Cargando…

A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches

Formaldehyde, the simplest molecule of the aldehyde group, is a gaseous compound at room temperature and pressure, is colorless, and has a strong, pungent odor. It is soluble in water, ethanol, and diethyl ether and is used in solution or polymerized form. Its maximum daily dosage established by the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fappiano, Luigi, Carriera, Fabiana, Iannone, Alessia, Notardonato, Ivan, Avino, Pasquale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091351
_version_ 1784707240750481408
author Fappiano, Luigi
Carriera, Fabiana
Iannone, Alessia
Notardonato, Ivan
Avino, Pasquale
author_facet Fappiano, Luigi
Carriera, Fabiana
Iannone, Alessia
Notardonato, Ivan
Avino, Pasquale
author_sort Fappiano, Luigi
collection PubMed
description Formaldehyde, the simplest molecule of the aldehyde group, is a gaseous compound at room temperature and pressure, is colorless, and has a strong, pungent odor. It is soluble in water, ethanol, and diethyl ether and is used in solution or polymerized form. Its maximum daily dosage established by the EPA is 0.2 μg g(−1) of body weight whereas that established by the WHO is between 1.5 and 14 mg g(−1): it is in category 1A of carcinogens by IARC. From an analytical point of view, formaldehyde is traditionally analyzed by HPLC with UV-Vis detection. Nowadays, the need to analyze this compound quickly and in situ is increasing. This work proposes a critical review of methods for analyzing formaldehyde in food using sensing methods. A search carried out on the Scopus database documented more than 50 papers published in the last 5 years. The increase in interest in the recognition of the presence of formaldehyde in food has occurred in recent years, above all due to an awareness of the damage it can cause to human health. This paper focuses on some new sensors by analyzing their performance and comparing them with various no-sensing methods but focusing on the determination of formaldehyde in food products. The sensors reported are of various types, but they all share a good LOD, good accuracy, and a reduced analysis time. Some of them are also biodegradable and others have a very low cost, many are portable and easy to use, therefore usable for the recognition of food adulterations on site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9102064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91020642022-05-14 A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches Fappiano, Luigi Carriera, Fabiana Iannone, Alessia Notardonato, Ivan Avino, Pasquale Foods Review Formaldehyde, the simplest molecule of the aldehyde group, is a gaseous compound at room temperature and pressure, is colorless, and has a strong, pungent odor. It is soluble in water, ethanol, and diethyl ether and is used in solution or polymerized form. Its maximum daily dosage established by the EPA is 0.2 μg g(−1) of body weight whereas that established by the WHO is between 1.5 and 14 mg g(−1): it is in category 1A of carcinogens by IARC. From an analytical point of view, formaldehyde is traditionally analyzed by HPLC with UV-Vis detection. Nowadays, the need to analyze this compound quickly and in situ is increasing. This work proposes a critical review of methods for analyzing formaldehyde in food using sensing methods. A search carried out on the Scopus database documented more than 50 papers published in the last 5 years. The increase in interest in the recognition of the presence of formaldehyde in food has occurred in recent years, above all due to an awareness of the damage it can cause to human health. This paper focuses on some new sensors by analyzing their performance and comparing them with various no-sensing methods but focusing on the determination of formaldehyde in food products. The sensors reported are of various types, but they all share a good LOD, good accuracy, and a reduced analysis time. Some of them are also biodegradable and others have a very low cost, many are portable and easy to use, therefore usable for the recognition of food adulterations on site. MDPI 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9102064/ /pubmed/35564074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091351 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Fappiano, Luigi
Carriera, Fabiana
Iannone, Alessia
Notardonato, Ivan
Avino, Pasquale
A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches
title A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches
title_full A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches
title_fullStr A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches
title_full_unstemmed A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches
title_short A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches
title_sort review on recent sensing methods for determining formaldehyde in agri-food chain: a comparison with the conventional analytical approaches
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091351
work_keys_str_mv AT fappianoluigi areviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT carrierafabiana areviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT iannonealessia areviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT notardonatoivan areviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT avinopasquale areviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT fappianoluigi reviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT carrierafabiana reviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT iannonealessia reviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT notardonatoivan reviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches
AT avinopasquale reviewonrecentsensingmethodsfordeterminingformaldehydeinagrifoodchainacomparisonwiththeconventionalanalyticalapproaches