Cargando…
Can 3D diploid genome reconstruction from unphased Hi-C data be salvaged?
The three-dimensional (3D) configuration of chromatin impacts numerous cellular processes. However, directly observing chromatin architecture at high resolution is challenging. Accordingly, inferring 3D structure utilizing chromatin conformation capture assays, notably Hi-C, has received considerabl...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqac038 |
Sumario: | The three-dimensional (3D) configuration of chromatin impacts numerous cellular processes. However, directly observing chromatin architecture at high resolution is challenging. Accordingly, inferring 3D structure utilizing chromatin conformation capture assays, notably Hi-C, has received considerable attention, with a multitude of reconstruction algorithms advanced. While these have enhanced appreciation of chromatin organization, most suffer from a serious shortcoming when faced with diploid genomes: inability to disambiguate contacts between corresponding loci on homologous chromosomes, making attendant reconstructions potentially meaningless. Three recent proposals offer a computational way forward at the expense of strong assumptions. Here, we show that making plausible assumptions about the components of homologous chromosome contacts provides a basis for rescuing conventional consensus-based, unphased reconstruction. This would be consequential since not only are assumptions needed for diploid reconstruction considerable, but the sophistication of select unphased algorithms affords substantive advantages with regard resolution and folding complexity. Rather than presuming that the requisite salvaging assumptions are met, we exploit a recent imaging technology, in situ genome sequencing (IGS), to comprehensively evaluate their reasonableness. We analogously use IGS to assess assumptions underpinning diploid reconstruction algorithms. Results convincingly demonstrate that, in all instances, assumptions are not met, making further algorithm development, potentially informed by IGS data, essential. |
---|