Cargando…
Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavouring (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7294 |
_version_ | 1784699817180528640 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien Mirat, Manuela Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Fürst, Peter |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien Mirat, Manuela Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Fürst, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavouring (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support an amendment of the EU specifications for E 476. Additionally, this opinion deals with the assessment of the proposed extension of use for E 476 in edible ices and a revision of the maximum permitted level in emulsified sauces. The Panel concluded that the proposed extension of use, if authorised, would not give rise to a safety concern. Additionally, the Panel performed a risk assessment of undesirable impurities potentially present in E 476. The Panel concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for the four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium) should be lowered based on actual levels in the commercial food additive E 476. The Panel also concluded that maximum limits for glycidyl esters and 3‐monochloropropanediol should be included in the EU specifications for E 476. Alternatively, the Panel recommends an amendment of the definition of E 476 to include a requirement that the fats and oils used in the manufacturing of E 476 comply with the respective EU legislation regarding suitability for human consumption. Further, the Panel recommends a modification of the definition of E 476 indicating that polyglycerol used for the manufacturing of E 476 should be produced from glycerol meeting the specifications for E 422 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012). In this case, respective specification limits for epichlorohydrin, acrolein and butanetriol would not be needed for E 476. Finally, the Panel concluded that the proposed method based on the determination of ricinoleic acid is suitable for the determination of E 476 content in food. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9066526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90665262022-05-04 Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien Mirat, Manuela Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Fürst, Peter EFSA J Scientific Opinion Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavouring (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support an amendment of the EU specifications for E 476. Additionally, this opinion deals with the assessment of the proposed extension of use for E 476 in edible ices and a revision of the maximum permitted level in emulsified sauces. The Panel concluded that the proposed extension of use, if authorised, would not give rise to a safety concern. Additionally, the Panel performed a risk assessment of undesirable impurities potentially present in E 476. The Panel concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for the four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium) should be lowered based on actual levels in the commercial food additive E 476. The Panel also concluded that maximum limits for glycidyl esters and 3‐monochloropropanediol should be included in the EU specifications for E 476. Alternatively, the Panel recommends an amendment of the definition of E 476 to include a requirement that the fats and oils used in the manufacturing of E 476 comply with the respective EU legislation regarding suitability for human consumption. Further, the Panel recommends a modification of the definition of E 476 indicating that polyglycerol used for the manufacturing of E 476 should be produced from glycerol meeting the specifications for E 422 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012). In this case, respective specification limits for epichlorohydrin, acrolein and butanetriol would not be needed for E 476. Finally, the Panel concluded that the proposed method based on the determination of ricinoleic acid is suitable for the determination of E 476 content in food. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9066526/ /pubmed/35515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7294 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien Mirat, Manuela Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Fürst, Peter Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_full | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_fullStr | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_short | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_sort | follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (e 476) as a food additive |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT younesmaged followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT aquilinagabriele followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT castlelaurence followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT engelkarlheinz followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT fowlerpaul followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT frutosfernandezmariajose followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT gundertremyursula followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT gurtlerrainer followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT husøytrine followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT mancomelania followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT menneswim followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT moldeuspeter followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT passamontisabina followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT shahromina followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT waalkensberendsenine followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT wolfledetlef followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT wrightmatthew followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT cheynskarlien followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT miratmanuela followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT rinconanamaria followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT tardalexandra followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT furstpeter followupofthereevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive |