Cargando…

Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive

Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavouring (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Moldeus, Peter, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Wölfle, Detlef, Wright, Matthew, Cheyns, Karlien, Mirat, Manuela, Rincon, Ana Maria, Tard, Alexandra, Fürst, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515334
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7294
_version_ 1784699817180528640
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Cheyns, Karlien
Mirat, Manuela
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Fürst, Peter
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Cheyns, Karlien
Mirat, Manuela
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Fürst, Peter
collection PubMed
description Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavouring (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support an amendment of the EU specifications for E 476. Additionally, this opinion deals with the assessment of the proposed extension of use for E 476 in edible ices and a revision of the maximum permitted level in emulsified sauces. The Panel concluded that the proposed extension of use, if authorised, would not give rise to a safety concern. Additionally, the Panel performed a risk assessment of undesirable impurities potentially present in E 476. The Panel concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for the four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium) should be lowered based on actual levels in the commercial food additive E 476. The Panel also concluded that maximum limits for glycidyl esters and 3‐monochloropropanediol should be included in the EU specifications for E 476. Alternatively, the Panel recommends an amendment of the definition of E 476 to include a requirement that the fats and oils used in the manufacturing of E 476 comply with the respective EU legislation regarding suitability for human consumption. Further, the Panel recommends a modification of the definition of E 476 indicating that polyglycerol used for the manufacturing of E 476 should be produced from glycerol meeting the specifications for E 422 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012). In this case, respective specification limits for epichlorohydrin, acrolein and butanetriol would not be needed for E 476. Finally, the Panel concluded that the proposed method based on the determination of ricinoleic acid is suitable for the determination of E 476 content in food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9066526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90665262022-05-04 Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien Mirat, Manuela Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Fürst, Peter EFSA J Scientific Opinion Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavouring (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support an amendment of the EU specifications for E 476. Additionally, this opinion deals with the assessment of the proposed extension of use for E 476 in edible ices and a revision of the maximum permitted level in emulsified sauces. The Panel concluded that the proposed extension of use, if authorised, would not give rise to a safety concern. Additionally, the Panel performed a risk assessment of undesirable impurities potentially present in E 476. The Panel concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for the four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium) should be lowered based on actual levels in the commercial food additive E 476. The Panel also concluded that maximum limits for glycidyl esters and 3‐monochloropropanediol should be included in the EU specifications for E 476. Alternatively, the Panel recommends an amendment of the definition of E 476 to include a requirement that the fats and oils used in the manufacturing of E 476 comply with the respective EU legislation regarding suitability for human consumption. Further, the Panel recommends a modification of the definition of E 476 indicating that polyglycerol used for the manufacturing of E 476 should be produced from glycerol meeting the specifications for E 422 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012). In this case, respective specification limits for epichlorohydrin, acrolein and butanetriol would not be needed for E 476. Finally, the Panel concluded that the proposed method based on the determination of ricinoleic acid is suitable for the determination of E 476 content in food. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9066526/ /pubmed/35515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7294 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Cheyns, Karlien
Mirat, Manuela
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Fürst, Peter
Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
title Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
title_full Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
title_fullStr Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
title_full_unstemmed Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
title_short Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
title_sort follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (e 476) as a food additive
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515334
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7294
work_keys_str_mv AT followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT younesmaged followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT aquilinagabriele followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT castlelaurence followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT engelkarlheinz followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT fowlerpaul followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT frutosfernandezmariajose followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT gundertremyursula followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT gurtlerrainer followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT husøytrine followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT mancomelania followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT menneswim followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT moldeuspeter followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT passamontisabina followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT shahromina followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT waalkensberendsenine followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT wolfledetlef followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT wrightmatthew followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT cheynskarlien followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT miratmanuela followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT rinconanamaria followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT tardalexandra followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive
AT furstpeter followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive