Cargando…

Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF

An antibody mimetic known as Fab–PEG–Fab (FpF) is a stable bivalent molecule that may have some potential therapeutic advantages over IgG antibodies due to differences in their binding kinetics as determined by surface plasmon resonance. Here we describe the thermodynamic binding properties to vascu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalili, Hanieh, Brocchini, Steve, Khaw, Peng Tee, Filippov, Sergey K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra07059h
_version_ 1784704320415989760
author Khalili, Hanieh
Brocchini, Steve
Khaw, Peng Tee
Filippov, Sergey K.
author_facet Khalili, Hanieh
Brocchini, Steve
Khaw, Peng Tee
Filippov, Sergey K.
author_sort Khalili, Hanieh
collection PubMed
description An antibody mimetic known as Fab–PEG–Fab (FpF) is a stable bivalent molecule that may have some potential therapeutic advantages over IgG antibodies due to differences in their binding kinetics as determined by surface plasmon resonance. Here we describe the thermodynamic binding properties to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) of the FpF antibody mimetics derived from bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Bevacizumab is an IgG antibody and ranibizumab is an antibody fragment (Fab). Both are used clinically to target VEGF to inhibit angiogenesis. FpF(beva) displayed comparable binding affinity (KD) and binding thermodynamics (ΔH = −25.7 kcal mole(−1) and ΔS = 14 kcal mole(−1)) to bevacizumab (ΔH = −25 kcal mole(−1), ΔS = 13.3 kcal mole(−1)). FpF(rani) interactions with VEGF were characterised by large favourable enthalpy (ΔH = −42 kcal mole(−1)) and unfavourable entropy (ΔS = 31 kcal mole(−1)) changes compared to ranibizumab (ΔH = −18.5 kcal mole(−1) and ΔS = 6.7 kcal mole(−1)), which being a Fab, is mono-valent. A large negative entropy change resulting in binding of bivalent FpF to homodimer VEGF might be due to the conformational change of the flexible regions of the FpF upon ligand binding. Mono-valent Fab (i.e. ranibizumab or the Fab derived from bevacizumab) displayed a larger degree of freedom (smaller unfavourable entropy) upon binding to homodimer VEGF. Our report describes the first comprehensive enthalpy and entropy compensation analysis for FpF antibody mimetics. While the FpFs displayed similar thermodynamics and binding affinity to the full IgG (i.e. bevacizumab), their enhanced protein stability, slower dissociation rate and lack of Fc effector functions could make FpF a potential next-generation therapy for local tissue-targeted indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9088213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90882132022-05-10 Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF Khalili, Hanieh Brocchini, Steve Khaw, Peng Tee Filippov, Sergey K. RSC Adv Chemistry An antibody mimetic known as Fab–PEG–Fab (FpF) is a stable bivalent molecule that may have some potential therapeutic advantages over IgG antibodies due to differences in their binding kinetics as determined by surface plasmon resonance. Here we describe the thermodynamic binding properties to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) of the FpF antibody mimetics derived from bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Bevacizumab is an IgG antibody and ranibizumab is an antibody fragment (Fab). Both are used clinically to target VEGF to inhibit angiogenesis. FpF(beva) displayed comparable binding affinity (KD) and binding thermodynamics (ΔH = −25.7 kcal mole(−1) and ΔS = 14 kcal mole(−1)) to bevacizumab (ΔH = −25 kcal mole(−1), ΔS = 13.3 kcal mole(−1)). FpF(rani) interactions with VEGF were characterised by large favourable enthalpy (ΔH = −42 kcal mole(−1)) and unfavourable entropy (ΔS = 31 kcal mole(−1)) changes compared to ranibizumab (ΔH = −18.5 kcal mole(−1) and ΔS = 6.7 kcal mole(−1)), which being a Fab, is mono-valent. A large negative entropy change resulting in binding of bivalent FpF to homodimer VEGF might be due to the conformational change of the flexible regions of the FpF upon ligand binding. Mono-valent Fab (i.e. ranibizumab or the Fab derived from bevacizumab) displayed a larger degree of freedom (smaller unfavourable entropy) upon binding to homodimer VEGF. Our report describes the first comprehensive enthalpy and entropy compensation analysis for FpF antibody mimetics. While the FpFs displayed similar thermodynamics and binding affinity to the full IgG (i.e. bevacizumab), their enhanced protein stability, slower dissociation rate and lack of Fc effector functions could make FpF a potential next-generation therapy for local tissue-targeted indications. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9088213/ /pubmed/35547916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra07059h Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Khalili, Hanieh
Brocchini, Steve
Khaw, Peng Tee
Filippov, Sergey K.
Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF
title Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF
title_full Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF
title_fullStr Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF
title_full_unstemmed Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF
title_short Comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to VEGF
title_sort comparative thermodynamic analysis in solution of a next generation antibody mimetic to vegf
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra07059h
work_keys_str_mv AT khalilihanieh comparativethermodynamicanalysisinsolutionofanextgenerationantibodymimetictovegf
AT brocchinisteve comparativethermodynamicanalysisinsolutionofanextgenerationantibodymimetictovegf
AT khawpengtee comparativethermodynamicanalysisinsolutionofanextgenerationantibodymimetictovegf
AT filippovsergeyk comparativethermodynamicanalysisinsolutionofanextgenerationantibodymimetictovegf