for diagnostic pathology but poses relevant hurdles to accurate protein extraction due to cross-linking and chemical alterations. While numerous extraction protocols and chemicals have been described, systematic comparative analyses are limited. Various parameters were thus investigated in their qualitative and quantitative effects on protein extraction (PE) efficacy. Special emphasis was put on preservation of membrane proteins (MP) as key subgroup of functionally relevant proteins. METHODS: Using the example of urothelial carcinoma, FFPE tissue sections were subjected to various deparaffinization, protein extraction and antigen retrieval protocols and buffers as well as different extraction techniques. Performance was measured by protein concentration and western blot analysis of cellular compartment markers as well as liquid chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry (LC–MS). RESULTS: Commercially available extraction buffers showed reduced extraction of MPs and came at considerably increased costs. On-slide extraction did not improve PE whereas several other preanalytical steps could be simplified. Systematic variation of temperature and exposure duration demonstrated a quantitatively relevant corridor of optimal antigen retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Preanalytical protein extraction can be optimized at various levels to improve unbiased protein extraction and to reduce time and costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12014-022-09346-0. BioMed Central 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9063121/ /pubmed/35501693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09346-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dressler, Franz F. Schoenfeld, Jana Revyakina, Olga Vogele, Daniel Kiefer, Selina Kirfel, Jutta Gemoll, Timo Perner, Sven Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens |
title | Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens |
title_full | Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens |
title_fullStr | Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens |
title_short | Systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic FFPE specimens |
title_sort | systematic evaluation and optimization of protein extraction parameters in diagnostic ffpe specimens |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09346-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dresslerfranzf systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT schoenfeldjana systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT revyakinaolga systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT vogeledaniel systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT kieferselina systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT kirfeljutta systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT gemolltimo systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens AT pernersven systematicevaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionparametersindiagnosticffpespecimens |